Slashdot Mirror


Designer on Slashdot Overhaul Plans

EdwardianDandy writes "Web designer Khoi Vinh, whose firm Behavior is responsible for the redesign of the Onion, argues on publish.com that an upcoming contest to overhaul Slashdot's look will yield interesting results, but the outcome will suffer because the underlying architecture is off limits." Normally I don't post stuff "About" Slashdot here since I find meta naval gazing very boring, but this article has many good points about architecture and design, even if his whole premise is based on a contest that we haven't spent more than about 5 minutes thinking about, and is mostly just meant to be a fun way for users to contribute themes to Slashdot. If Khoi wants to enter the contest, we'll consider his designs along with everyone else's. (I'm sure we can't afford him tho). And if he (or anyone) wants to make changes more substantial than cosmetic CSS, I'd consider them too. The upcoming Slashdot Redesign contest is intended to be more about design than architecture, but good ideas are good ideas.

5 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Question for oldies. by bram · · Score: 4, Informative

    more or less.

    The menus and blocks around the content were added later.
    Also, now with the css and stuff there are gradients where there weren't.

    Overall it still looks the same as in the beginning. Although a bit heavier. :)

    --
    People using html in email should be shot.
  2. Slashdot software broken, bans entire subnets by SumDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    So yesterday I was at home trying to post a comment and I got the following:

    Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, comment posting has
    temporarily been disabled. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the
    timeout corner . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down.
    If you think this is unfair, please email moderation@slashdot.org with your
    MD5'd IPID and SubnetID, which are "fbc83eaaddf909965a32494c3cf14021" and "
    0681b6883c7b099b59889c08cb34313a" and (optionally, but preferably) your IP
    number "68.xxx.xxx.xxx http://68.xxx.xxx.xxx/>" and your username "SumDog".

    So I emailed them telling them the problem. I was a subscriber, with decent Karma and I don't troll (although I bet this will be modded as a troll sadly). The response I got was:

    > On 10/17/05, Robert Rozeboom wrote:
    >>
    >> It looks like you share this subnet with a troll, sorry.

    The next day, I am still unable to post from home. I have to ssh into work and use lynx to post a comment. I e-mailed him again and got this response:

    I;m sorry but I can't unblock your subnet.

    Again from Robert Rozeboom. I actually support slashdot, bought a subscription (yea I know it's only $10) and I can't post from home because someone who uses a Comcast cable modem is a troll?! What the fuck?!

    They don't bother to check the individual user, but instead ban an entire sub net. There were several comments I wanted to post yesterday but couldn't, because I didn't want to sit with a damn ssh terminal in lynx retyping my user name and password for each comment (I had cookies turned on in Lynx, but it didn't remember my authentication).

    If I had done something wrong, I could understand. If there was some way I could fix the problem I would. But even if I unplug my cable modem and get a new IP, it will still likely be on the same subnet. I can't change providers, I don't have DSL or any other broadband in my area (not to mention the reconnection and setup fees are insane unless they're running a special offer)

    Before slashdot worries about polishing up the look and feel of their site, they should go back and fix underlying problems with the code, maybe even add spell-check and require users to type in words from images (a.k.a reverse turing test) to prevent abuse from bots.

  3. Re:Question for oldies. by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can see a bit of the evolution of Slashdot here: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://slashdot.org

  4. This is not an isolated incident by zoloto · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, by far it is not. I share a network connection with an off campus communications provider where there are plenty of people who visit and post here. There are a few trolls and since we all share the same outgoing IP address, I get blocked as well.

    I have a subscription, I get downmodded for my "unpopular" views unfairly at times, but the majority of them are just fine. My karma is still Excellent! so wtf?

    They better start changing some of the ways things work around here... I had to use an "other" isp, my neighbor that wasn't on the lame network, to post here even!

  5. Re:Slash Light by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Informative
    now you can switch off just about anything except for the ads.

    You don't even have to see those. I have a combination of hosts-file site blocking with the adblock and flashblock extensions to Firefox, and I see no ads anywhere on this site.