Slashdot Mirror


Samsung To Pay Out $300 Million In Anti-Trust Suit

infernalC writes "Reuters is reporting that Samsung has agreed to plea guilty to charges of price fixing in the memory market in a $300 million settlement." From the article: " Samsung would become the third chip maker to plead guilty in the wide-ranging probe of the prices of dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, chips. The Justice Department has blamed the price-fixing conspiracy for driving up the price of chips used in products ranging from personal computers and servers to cell phones, cameras and game consoles."

15 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. And How Does This Help Me? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Samsung has agreed to plea guilty to charges of price fixing in the memory market in a $300 million settlement

    This may enrich the justice department, computer companies, and/or their shareholders, but how does it help me?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:And How Does This Help Me? by ChocoBean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly.

      are they planning on refunding each consumer of said chips a quarter each or something? or does it just mean Samsung loses money to greedy lawyers, so for the next 6 quarters Samsung will drive up the prices of the new chips (logally, maybel) to make up for it?

    2. Re:And How Does This Help Me? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IT wasnt designed to help you, dear consumer. You have been screwed, and you must learn to accept that.

      The government gets the extra cash, and of course the lawyers.

      We the consumers, almost never get a break after its proven we overpaid.

      I bet prices wont even drop after this, 'due to inflation'.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:And How Does This Help Me? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your optimism is so darn CUTE!

      If Samsung made more than $300M, then (from their perspective) the gambit worked, and they should do it again.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  2. $300M? by geomon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always wonder how much these fines really hurt mega-corps. If they were able to control prices so effectively that they were accused of price-fixing, then the potential profits from that enterprise would be in the billions.

    Seems like these fines are just the cost of doing business. I'm sure that $300M is a lot less than their manufacturing charges, or even their advertising expenses.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:$300M? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always wonder how much these fines really hurt mega-corps.

      $300 million is a lot of money to anyone - even a mega-corp.

      Nonetheless, a better question would be the motivation and impartiality of governments. It seems that the US government is busy fining every "foreign" company in every way it can (usually bullying for multi-million, or BILLION, dollar settlements), adding the proceeds to the general slush fund (it seldom makes its way to consumers), and the European governments are busy taxing - sorry fining - American companies to the tune of hundreds of millions as well.

      Welcome to the world of "free trade".

  3. The Real Question... by caenorhabditas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real question here seems to be, "Will Samsung actually change their practices?" In many high-profile anti-trust cases, it seems that the government will fine the company involved, but then the company goes back to the same old tactics of price fixing and other monopolistic behavior. How does the DOJ propose to prevent Samsung from illegal tactics in the future?

    1. Re:The Real Question... by bani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the only punishment that historically seems to have any impact on corporate behavior is to send corporate executives to prison. anything else has no effect, it's just "the price of doing business".

    2. Re:The Real Question... by kansas1051 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The answer is simple, criminal penalties against the people who orchestrated the price fixing. The settlement only "settles" Samsung's corporate liability, but the government has said they are likely to pursue criminal charges against 7 Samsung executives for Sherman act violations. So, i agree that $300 million isnt a financial deterrent to high-powered executives, but taking it up the ass in Leavenworth is.

  4. Cue the libertarian economists by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who will tell us all how regulation will never solve anything and how the government is evil for trying to break up this scam based on their own outlandish economic theories.

    Of course, from my way of thinking, $300 million, or even $485 million if you count the fine against the other chip manufacturer fined so far, is probably just a drop in the bucket compared to the money earned by this scheme. We're lucky to have a regulated economy where the government can do *something* about this at least- but if you think this is going to make those who like money more than people stop trying to destroy the free market, then I've got a bridge or six in Portland to sell you....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  5. Re:Fines and Penalties by geomon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, the companies are always able to switch to the next shady business practice.

    And they do so without admitting guilt.

    I wish I could break laws and not admit guilt.

    I guess we should all become corporations. That way we could just disincorporate and reincorporate under a different name.

    Beats going to jail.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  6. Wonderful! by medeii · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, can we do something about the other industry cartels?

    --
    got standards? --- http://www.w3.org/
  7. Re:Fines and Penalties by ergo98 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And they do so without admitting guilt.

    Because often there isn't guilt. If you really buy into the Spitzer-following belief that big companies are evil and governments are clean, then I have a bridge to sell you. In many ways a lot of these settlements are the end result of extortion - maybe there is a kernel of truth to them, but the companies settle because they can't compete with the endless resource (and law setting) ability of government.

    If the government really has a case, it should be proven in court. Settlements out of court are a travesty, and are far too open to abuse.

  8. Re:Clas-action time? by jac0b84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you all mad? It is Samsung's right to increase prices if they wish. Even if they control a specific technology, it was their development and capitol which achieved this. Price control works both ways, companies increase while the government caps. You all are so blinded by the mere chance that you could see some cash to realize that the government is limiting the sucess of our economy. When one of you create a company with its own technology , will you then be in favor of the feds denying your reward on investment?

  9. What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you can't trust giant corporations, who can you trust? I'm really disappointed in Samsung for being the first corporation to ever screw over their customers. It's almost as if they only care about the money...