National Academies on U.S. Science
theodp writes to tell us that the National Academies, the nation's 'leading science advisory group', is warning of the continued loss of America's competitive edge with regards to science in the global community. In a press release they call for the immediate increase of teachers and advanced research and development, citing that 'in 2001 U.S. industry spent more on tort litigation than on research and development.' The Committee includes, among others, Intel's Craig 'Don't Call Us Benedict Arnold CEOs' Barrett.
Talk about hypocrisy. But then again, this is slashdot.
Actually, they're fairly easy to observe. They're the sort of people who openly claim that intelligent design is even worth considering in science classes. They even go so far as to have tested scientific theories, such as evolution, removed from science curricula.
It's necessary to question all scientific theories. That's what science is all about. But it's fanaticism when you start talking about "intelligent design" and other crap like that. Why is that? Because you're throwing out the scientific method in favour of interpretation of myth. Science cannot be based on a fanatical belief of myth.
Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
Thank you for bringing to our attention the issue of open source professionalism. Indeed, for some developers it is something that needs much work. Especially that particular KOffice developer who went around publically insulting a long time KDE and KOffice user. It saddens me that a single comment like that from such a developer can have such a negative impact on the image of such otherwise respectable projects.
Cyric Zndovzny at your service.