Open Sources 2.0
dpilgrim writes "O'Reilly has just released a successor volume to 1999's "Open Sources", entitled "Open Sources 2.0". The table of contents reveals contributions from a number of open source luminaries, including Mozilla's Mitchell Baker, Samba's Jeremy Allison, and Sleepycat's Michael Olson. There's also an essay co-authored by Slashdot's own Jeff Bates. The sample chapter is the introduction, and includes an entertaining riff on the parallels between the open source community and the Burning Man community. This volume is edited by two of the original three editors, Chris DiBona (former Slashdot editor) and Mark Stone, together with Danese Cooper. You might want to compare this with the original "Open Sources", whose entire text can be found online."
I believe the claim about the "commercial server market" refers to business-operated web servers, not to commercial server software. If I'm correct, "almost amusing" would be the introduction making such a silly error.
In fact, reading the introduction -- the whole thing is idiotic. It opens with an anecdote from The Double Helix that not only misspells Max Delbruck's name repeatedly but ascribes a view to Jim Watson that's contradicted by the quote they use. In general, the notion of Watson as a non-competitive sharer is preposterous to anyone who has read the book.
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
(answering my own question)
Credits:
I found the link to http://opensource.mit.edu/ on this page:
Matthias Stürmer wrote a thesis available from his site,
http://stuermer.ch/Master_Thesis.html"Open Source Community Building" (PDF format)
http://stuermer.ch/dcs/users/1/OpenSourceCommunitI'm sure his server can handle the attention, judging from the few replies I got to my post. : )
BlueRayMan
See subject, O'Reilly just doesn't have it up on their site yet.
Co-Editor, Open Sources
Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.