A Comparison of Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD Kernel
v1x writes "An article at OpenSolaris examines three of the basic subsystems of the kernel and compares implementation between Solaris 10, Linux 2.6, and FreeBSD 5.3.
From the article: 'Solaris, FreeBSD, and Linux are obviously benefiting from each other. With Solaris going open source, I expect this to continue at a faster rate. My impression is that change is most rapid in Linux. The benefits of this are that new technology has a quick incorporation into the system.'"
" A Comparison of Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD Kernel"
One is crunchy, the other's chewy, and the last is malt flavoured.
The article was a little bit short and without sufficient substance to be noteworthy on slashdot, I think.
For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
It's all in the source code that we all got about a year ago from W2K when it- gaah!
***Microsoft Trade Secrets Protection Act***
The person that wrote the above post has been dealt with for sharing Microsoft (R) Windows (R) proprietary source code and is violation of the End-User License Agreement as well as Microsoft Revised Penal Code section 192.168.0.1. The person has been terminated and please disregard the above message.
Thank you,
Microsoft Support Team
Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
Since they wrote the linux kernel, SCO engineers had a lot of skill and foresight to create such a great operating system.
Don't say it isn't true - or our lawyers will be calling.
"As most of us know, goatseFS is NOT a filesystem."
GoatseFS is sort of the Roach Motel(TM) of filesystems. Your data checks in, and no one wants it back.
"very well".
excellent, glad you agree
"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
"Bovine Scatalogical Pathology"? Given your comment, it seems you suffer from "Foot in Mouth Disease".
A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...