Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Peter Jackson Not Pleased EA Experience

Posted by Zonk on from the could-have-been-better dept.

The New York Times reports in an article about the King Kong movie based game that director Peter Jackson wasn't entirely happy with his EA dealings. From the article: "Mr. Jackson, said close associates, chafed at his dealings with the industry heavyweight, Electronic Arts, during the making of the Lord of the Rings games. 'Electronic Arts was not interested in input from the filmmaker,' but later marketed the games as if he were closely involved, said Ken Kamins, Mr. Jackson's manager."

5 of 33 comments (clear)

  1. Forget Peter Jackson by chriso11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but I can't get really bent about that. After Jackson basically chopped the LOTR, I don't give him much credit. If JRR had complained about EA not working with him, then OK, then there is someone who has a valid criticism.

    But where does Jackson get the "Only Official way to interpet LOTR" badge? If he wasn't happy with how EA made the game, and didn't want his name attached, he could have easily sent lawyers.

    --
    No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    1. Re:Forget Peter Jackson by Kelson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But where does Jackson get the "Only Official way to interpet LOTR" badge?

      If they were making games based directly on the books, then yeah, there'd be no reason to get Peter Jackson involved unless they wanted to. But they made games based on his movies.

      As for "he could have easily sent lawyers" -- he just as easily chose to pick his battles and vote with his wallet instead (by choosing another company the next time). Seriously, do *you* sue every business that does something you don't like? Or do you just file a complaint and take your business elsewhere?

    2. Re:Forget Peter Jackson by Ayaress · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So 10 minutes of some stupid video game excerpt was more important than explaining how Isildur died.

      Stuff like that was what worried me years ago when I first heard about the LOTR movies.

      Not that they would do this, but that they' WOULDN'T. LOTR, as it's set in the books, isn't very theatrical. There's a lot of walking. A lot of discussion and revisiting of old topics, lots historical background, lots of closure to plot lines lines that didn't actually play a part in the trilogy, some of which don't make complete sense unless you also read the Silmarillion or the Hobbit. There were lots of bits of minor excitement leading to entire chapters - and Tolkein seems to have liked long chapters - of talking and singing and carrying on (The Tom Bombadil stretch is a good example), which could be skipped without damaging the major plot thread.

      That works in books. It works very well in books, in fact. Just not in movies. With a movie, you have that invisible clock ticking - the LOTR movies were pushing the limits of how long I wanted to sit in a cramped, poorly cleaned theater chair pondering what caused the strange discoloration on the back of the seat in front of me.

      A lot of the backstory had to get dropped. Look at Serenity: One of it's main weaknesses is that it's an ending, not a beginning. People who didn't watch Firefly tend to be lost. LOTR had to be a beginning. It was pulling the series off the shelves of nerds and putting it in front of the entire world.

      Movies also have to end on a BIG finish. I liked the Scouring of the Shire, it was an important part of the books, but it wasn't that exciting compared to the apocalyptic battle that just finished. I've seen movies that end like that, and I find myself wondering more when it'll be done so I can go pee than what's actually happening.

    3. Re:Forget Peter Jackson by stevey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      He's the one who wins the battle, but he's completely spiritually broken by the experience, can never get over it, and in the end chooses to opt out of the world because he can't keep living with his experiences in a world that pretends nothing's happened.

      Not to mention of course that he failed his task.

      The fact that the ring was destroyed was due to Gollum. Frodo himself failed (though he did a damn good job up until the moment inside Mount Doom).

      I've always thought that was a large part of the reason Frodo was allowed to leave Middle-Earth (that and the wound of the Nazgul.)

  2. King Kong (the game) was made by Ubisoft by core · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The King Kong game was created by Ubi pictures (a division of Ubisoft located in South France), makers of Ray Man, Tonic Trouble, and Beyond Good & Evil. Not sure what that all has to do with EA except they may be distributing. They had a ton of news coverage here with Peter Jackson visiting the developers and whatnot. Would journalists be guilty of hyping an empty story? .. Nah..

    Best regards,
    Emmanuel

    --
    Hit ball matching game for Windows and OS X, Atlantis: http://www.funpause.com/

    Fairies, new game from the makers of Atlantis, just out!