Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Can Open Source Outdo the IPod?

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the open-source-is-the-answer dept.

CHaN_316 writes "Wired is running an article entitled, "Can Open Source Outdo the IPod?" Asking the open source community to help them compete with the iPod. From the article: 'Consumer electronics manufacturer Neuros Audio is tapping the open-source community to convert its upcoming portable media player from iPod road kill into a contender [...] To get the ball rolling, Neuros recently opened up the firmware code for its Neuros 442 portable media player, which is set to launch in January [...] Neuros' hardware design is complete, comprising a Texas Instruments dual-core digital signal processor, a 3.6-inch, 65,000-color TFT display and a 40-GB hard drive for recording video from a TV or home entertainment system. But the company has left a little something -- mostly user interface tweaks -- for the volunteers.' Is this a good idea or a mere publicity stunt?"

8 of 484 comments (clear)

  1. Postes firstes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is a wicked cool first post

  2. Re: Can Open Source Outdo the IPod? by varmittang · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But I thought there was no stupid questions. Is there?

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  3. offtopic- by conJunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I know this is offtopic, but this post gave me thought... I'm thinking back to the first MacWorld expo I went to in 1995, roughly around the time apple was playing around with liscencing for powermac clones...

    if you'd told me then apple was going to start kicking ass with a portable music player, i would have laughed *really* hard

  4. Open source on a PMP - Done by JediLow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've already been using open source on my iRiver - and I can tell you, it completely wipes the floor with the ipod - the only problem? The player that I have looks like an ugly box. http://www.rockbox.org

  5. Re: Can Open Source Outdo the IPod? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes. Stop being so goddam PC.

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
  6. Re:Can open source Out Do ANYTHING? by baadger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fear not the great uncleansed will be impressed with IE7. You may even be surprised how many firefox users it pulls back...

  7. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    he did say "or", not "xor"
    so he doesn't exclude both :p

  8. Re:Flamebait: all ur innovation belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

    I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

    If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

    To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

    Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

    Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

    More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

    Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

    M