The Why of Space Program Races
Deinhard writes "USA Today is running a story about the "why" behind the newly rekindled international space race. From the article: 'The science of space raises levels in areas such as computers, space materials, manufacturing technology, electronic equipment, systems integration and testing.' While it is a matter of national pride, China in specific also sees this as a way to increase the reputation of its high-tech exports."
If you've seen my posts on this issue before, you probably know how I hate these justifications for space research See:
7 33897
8 20378
7 47052
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=164516&cid=13
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=165623&cid=13
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=164705&cid=13
Long story short, if you want better computers, research better computers. If you want better materials, research better materials. You shouldn't say "Invest in ways to get into space so we can make better materials". And you shouldn't say "Space research is good because it gets us better computers." It was the computer research that produced the benefit, irrespective of whether that research is "for space" or not. Don't use peripheral gains to justify a different goal. Just say what you mean.
Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
How about learning how to successfully or sustainably manage resources once we do find them? Space is vast and empty. We live in a cornucopia. If we're screwing up this badly while living in a virtual paradise, there's no way we can survive the 1000+ year trip to the next planet. We'd eat ourselves of out food a fuel 10 years into the space journey.
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso