Slashdot Mirror


MS Touts Time Advantage Over PS3 Launch

Gamasutra is reporting on Microsoft's loud exclamations on the advantage their November launch will afford them, compared to the expected 2006 launch of the PS3. In fact: "UK Xbox boss Neil Thompson has boasted that Microsoft expects to have a even more significant lead on the PlayStation 3 than previously supposed, suggesting that, in his opinion, the PlayStation 3 might launch in Europe as late as spring 2007 ..." More on this FUD from Next Generation.

7 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Console competition by MBraynard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Xbox 360 isn't going to compete with the PS3 when it is released - there isn't much point in discussing them head to head for market performance purposes.

    The Xbox 360 will be competing with the PS2, however. And is anyone predicting that there will be more Xbox 360 games sold in than PS2 games sold in the time before the release of the PS3? Or at least in the time before the end of the 05 holiday shopping season?

    Perhaps the sales of games will tilt a little more in favor of the Xbox brands and the PS2 sales > xbox 360 + xbox sales won't be as overwhelming as the PS2 sales > xbox sales were in the earlier days.

    Rather than focusing on trashing a yet to be released console, I hope MS realizes that on their release day, their nemesis is still the PS2.

  2. Re:Don't Forget ... by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The word here is "may". A year ago it seemed like the X360 may launch with interesting titles, too. That usually gets resolved as launch draws closer.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  3. Re:First-release advantage? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Same answer in more words: It's the games that win, not the launch date. If they deliver the better lineup, they'll win. End of story.

  4. What MS has... by oGMo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, let's see where Microsoft is at:

    • They're releasing their second console.
    • They've got a technologically inferior console that's the sequel to a console whose only redeeming feature was technological superiority.
    • They're releasing a console without any significant original titles, and the only significantly-planned title is ... Halo 3.
    • They're trying to get this out the door early.

    So in essence, they're delivering a time-crunched crappy box that doesn't run anything... even existing XBOX games. Even the Dreamcast had (at worst estimation) a decent lineup. And it was touted as being technologically superior.

    People buy consoles for games, or at least the surety of games down the line. We can buy a PS3 and rest assured that we'll have a ton of games. We can buy a Revolution because it'll have all the Nintendo franchises we love. This is the reason tons of people bought the NES, the SNES, the GB/GBA, the PSX, the PS2.

    The 360, simply, gives no reason to buy.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  5. Dirty Tricks by malsdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems very malicious of Neil Thompson to suggest the PS3 will have such an extremely late launch date. Does he have a reliable source backing up this claim?

    I suspect he is trying to use the age old Microsoft-perfected tactic of instilling doubt about their competitor's product. Trying to say to people, the PS3 is years off (even though offically it is less than a year away) ...so buy our product which you don't really want in the meantime.

    Oh well, Microsoft using dirty tricks is nothing new I guess.

  6. Re:Wouldn't it be hilarious by badasscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also, why is it FUD if it's MS, and rumours if it's anyone else?

    It's FUD to say the PS3 won't be shipping in Europe until 2007 when Sony has said no such thing and MS clearly has a financial agenda for spreading such nonsense.

    Rumors are spread by people with either a) no vested interest, or b) an unconfirmed (or uncomfirmable) vested interest. You could call this a rumor if you didn't know the source, or if the source was independent, e.g. neither MS nor Sony (nor Nintendo).

    Coming from the company with a console going head to head with the PS3, it is FUD to spread unsubstantiated rumors that make the competing system look as bad as possible.

    You may as well say it's a "rumor" that there's SCO code in Linux. That's not a rumor, that's FUD coming from SCO. It's an unsubstantiated factoid designed for no other reason than to drive people away from a competing product and towards yours. That's the definition of what FUD is, and this is the same thing.

  7. Re:No more Sega comparisons. by superultra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't worth replying to, but it's late and I'm bored. So, specifically, you - or someone - please explain how is the Xbox360 like the Dreamcast?

    You know, instead of using one word or drunken cowardly retorts.

    Not that it matters, but I have very little personal interest in the xbox360. PGR3 looks great, as does Xbox Live 2, but beyond that - yawn. But that there aren't many games, or good games, at launch makes it completely different from the Dreamcast, which had a terrific launch lineup.