Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Future Cell Phone Knows You By Your Walk

Posted by Zonk on from the i-want-my-gun-to-know-me-better dept.

jangobongo writes "Researchers at the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland have come up with a unique way to secure your cell phone if it should get lost or stolen: 'Gait code'. Motion sensors in the phone would monitor the walking pattern (or gait) of whoever is in possession of the phone, and if the 'gait' doesn't match a pre-established biometric the phone would require a password to operate. The prototype cell phone correctly identified when it was being carried by someone other than its owner 98% of the time. The research team points out (powerpoint document) that this method could also work for PDAs, laptops, USB tokens, smart cards, wallets, suitcases, and guns."

6 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. cool tech, but dumb implementation by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the gait biometric fails, and the system falls back to a password, then the system is still no stronger than a password based authentication scheme. So why add the extra complication and expense that developing this technology must surely add?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:cool tech, but dumb implementation by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the gait biometric fails, and the system falls back to a password, then the system is still no stronger than a password based authentication scheme. So why add the extra complication and expense that developing this technology must surely add?

      Because the device isn't secure at all when the owner turns off the password protection because they're tired of entering their password. If they only have to enter it 2% of the time, they're less likely to disable it.

      I think we can both agree that password protection is better than nothing.

      --
      Game! - Where the stick is mightier than the sword!
  2. Used to detect drunkenness by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I R'dTFA, and they said that one of the things that alters the user's gait "code" is when they're drunk. If you paired a Bluetooth phone with a car, and added this, it could be a biometric way of making sure someone doesn't drive drunk. Just a thought.

    --
    ttuttle is a rankmaniac
  3. The Slashdot Obvious (tm) by Roofus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Time for 100 different posters to point out 200 different situations where they think this technology will fail.

    And it all must be true, because the engineers who spent years designing this must be complete idiots, and would never think of these things on their own.

    Ready, set, go!

  4. Wouldn't voiceprint be a lot easier? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean really. It's a phone. Have it recognize my voice. Why have it recognize my walk? But this does give me an idea - why not a pair of shoes that cause blisters if they don't recognize my voice? You have to keep talking to them or they tighten up on you. Maxwell Smart (rest his soul) was on to something I think.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  5. critics missing the point by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think all the critics of this are right, yet they are missing the point, which is not even that the std pin is the backup

    Technology succeeds largely if it panders to one of the dominant human traits - lazyness.
    If the gait thing means i can save 5 secs, or maybe more on a cold day with gloves that have to be taken off, it will have a good chance in the market.