Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice Bloated?

cygnusx writes "ZDNet's George Ou has been writing a series of posts about Open Office bloat. Includes some interesting system usage comparisons" From the article: "Even when dealing with what is essentially the same data, OpenOffice Calc uses up 211 MBs of private unsharable memory while Excel uses up 34 MBs of private unsharable memory. The fact that OpenOffice.org Calc takes about 100 times the CPU time explains the kind of drastic results we were getting where Excel could open a file in 2 seconds while Calc would take almost 3 minutes. Most of that massive speed difference is due to XML being very processor intensive, but Microsoft still handles its own XML files about 7 times faster than OpenOffice.org handles OpenDocument ODS format and uses far less memory than OpenOffice.org."

4 of 941 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Consider the Source by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indeed. Intel should be pushing OpenOffice, because nothing makes me aware of how much I need to upgrade my processor like starting OpenOffice.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  2. Re:Testament to Open Source Software Developers by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny
    I would like to take this opportunity to coin the term "bloat-compatible".

    A quick check with Google shows only one hit, on a page full of Baynesian Babble.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  3. Re:Bloat? Don't talk to me about bloat... by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 5, Funny
    I have compiled OpenOffice from scratch... took a while!

    I realise you're trying to make a statement with all your telnet to port 80 instead of using a browser and such, but I think you should at least have used a compiler to build OpenOffice.

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  4. Re:"Essentially" the same data? by shark72 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It is a known problem that OOo takes a while to start. Staroffice (at the point when Sun bought it) was made by a German company. Most of the internal functions are named in german, and use abbreviations that are not obvious."

    While I understand that you were not trying to be an open source apologist, this statement is the epitomy of the frustration that many mainstream users have with open source:

    Office worker: "why does Open Office take so long to load?"

    IT guy: "That's because the routines were written by a German guy in his free time. I'm sorry, little-miss-everybody-should-speak-English, but this poor guy was working for free. What do you expect?"

    Office worker: "what does the German language have to do with this?"

    IT guy: "Your PC was built in Austin, Texas. German is its second language. See this routine here, öffnenSiediegroßeAkte()? Your American PC doesn't know what that means, and has to consult a dictionary each time it sees it. There's a group of teenagers translating it into English. They work on one word each for greater safety. One of them saw two words of the program and spent several weeks in the hospital."

    Office worker: "So, what do I do about it?"

    IT guy: "Have a little more tolerance for the global community in which we live, and worship the holy light of open source that's shining out of Richard Stallman's ass. Oh, and consider dying your hair blond, adopting a schnauzer, and carrying a riding crop. Open Office seems to like that."

    Office worker: "Dork."

    If this continues, I think it will inevetably lead to new ad campaigns like:

    Microsoft Office: We won't coerce you into adopting a schnauzer!

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.