BBC Announces Adult Doctor Who Spin-Off
Dogtanian writes "The BBC has just announced a new 'Doctor Who' spin-off called 'Torchwood'. It is intended to be more adult in tone, and will follow a team investigating alien activities in modern-day Britain. Described as a cross between 'The X-Files' and 'This Life', it will feature Captain Jack, the bisexual time-travelling conman who featured in a number of recent Who episodes. The BBC are likely hoping that this spin-off will be more successful than 'K9 and Company'. The title is an anagram of a popular British sci-fi series, by the way."
Am I the only one who isn't totally sold on Russell Davies' ability as a science fiction writer? The interpersonal drama elements of the new Who were well done, but pretty much all the sci-fi was rubbish. At least two episodes ended with some kind of big beam from the sky hitting the Tardis as a way of resolving the plot. One episode had the Doctor developing some kind of force field so the Tardis wouldn't get hit by Dalek missiles (how can you get hit by a missile when your ship dematerializes to travel through both space AND time?). And when it came right down to it, the whole "Bad Wolf" plot thread was a huge letdown at the end and didn't really make any kind of sense at all. I'm hoping the second season is better, but I get the feeling that will depend on its relying more on independent writers rather than Mr. Davies himself. The two-parter with the gas mask zombies was the best one, and the direction I'd like to see them go. Try watching a bunch of Philip Hinchcliffe-era episodes starring Tom Baker and you'll see how the new series really sort of pales in comparison.
Breakfast served all day!
The new series was good, but plagued with ambivalence. On the one hand, the Doctor makes jokes and the soundtrack plays the occasional circus melodies. On the other, he's a dark, damaged bugger of a Timelord (who may or may not have designs on his impressionable young companion), there are scenes of torure, talk of prostitutes... I for one welcome our grown-up over— no, Timelords. Now let's get rid of the pretence that this is some children's show and make it something challenging and credible*.
*Yes, I know this is fiction, but I think you catch my drift.
There aren't enough Y's in Scrabble to spell out "What do you get if you multiply six by nine" either.
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
You realize that was originally a British series... and as it happens, created by Mr. Davies...
Sure, but my point is that it airs without issue in the U.S.
I didn't give a damn whether Captain Jack was bi, my problem was that he was like a fifth wheel, or to repeat another cliche, proof positive that three's a crowd. I don't mind having the odd repeat character, but Dr. Who has always been about the Doctor and his assistant. The Doctor and Rose are great, but Captain Jack was just sort of annoying.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
To say that Captain Jack was one of the more memorable and funny characters of last season. The scene where the robots strip him naked and put him in front of a camera was great.
Jack: "Are you broadcasting live?"
(the robots agree)
Jack: "Ladies, are you in for a treat tonight!"
I have reservations, of course. The stories themselves have to be good and the writers have their work cut out for them to make him more than a one-trick pony (so to speak). Still, I'm a sucker for British television as well as sci-fi, so I'll at least give this one a watch.
Bravo! reairs much British content, if I recall correctly. And it is only available on subscription services such as cable or satellite. And even then, it is often ridiculed as an "old person's channel" by most Americans under the age of 40.
Now, take a look at that list of shows again. Those do not deal with homosexuality in any real fashion. They portray a fairly typical stereotypical view of homosexuals and homosexuality. Men with a lisp, butch women, and all that. They're using homosexual characters as foils to enhance the heterosexual image of the non-gay characters, or otherwise treat the homosexual characters as living jokes.
This serious could explore bisexuality and homosexuality in a far more mature and intelligent way, unlike Will & Grace or those other such shows.
Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
The "agenda" may belong to Russell Davies who admits, "Yes, I'm a gay writer," and goes on to say, "...to get hung up on it [the fact that Jack's bisexual] is almost too sad for words, frankly."
The problem is that people are going to get hung up on that very fact. I predict that this spin-off wouldn't do well here in the U.S.
Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
"It's even more glaring given that Doctor Who has historically been a show so foreign to sex that fandom has long speculated that the main character's species reproduces asexually."
Really? when the female timelords can regenerate their looks at anytime? I would think that they would be having lots of sex.
Personnally, i thought a good show would be about the son/daughter of Dr Who & Romana, with a K9 unit, searching the cosmos for his lost father. And of course, in the dr's old unreliable tardis that takes him/her everywhere but where they need to go.
of course, the Rani & the Master would of had some offsprings so we can have some enemys (school chum rivals or something).
But now, I guess Gallifry is no more (like that matters to a timelord, space & time, in all) so school is no more.
dang, i still haven't watched those new dr who eps i downloaded. watched the first 4 or 5, just haven't taken the time yet for the others.
Be seeing you...
Possibly it was hard for you to see past it. I found him to be an interesting character with plenty of depth, e.g. the whole issue of his bravery/cowardice, his past, etc. Making him bisexual was bold and unusual, just like giving the Doctor a northern accent.
Dr Who doesn't need fans who live solely in the past, matey. Get out. See the world. There are people exactly like Captain Jack in it. (In fact there are more like Jack than there are like Leela, who you nostalgic "no-sexuality!" pillocks seem to have conveniently forgotten)
Actually, I probably would. Dr Who should be sexless. Its not about that, nor should it be. The Sci-Fi is supposed to be the core of the show. Not who is getting laid with who (no pun, really, no pun intended).
;)
The bisexual thing doesn't bother me at all in fact. But it does irritate me slightly that Russel T Davis is using the show to "enlighten" everyone that being gay or bisexual is fine. Of course its bloody fine, but I don't care about it in my sci-fi. Well, not in Dr Who anyway.
I have Lexa Doig for my sci-fi sex interest
Clearly your opinion does not constitute everyone else's. Men are not ugly. (Well, not all of them anyway
There are four reasons television was invented: (a) Buffy the musical episode, (b) the BBC "Perfect Day" video, (c) the first epsiode of Queer as Folk, (d) "The Parting of the Ways" episode of Dr Who. Russell T Davies was responsible for two out of four of those. His being commissioned to make more television can only be a good thing.
Oh, just for the 'informative' mod points, http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/ is talking about Torchwood.
Also, because the money's coming from BBC Wales, there are probably regional political issues as well (although of the items mentioned, only the Rift was in Cardiff, and the gas creatures were there as a direct consequence of that).