Slashdot Mirror


Overcomplicated MMO Betas

Heartless writes "On the heels of Vanguard's beta 1 announcement, Heartless Gamer blog has an article looking into why MMO beta processes are overly involved and detracting from the game they are meant to improve. From the article: 'But why even have such a process in the first place? If they honestly think they are going to get any sort of actual *testing* (I use the term loosely) from an over-hyped MMORPG community... they obviously failed basic MMORPG sociology. I could link hundreds of beta leaks and broken NDA contracts, but what would be the point? What you need to know is the fact that betas are infiltrated by those that want sneak peaks at the game. Definitely not by those that truly wish to test the product. Internal testers and paid testers have proved for years to be able to produce very finished products in the single player market.'"

4 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. Weight Of Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    10,000 players...
    1% genuinely beta test
    That's a 100 person QA team - far bigger than the typical MMO will ever see.

    Now up those numbers to:
    50,000 players...
    1% genuinely beta test
    5-10% vocally bitch about every weird bug and quirk they find
    Now you're looking at 500 decent QA testers and another 2,500-5,000 pain in the ass guys who're maybe worth 1% of a tester each but cumulatively do still add up.

    A beta test doesn't have to have every player responsibly beta testing. Sheer numbers ensure the end effect still gets met.

    Besides, by public beta, the main thing that should be getting tested is load and the weird load quirks caused by 5,000 players all deciding to try the same exploit etc. That, whether they're good testers or bad, still happens. Arguably it happens even better if they're "bad" beta testers as they're more likely to do things they "shouldn't".

  2. Public Beta testers aren't bug-hunters by incubusnb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    perhaps you don't understand the term "Load Testing", to properly stabilise a persistant world you have to put the servers under conditions that are similar to how they would be after release. The only real way to Load test an MMO is to have actual people playing the game, sure, you could populate the world with a basic AI, but you wouldn't get the same situations that a human would get into. perhaps the Article Writer knows next to nothing about MMO development and is just pissed off because he couldn't get a Beta copy of City of Villians or something.

    --
    /. is overrun by bed-wetting elitist nerds
    let it be known, for anything other than servers, a *nix OS sucks
  3. That's not the point by wyldeone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The point of betas of mmorpgs is advertising. Nothing more, nothing less. It is very difficult to actually test the games, let alone have your suggestions heard in the environment set up by the game companies. They serve the same purpose as game demos released a few weeks before the release of a prominent single player game, which is to drive excitement and anticipation of the final product. I am part of a beta testing group for Activision, which stays together from game to game, and is a smaller, more intimate group. We are able to actually test and improve games (we have worked on COD, COD:UO, RTW, THUG 2, and many others published by the company), but in the environment produced by mmorpg companies this is not the goal.

    --
    In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
  4. More than free advertising... by Tojosan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's like giving out free maryjo samples.....a dealer is bound to get some instant new business. Heck, they could get a commercial on every TV show for free and it wouldn't be near the value of 1000 potential customers getting a taste. And not a taste with 1 million others but a very tight availability taste.

    Also, as a programmer, I can say you can unit test till you are blue in the face, but it only takes a user 5 minutes to find a bug you'd have never tested for.
    If only one major bug is caught that's huge icing on the marketting and catching customers angles.

    But I think there is one factor we overlooked...ego. If you'd spent years developing a new toy, you didn't do it to keep it locked up for yourself. You did it for someone to play with. I'm betting the rush of first players digging into the new toys you rolled out is huge! and heck, if it sucks, at least you only had to deal with the a small amount of laughs the first day. Ha!

    Be swell