A Comparison of Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD Kernel

v1x writes "An article at OpenSolaris examines three of the basic subsystems of the kernel and compares implementation between Solaris 10, Linux 2.6, and FreeBSD 5.3. From the article: 'Solaris, FreeBSD, and Linux are obviously benefiting from each other. With Solaris going open source, I expect this to continue at a faster rate. My impression is that change is most rapid in Linux. The benefits of this are that new technology has a quick incorporation into the system.'"

Comments

Flavourful.

[Anonymous Coward]

" A Comparison of Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD Kernel"

One is crunchy, the other's chewy, and the last is malt flavoured.

I was expecting a beefier article...

[Improv]

The article was a little bit short and without sufficient substance to be noteworthy on slashdot, I think.

Re:I was expecting a beefier article...

[elronxenu]

You don't come here much anymore, do you?

SCO Engineers Do It Best

[Anonymous Coward]

Since they wrote the linux kernel, SCO engineers had a lot of skill and foresight to create such a great operating system.

Don't say it isn't true - or our lawyers will be calling.

Re:STFU CYRIC!

[jericho4.0]

Yes he posts a lot. Yes he sometimes states the obvious. On the other hand, he resonably often says something useful, can spell and construct sentences, and, as far as I know, is not waging a war as an anonymous coward against others. His OP above, even if he didn't mention b-trees, is still a true statment. I think I'd rather have him over for dinner than you.