GPL 3.0 Rewrite Drive Is No Democracy
linumax writes "Users will be free to comment on the upcoming complex and technical draft versions of the GNU General Public License 3.0 in an easy way, according to Eben Moglen, general counsel for the Free Software Foundation. However, Moglen said Wednesday, speaking at the Open Source Business Conference here, the rewrite of the GPL is not an election and there will be no voting on its clauses. In a session entitled GPL 3.0: Directions, Implications, Casualties, Moglen said that when GPL 2.0 was promulgated some 14 years ago, very few people cared about it. On the advice of a few dozen people and a couple of lawyers, it was written and released. "That was a fine system then. It is not a fine system now. I expect the process around GPL 3.0, when it begins in some 60 to 90 days' time, to collect a great deal of comment from people on the draft documents... ", He said."
Everybody knows those GNU people are a bunch of Commies. :)
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
does that mean that the GPL is *NOT* open source? (you can see but you can't touch)?
But... I thought... GPL... open... *HEAD EXPLODES*
When I saw this article I thought there was some new GPLed DVD R/W drive or something.
You created an account just for that comment?
YEP, I DID JUST THAT
ou created an account just for that comment? I really think you need to get a life.
This is the future of Slashdot. Really, how many comments here are truly original? One man with a few dozen such accounts could replace 90% of posts on Slashdot!
"The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
I lived for 2 years in Siberia and often bought ice cream from street vendors when it was below freezing. It makes life easier for the street vendors - they don't have to plug in their portable ice chests... =)
On the advice of a few dozen people and a couple of lawyers, it was written and released.
Wow, both people and lawyers...