Slashdot Mirror


IMDb Turns 15

An anonymous reader writes "15 years ago today, Col Needham posted some shell scripts to rec.arts.movies which allowed anyone to search lists of actors, actresses, directors, and biographies. From this humble beginning -- which predates Yahoo, Google, and even the web itself -- the IMDb has wrangled the collective wisdom of millions of submitters to become not only a top 100 website but also a standard Hollywood tool for filmmaking. IMDb is celebrating with a retrospective of the last 15 years of IMDb and movies. Congratulations to IMDb and the internet community that built it."

20 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. What other pre-web services are out there? by suso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Its easy to see that the IMDB is one of the oldest if not the oldest internet services (I'm not talking about protocols). And it also predates the web. I was wondering if any of you could name other Internet services that predate the web and still exist today. What constitutes a service is probably difficult because things like IMDB made a move from Usenet to Web which are two very different protocols (although they used them simularly).

    DISCLAIMER: Again, i'm not talking about protocols like HTTP, Usenet itself, IRC, etc.

    1. Re:What other pre-web services are out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Weather Underground. It existed solely as an interactive Telnet service.

    2. Re:What other pre-web services are out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The On-Line Guitar Archive is nearing 15. They say the oldest file they can find is from June 12, 1992.

      Wonder if the RIAA wishes those days of sueing over midis and lyrics and sheet music had never ended, when few had the bandwidth for mp3s.

    3. Re:What other pre-web services are out there? by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 5, Informative

      Without thinking too much about it, the mailing list sf-lovers (aka, morphed into USENET's rec.arts.sf.written) stems from about 1972 or so. When I checked a few days ago, there were still quite a few posters there: http://w3.aces.uiuc.edu/AIM/scale/nethistory.html

      The RISKS list dates from 1985 or so: http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/

      The comp.compilers group goes back to 1986 or so: http://compilers.iecc.com/

  2. A giant THANKS! to the IMDb people. by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just want to say Thanks! to everyone who has contributed to the the IMDb effort. Indeed, time and time again I have found it to be the ultimate resource when it comes to films. The database is always very complete, the summaries and cast lists accurate, and all in all it is a very helpful website.

    Many cheers and pip to them all! May they continue to provide such a useful service for years to come.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  3. I'd like IMDB more if... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'd like IMDB more if they didn't charge to submit basic photos to their database. I have permission for one star on their site to submit her picture (none is presently available) and they want money for something that improves their site overall.

    Leaves me with the feeling that bigness + age != niceness.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:I'd like IMDB more if... by FadedTimes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      then the Star can pay the fee and have a picture loaded. It helps prevent people posting false pictures or trying to have the star have a negative image.

  4. Thank you IMDb! by decipher_saint · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without you I wouldn't know that actor's name that was in that one movie that uhh... oh wait I know this one, he starred with umm, shit, what was her name?

    As a gift I will unblock all the ads for one day!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  5. Reverse Lookup by Buddy_DoQ · · Score: 5, Interesting
    IMDB has always been there for me when I need to know the name of an actor or crew that contributed to a given film. I can't always recall actor names, and it's always interesting to see what other films the director has made. Sometimes I go in looking for one little tidbit and end up spending hours digging through the 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon, as it were.

    Cheers!

    --
    -Buddy of DoQ
  6. Original Usenet Post by byteCoder · · Score: 5, Informative

    The original Usenet post is here, courtesy of Google.

  7. Re:15 Reasons to boycott IMDb by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ITS A MOVIE SITE. When the hell were movies NON-BLOODY-COMMERCIAL?!

    The site has a huge database, it's very easy and trustworthy to use.... it has some crap. So what? So does every site that needs to make money.

    Shut it.

  8. Re:Name change? by east+coast · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have info on movies, television, video games, you name it. Something more befitting of a database that has more than just movie information.

    Indeed. Just look at Burger King. They lost a lot of ground on McDonalds because everyone thinks they only sell burgers. No fries, no Coca Cola, just burgers. Altho I am shocked at the lack of Scottish dishes at McDonalds. I felt betrayed.

    The same thing holds with RadioShack. I thought it was radio only until I found out they also sold TVs and phones. WTF is going on around here?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  9. Re:15 Reasons to boycott IMDb by F_Scentura · · Score: 5, Insightful

    # Agent information and other data has been moved off of the free IMDb site and onto IMDbPRO, which I refuse to use.

    There's little real need for the non-industry to know agent information.

    # To insert data into this database, such as photographs of my favourite actors, costs money. This was
    supposed to be a free site.

    It's absolutely free to use. A site of that size can't live off of goodwill, sunshine, and gumdrops. I'll take a bit of annoyance to have it retain the useful information.

    # Flagrant product placement. Virtually every "article" on IMDb's front page is a paid advertisement. Most "articles" are just used to link to Ama$on items.

    They are a resource, not a content provider. There are thousands of useful review sites What else do you want? If you really want to complain about sucking the corporate teat, at least bitch about AICN, IMDB makes no pretenses of objectivity.

    # IMDb has given nothing back to the community; rather it takes from the community (the poor) and gives to a large e-tailer (the rich).

    It provides a huge service to the community. They don't owe *you* specifically a damn thing.

  10. Re:15 Reasons to boycott IMDb by Quaoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I count 7...

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  11. IMDB Bottom 100 List by PhatboySlim · · Score: 5, Funny
    How did Britney's Spears' Crossroads movie end up on IMDB's Bottom 100 list? It's like the best movie of all time! Thank God that movies like Gigli, Son of the Mask, and From Justin to Kelly aren't on this list! Oh wait, there they are....

    Guess I should be on the lookout for "Legend Of Zorro" to be appearing here soon as well...

    --
    Be sure to remember the Programmers Prayer
  12. Could someone please explain... by higuy48 · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
  13. wrangled? by rakerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If by "wrangled" you mean "took contributions that users gave to the community for free, and used them to make money" then yes. Wrangled. Our friends at GraceCDDBNote are great wranglers too.

  14. IMDb Turns 15... by Afecks · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and so does most of the people on IMDb forums