The Ups and Downs of MySQL AB
Wannabe Code Monkey writes "Forbes has an article about a recent MySQL deal with SCO and the reaction from the open source community: "It's been a rough week for Marten Mickos, the chief executive of open source database maker MySQL AB. First his most dreaded rival, Oracle acquired a company that supplies a key piece of MySQL's software, a move that could make life difficult for Uppsala, Sweden-based MySQL, which has the most popular open source database. If that wasn't bad enough, Mickos is being denounced as a traitor by noisy fanatics in the open source software community because last month he dared to make a deal with SCO Group, a company reviled by fans of Linux and other open source software.""
Now that PostgreSQL covers all major platforms (Windows with the 8.x version), is there any technical reason to use MySQL instead of PostgreSQL anymore? PostgreSQL has a better license, is free, is free, is more of a real database with transactions, triggers, stored procs, much better relational model adherence, and all the other great things about PostgreSQL mentioned in other threads. Any reason at all?
Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams