Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Printing Wikipedia

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the where-have-i-heard-that-idea-before dept.

rtnair writes "Entries from Wikipedia, the popular free online encyclopedia written and edited by Internet users, may soon be available in print for readers in the developing world, founder Jimmy Wales said on Monday."

12 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Mis-information? by phase_9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, so now people in developing countries will learn the truth... or just read lots of entires which have been "vandalized" with the word "boobies!"

    1. Re:Mis-information? by PornMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haven't you ever read National Geographic? They already have boobies there!

      --
      500GB of disk, 5TB of transfer, $5.95/mo
    2. Re:Mis-information? by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Funny

      you apparently didn't get the memo:

      surging, perky, young, firm, attractive breasts: pr0n
      droopy, dirty, 3rd-world, saggy, working breasts: education

      They're like food. If you like them, it's bad for you. If you don't like them, they're good for you. Or you're gay. Not sure how that works into the metaphor though.

      --
      -Styopa
  2. Another problem solved by LaughingCoder · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now we have someplace to send all of those out of work encyclopedia salesmen! They can hawk wikipedia in the third world! I can see them trapsing about, lugging a satchel full of CDs. "You don't want to deprive your children from having access to these wonderful volumes!"

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  3. Printed Wiki by Pointdexter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Presumaby each copy will be written in pencil and supplied with an eraser?

    --
    Party Time: Excellent
  4. ooooohhhh gooodie! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally I can't wait to get the hardcopy of the Robocop disertation.

  5. It must be true... by ladybugfi · · Score: 5, Funny

    First we had "it must be true, I read it in a book somewhere", then we had "it must be true, I read it in the internet somewhere". Now we have come a full circle - it must be true since it is in a printed encyclopedia.

    I'm not a great supporter of disclaimers, but here I think it would serve well.

  6. Re:800,000 English articles by b100dian · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like printing the Internet!
    wget -R . > /dev/lp0

    --
    gtkaml.org
  7. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now people in 3rd world countries all over the world will be able to know of the wonders of goatse.

  8. Re:This makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Even the CD versions make less sense than the live database. I mean.. if you cannot postback your comments and annotations, the why is it still called wikipedia ?!?

    They're releasing it on CD-RW.

  9. So many pages... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow...This will be a huge job for Google books to scan in...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  10. Missing the point by nagora · · Score: 3, Funny
    The only virtue of Wikipedia at the moment is that, being online, at least it isn't a waste of paper. This plan undermines even that.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"