Slashdot Mirror


Engineers Bringing Soap Box Racing Back Again

kpw10 writes "It appears that soap box racing has made a recent comeback as traditional races are getting big attention again. But at the same it is also adapting itself into a more modern engineering challenge: pro car designers from companies like Audi and BMW just last week raced in California's Extreme Gravity Series, with super aerodynamic racers reaching speeds of 44mph. Meanwhile on the east coast, industrial designers and artists competed in the Durham "Fall Classic Soap Box Invitational" with converted lazy boy recliners and enormous eight foot wheeled vehicles. I hope this is just a sign of what's to come!" We have come a long way since the 1930's.

83 comments

  1. CMU does this every year. by SRMoore · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't really have a link to anything, but CMU has been having it's "buggy" race for several decades.

    1. Re:CMU does this every year. by amper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here.

      Ah, Sweepstakes...the search for the smallest, lightest girls ad the biggest, strongest guys...the scrambles for rubber bits to be analyzed in the lab...

    2. Re:CMU does this every year. by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      sope boXX0r racing is fun, you no. i rode a sope box down a hil 1nce and relly enjoyed it. and i am not the biggest guy arond. i hope this catches on.

      --
      blah blah blah
    3. Re:CMU does this every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. You totally forgot to include a comment like: "This is not
      new", or "It's been done before" or "So what's new?". You see,
      this is slashdot. You're supposed to diss the stories, and
      point out how everything is not original.

      Your comment was close, but imperfect. But your mistake is not
      new, so who cares.

    4. Re:CMU does this every year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I sure hope you're not a CMU student.

    5. Re:CMU does this every year. by dagnabit · · Score: 1

      I was there in '85-'86, when one of the buggies caught fire due to some mistakes in chemically treating the tires prior to a run. I forget which house it was (I was in Kappa Sigma), but a couple of the brothers got burned pretty badly grabbing the buggy (which still had a driver strapped inside) and throwing the molten plastic shell out the back of the truck. I think they instituted a "no treatment" rule for the tires with a driver inside after that.

      Good times though, going out for the night push practices and stuff...

  2. It can be a very dangerous sport. by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed, this sort of racing can be very dangerous. Perhaps that's why it is such a thrill for participants and the racers.

    I recall watching one of these races sometime in the 1940s. Even using relatively primitive technology, some the participants were able to build cars that were quite fast. Unfortunately, I also witnessed a rather gruesome accident.

    As anyone who has seen one of the races knows, the participants start at the top of a hill and race downwards. Now, along the track hill there were a number of trees. This poor fellow got going very fast, but somehow lost control about 3/4 of the way down the hill. His car veered towards a tree, and he wasn't able to get out in time.

    Indeed, he hit the tree, and his car was demolished. Unfortunately for him, the tree went right between his legs, and violently damaged his genitals. The races were quickly cancelled, and the paramedics arrived.

    While I didn't actually see him after his accident, I talked to some of the men who had helped him out. They were completely thrown aback by the injuries he had sustained to his manhood. One of them even threw up he was so disgusted by what he had seen.

    I hope that these days they're taking more care to make the vehicles safe, or at least race them in safer areas.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      I think I can speak for all of slashdot when I say:

      OUCH!!

    2. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if the safety of these things is any better than it used to be, but reconstructive surgery has come a long way. (Excuse the pun).

    3. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I recall watching one of these races sometime in the 1940s. Even using relatively primitive technology, some the participants were able to build cars that were quite fast. Unfortunately, I also witnessed a rather gruesome accident."

      If you don't mind me asking, how old are you? I promise, I'm not setting up a joke or anything like that. But if you're 70/80 years old, I'm really curious what you think of how times have changed in the last few decades.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      1940s? Grampaw? That you??? Damn, I thought that at 45 I am rather old for this group...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    5. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by Usquebaugh · · Score: 0, Troll

      The whole idea of racing is there's meant to be a penalty for getting it wrong. I hate it when people talk of making racing safe or for that matter anything safe. How are young people meant to find an outlet for their natural agression when we board up all the windows? How is natural selection meant to take care of the un-lucky or un-skilled? Why is death/injury seen as a tragedy rather than a natural progession?

      In my youth, I'm now confirmed tog, I raced cars, rode fast, 160mph, bikes on public roads, scuba dived well below the safe limits 60m+++, rock climed, whitewater kayaked, played rugby, Ju Jitsu etc etc etc I was lucky not to end up in a coffin like a number of my friends, I came damn close more than once. But I was over 14 and had a clear understanding of the risks and consequences.

      The question to answer is what would I have done to feed my adrenaline habit if I had not had those outlets?

      An extreme example of this is Formula1. The safer they made it the worse the drivers beghaviour became. Senna and Schumacher both forced other drivers off the track at 150mph+. If they still raced at the Norschcliffe you wouldn't see them survive long if they played those games.

      I'm still liable to exceed the speed limit, I still climb and sail. But now I no longer need the rush to feel alive, although I'm not completely cured.

      My neck, shoulders, lower back and knees are pretty all in poor shape and hurt when the weather turns cold thanks mostly to rugby and scuba. My left leg has been shortened by about an inch due to thinking paddock hill bend was flat, it mostly surely is not.

      An extreme example of this is Formula1. The safer they made it the worse the drivers behaviour became. Senna and Schumacher both forced other drivers off the track at 150mph+. If they still raced at the Norschcliffe you wouldn't see them survive long if they played those games.

      I have a body not so much lived in as vandalised. But my body was given to me by my parents and when I turned 14 they told me it was mine to do with as I saw fit. I don't tell you how to treat your body, I don't impose on others and I'll be damned if I 'm going to let you impose on me!

    6. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by peterjhill2002 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a bit younger than 45, but for me, after thinking of CMU, the next thing was "The Little Rascals" I got to watch the reruns when I was little (in the '70s). Their soap box racer, for those who did not see it, featured a dog on a tread mill chasing a cat... I might not remember correctly, but I would not put it past them to have had a turbo mode where the showed the cat a mouse and had a dog chasing a cat chasing a mouse for their engine...

      As Edith would have said, "Those were the days"

    7. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

      Troll? What kind of person mods this Troll?

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    8. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall watching one of these races sometime in the 1940s.

      You must be new here...

    9. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 2, Funny

      who else but a moderator of course

      --
      TIAEAE!
    10. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by asoap · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have no clue what it is that you tried to say. Apparently you think that we should encourage people to do dangerous things or atleast to make sure that those things stay as dangerous as possible in order to facilitate your version of evolution? So that the fittest can survive? You do know that is only one aspect of evolution? By encouraging people to do something like rock climibing in order to seperate the wheat from the chaff is ludicrous. It could be a very large possibility that people who can survive something like plauges might be the next step in evolution. It might not be the survival of the strongest muscles, but the survival of the strongest immune systems.

      So in that case, let's give everyone AIDS and let those of us with the strongest immune systems stay alive! How does that sound?

      While it is true that in formula one the level of safety does allow people to do stupid things like push other cars off the road. The truth is though, now people go off the track into huge run off areas. BEFORE people would push cars off the track and they would run into the tree that would be RIGHT AT THE EDGE OF THE ROAD. When you look back at to how people used to race, you wonder how the hell they stayed alive.

      I've heard of stories of the Pre-war races when the cars had no seatbelts. They hadn't been invented yet. Instead they used hand grips beside the seats. I believe it was the story of Nuvolari who was racing when he raced over a bump and the mechanics hand grips ripped off and he went flying. He landed on the back of the car. The driver, Nuvolari grabbed him by his pant leg with one hand, and kept on steering with the other. He wouldn't stop the car! Racing was that important. That's insane! Are you saying that we should go back to that?

      I say let's keep making racing safer. I sure as hell enjoy racing, and I always get a rush out of it. I don't see how one couldn't. But I really don't __WANT__ to die nor do I want to make things more dangerous to make things more interesting.

      --
      Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
    11. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by coaxial · · Score: 2, Informative

      The whole idea of racing is there's meant to be a penalty for getting it wrong.

      Really? I thought the whole idea of racing was seeing who was the fastest. I mean, race officials don't break the legs of the losers at a track meet.

      Silly me.

    12. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT kid, YHBT.

    13. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by dj245 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm late. but I run the website for the UMO/MMA coaster car. We design these cars to crash. They often hit things. Very often they spin out (many cars have the driver sitting on the rear axle with no weight on the front tyres). Our car is perfectly safe with a great roll cage, 4 point harness, the frame has multiple redundant load paths, and the bumper is designed to collapse nicely and dissipate the energy. I only wish they had provisions for keeping the crowd a little safer.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    14. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What I tried to point out was my hatred of people who wish to impose 'safe' things on me. If things are dangerous there's a group of people who wish to make it safe and if they can't make it safe they wish to ban it! At no point in my post did I say I would force anyone else to do something dangerous, in fact towards the end I went out my way to point this out.

      My points to evolution were not meant as a mandatory test, which it already is, but rather an aside as to how we are ignoring evolution, personally I do not feel this is a wise choice given how dependent we are on nature. Natural events prove just how thin a vener civilisation is.

      Of course direct contamination is not a good idea, interestingly enough there's now a conjecture that people immune to the plague are also immune to HIV?

      F1 in 67-68 was I believe it's most lethal age and yet most people point to this as an era in which F1 was at it's best. They stayed alive in general because they were very good and nothing broke. Jack Brabham commented that if they got a hot head in F1 more than likely nature would take it's course. Personally, my hero was Jim Clark. Dies in '68 at Hockenheim in an F2 race. Tyre failure is generally seen as the cause.

      Please stop capitlising stuff I don't like being shouted at! Typing big letters doesn't make your point any better in fact rather the oppisite.

      If you weant to see trees at the edge of the road take a look at rallying or indeed Nascar where they place a solid concrete wall at the edge of the road. If 67-68 was the killing years for F1 look up the GroupB cars of the early 80s in rallying.

      I hadn't heard that story about Nuvolari. The question I think your asking is should we deliberately allow danger in motor racing that we couild remove? My answer is an un-qualified yes. Nobody in racing is forced to race, everybody chooses it. Why is Eau Rouge and 130R praised by drivers? Because it still a test of skill with consequences. After Ratzenburg and Senna died there was a huge number of changes made to circuits in the name of safety, Coulthard and Villneuve have come out and publicly stated that safety has gone to far. Think about Villneuve with his loss coming out and saything this.

      If you like racing and you don't want to die that's fine. I have the same criteria. The simple solution is to slow down, not destroy the challenge for others.

      After I wrecked at Paddock Hill Bend and modified my leg I found the corner more of a challenge than before. Did I ask they change the curcuit because I'd hurt myself? No, why should another driver be denied the challenge because I'd failed? Eventually, I was able to take the corner at the same speed as before but it took about 9 months and many laps to achieve it.

      I've driven the Norshclife and it was like going to mecca, a circuit that still maims and kills, unchanged since Lauda in '76. Do you wish to close it down or ban me from using it? How about 'Andrea Doria' a wreck that routinelly kills divers, want to put it off limits? Racing yachts around the world? The high himalaya? Running with scissors?

      It's not a problem to me if you want a nice safe life. Fate may have something else planned for you, but you want to minimise risk as far a possible for yourself. That's fine, but what gives you the right to decide for me what is acceptable risk?

      Am I insane, no. Do I have a love of life, yes. Death is part of life to run from death at every oppurtunity is to deny living.

    15. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The GP post claimed to represent all of Slashdot. Anyone who would want to make such a claim is not only clearly a troll, but also seriously deranged.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    16. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I second that motion.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    17. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      There is a point where it gets too far though. Cars for driving around in, by all means fit with airbags, steering compensators, adaptive braking, dynamic suspension and everything else. If you hit something the chances are you didn't intend to and you want the car to keep you safe.

      Racing, especially at 100+ mph, is not a safe activity. Yes, you can do things to reduce the risk like wearing helmets, but it is simply not a safe activity and there is no reason to try make it so. If you want the buzz of winning without the risks, go play on a good simulator. I've been in ones accurate enough so that if you clip another car you can actually feel it, but when you hit another car at 140mph it doesn't cause you both to spin/flip/run into barriers/explode in flames. You race in real life because the risk is what makes it different from a good simulator.

      I've been dragged down grade 3 rapids in a kayak backwards and upside down and was only spared serious head injuries because I was wearing a helmet. That is a sensible precaution to take, but taking the rocks out of that stretch of river just defeats the object, I may as well go capsize in a swimming pool.

      I personally find the risk of serious consequences to be important in learning when to call it a day. I wouldn't take a kayak down a large waterfall because I know that is way above my skill level, but if all I've ever done is kayaked in a safe environment then where is the natural instinct for "That is going to hurt, and I know I can't deal with it". If racing is made perfectly safe, racers will get into the habit of "I can go 120 on public roads with nothing going wrong because I can do it on the racetrack".

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    18. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by coaxial · · Score: 1

      *sigh* My comment describing the objective of a race is modded as "informative." Damn. Apparently the mod has never seen a race, or perhaps he's seen a race and said, "What's the objective?"

    19. Re:It can be a very dangerous sport. by GregWebb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ratzenberger and Senna both died at Imola, not Spa.

      And how?
      * Ratzenberger spun and damaged his rear wing, but didn't go in to get it checked. Next lap it failed at speed and he went straight on into a wall at speed.

      * Senna had been running for several laps behind a pace car that was far, far too slow for the job (Opel Vectra), which causes a drop in tyre pressures and consequently ride height - critical in F1 as the cars run high profile, low-pressure tyres so a low pressure can cause a major change in ride height. The car was designed to run active suspension (which runs stably at low ride heights) but had to change to passive due to a late rule change, meaning the car wasn't fully stable. On the first lap at full speed he hit a bump in a high-speed corner and crashed, and a piece of the suspension came off and penetrated his helmet - a freak accident.

      In any case, neither accident was by any means fully attributable to the circuit.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  3. Watch out for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TreeeEEEEEEEEE!!

  4. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be a lot more practical when soapboxes were more readily available.

  5. Re:Honestly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is a hobby. Practicality has never been a requirement of hobbies. Fishing for sport and collecting figurines may be deemed impractical by some, but those are hobbies. Hobbies bring enjoyment to those who take them up, and certainly not all hobbies are for all people. To me, blasting down a hill in a lightweight, aerodynamic toy sounds like a blast.

  6. Not last week... by Quarters · · Score: 3, Informative
    "...just last week raced in California's Extreme Gravity Series..."

    The Extreme Gravity series happened the first week in September. Check the date on the byline of the linked article.

    1. Re:Not last week... by droleary · · Score: 1

      The Extreme Gravity series happened the first week in September.

      Expecting Slashdot editors to clear out the submission queue within a week is like expecting Slashdot editors to edit. They're more like the TV weather goons, regurgitating with insincere authority what they're fed by the Nation Weather Service and still managing to get it wrong 90% of the time.

      But if one of you could put in a word for me, I'd love to be a Slashdot Editor. Slashdot Editing opens doors! I mean, I was a bit on edge just now, but if I was an Editor I'd just sit at the back and not get in anyone's way! . . . I've got a second-hand apron . . .

    2. Re:Not last week... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Hmmm. Extreme gravity. I'm thinking that if this can be created on earth, why can't we go in the opposite direction?

      Wouldn't that be EXTREME and RADICAL?

  7. 54mph is extreme? by corngrower · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Hah, I know of a few hills where they probabaly could hit 80.

    1. Re:54mph is extreme? by CuteVlogger · · Score: 1

      They should have picked a nice, long highway down from one of the ski resorts.

      Highway 330 in Redlands would have been high on my list - 15 miles, 6-8 degrees, lots of fun turns, lots of straight aways, and most of all, no uphill sections to slow you down.

    2. Re:54mph is extreme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speed skiers have exceeded 250km/h (155mph) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_skiing. Quite remarkable, considering they use only body position and a shaped speed suit--not a streamlined fairing!

  8. Cyclists do this regularly by richg74 · · Score: 4, Informative
    In the end the fastest gravity racer was the Volvo entry, which hit 54 mph.

    This sounds pretty fast, but road racing cyclists routinely achieve faster downhill speeds. I'm no Lance Armstrong, but I've gone down steep hills at 55-60 mph.

    The difference is that a two-wheeled vehicle can negotiate turns at higher speeds than a four-wheeled one, because the two-wheeled vehicle turns by leaning. So it doesn't have to deal with anything like the same "sideways" forces at the tire / pavement interface.

    I remember a couple of years ago watching some Tour de France footage with a (non-cycling) friend. It was one of the mountain stages. He asked, "Why do they have support motorcycles and cars?" I said, "Because the cars can't keep up going downhill through the curves."

    1. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I have done 75 MPH on a bicycle, 140 on a motorcycle, and 145 in a car. I think on a closed track a motorcycle may have the advantage in cornering, but with the uneven, bumpy, dirty roads around here if you put a motorcycle into some of the same corners I put my car in at 110 MPH, you would probably live a very short life.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Actually, you still have to deal with lateral friction between your tire and the road surface. The difference there is that there is less friction required and that it is applied mostly vertically to the vehicle, whereas a four-wheeled vehicle requires more friction due to increased mass and applies that friction non-vertically - that's why you are thrown to the outside of turns in a car and why cars tend to roll over, while motorcycles push you down into the seat in turns and do not roll up until the point they skid (whether on a part of the bike or on a tire). At least that's how I see it.

    3. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. sure you have.. funny how the world record is 80.5mph on a bicycle, and the fastest speed that amateur cycling forums is about 55mph on 20% grades

    4. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by Tomfrh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How did you do 75mph on a bike?

    5. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by richg74 · · Score: 1
      Actually, you still have to deal with lateral friction between your tire and the road surface. The difference there is that there is less friction required and that it is applied mostly vertically to the vehicle,

      Yes, that's what I was alluding to in talking about "sideways" force. Something else that matters, as someone has mentioned elsewhere in this thread, is that the cyclist can shift the center of mass relative to the contact point with the road.

    6. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by phyngerz · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by JPriest · · Score: 1
      The world record you are talking about was obtained on a flat surface, not going down hill. You are comparing apples to oranges. Those numbers are rounded, the actual # is 72 MPH on a hill 300 miles from here. I don't know the exact grade of the road, but I am willing to bet it is over 20%. The speed was achieved on a Trek Madone tailgating (drafting) an SUV.

      Today I held in my clutch to coast my car half way down a much lesser hill and hit 85, I know the #'s change for a car, but I think your 55 MPH figure is low even without drafting a vehicle.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:Cyclists do this regularly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      funny how the world record is 80.5mph on a bicycle

      It says right here the world record on flat ground is 167.043 MPH (268.831 km/h). That is more than double your statistic of 80 MPH and not even going down hill.

  9. Rubber Bowl! by Southpaw018 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah baby, Derby Downs, right next to the Rubber Bowl. Ahh, the memories of growing up in Akron and reading books about our fair city, the Rubber Capitol of the World.


    ....yeah, I'm glad I live in DC now.

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:Rubber Bowl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stole our blimp (houston) I want that back...

    2. Re:Rubber Bowl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh, my dad worked for Goodyear for 20+ years...and my most recent set of tires, after quite a bit of deliberation, are Bridgestones. I guess that's why so many people in north-east Ohio are just plain mean. Well, there's always steel...oh...what about fishing in Erie...uh...Go Ohio!!!

    3. Re:Rubber Bowl! by john82 · · Score: 1

      I rolled down the hill in 71 and 72 for the local race. It was a blast. I often wondered why we only got to go once a year.

    4. Re:Rubber Bowl! by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't get me wrong - that was a half joke. Half. I went to Derby Downs a few times as a kiddo, and I marched on the field of the Rubber Bowl several times as a marching band member in high school. It's just that Ohio's economy is so fantastically, utterly, mind-numblingly desolate right now that my only choice for jobs after college (Penn State alum) was get the hell out of the state.

      I do kinda miss Cedar Point, though. :(

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
  10. Now I Get It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ScuttleMonkey

    Scuttlebutt - Butt Monkey

    ScuttleMonkey!!!

  11. only up to certain pt it seems, then opp is true by somewhere+in+AU · · Score: 4, Informative

    local perf car mag did technical measurements on track of fast m/bike vs fast car and while lap times where within a whisker of each other on this particular circuit it's WHERE they were faster and slower that showed interesting things.

    cut to the chase: car was FASTER IN CORNERS than bike, and bike ACCELERATED faster in straights so they had different advantages in diff places.

    I've driven the circuit the mag used and you could setup a high speed drift in off camber bend with a good car (AWD Turbo GT-R) that you would NEVER contemplate/do on a bike (been riding 25+ yrs).

    So your m/bike faster in "normal" road situation up to a point but cars actually faster and faster capable, in corners.

    cheers!

  12. Oh, great. by game+kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    First I had to deal with reality shows...now I have to watch running public speakers too.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  13. Portland, Ore. Has its own a"Adult Soap Box" race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the title says, Portland, Ore. has its own a"Adult Soap Box" race.
    I've been for a number of times and it is a hoot.

  14. Tough Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "We built the car for Laguna Seca, tested at Laguna Seca, then two weeks ago they told us about this course," said Bob Wake, lead engineer for the Audi Team. "It was not cool."
    I guess the Tusken Raiders at one end of the course were a tough break too!
  15. Modded Funny??? by Zevon+2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Granted, "Informative" isn't quite right, and "Interesting" doesn't come close. Maybe "Insightful"? But speaking as a male with genitalia, this comment, while worthy, is certainly *NOT* funny.

    I mean, I know here at /. we don't all get the opportunity to actually use the genitalia as intended as often as we might like, but that doesn't make it funny!

    --
    "Someone somewhere had to wear pants for the first time. The meek and indecisive do not change our world." -Montville
    1. Re:Modded Funny??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CyricZ has been trolling a bit lately, so I'm inclined to think his post in this thread is a troll as well. See: his post about a nephew with testicular cancer and some other trolls .

    2. Re:Modded Funny??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.Heh. Beavis, he said genitalia. Heh.Heh. Mod him funny. Heh.Heh.

  16. Re:only up to certain pt it seems, then opp is tru by shird · · Score: 1

    Yes a car definetly has the advantage in the corners. Four wheels vs two gives greater surface area on the road and more traction. Its very easy to overcook the corner on a bike and wind up in the gravel - Ive done it several times myself. On a push bike you may feel like youre flying through a corner, but your real speed probably isn't that high. In contrast to a motorbike where you have a reading of your speed and are travelling at the same speed as the rest of the traffic, you notice a lot more the need to slow down for a tight corner.

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
  17. Martin's soapbox derby car caught fire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw it happen in the Simpson's Satudays of Thunder episode.

  18. "San Francisco Illegal Soapbox Derby" by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Boingboing recently had an article pointing to a Flickr Photo Set about the Bernal Heights Illegal Soapbox Derby. Lots of silly cars, and the one rule is that every car is required to have a beer holder. Usually Halloween, sometimes other weekends as well.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  19. Re:only up to certain pt it seems, then opp is tru by usrusr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    cars certainly have far more room between starting to lose grip and completely losing control (and road cycles are completely all or nothing in this aspect) but there's another important difference between bikes and cars:

    bikes can move their center of mass closer to the sides of the roads because they are not as wide as cars, allowing for a wider curve radius in the same corner. this makes a lot more difference on the narrow streets typical for tour de france downhills than on a wide racing track.

    --
    [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
  20. Futuristic soapbox car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did something like this once a few years ago with my father, before I graduated HS. We would rig up solar cells to the top of hood of the car and put in a crappy little motor that would locomote the soapbox... if nobody was in it, that is. Otherwise, it would get really hot in there.

    Technically it wasn't a soapbox car, as we used orange crates. Here is an old picture circa 1982 of it having just spun out of control and into a drainage ditch :(

  21. think of the children. by calambrac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aye, right, you sound like a regular mama's boy. Raced cars at 160? What'd you drive, a pinto? My foot won't let off the gas of my Ferrari at anything less than 200 (even in neighborhoods!). Bikes on public roads? Why, I bike on some private roads - which happen to be on a military artillery range! Scuba dived below 60m? Might as well just be dipping your toe in. Hell, I can hold my breath to 100m while I'm hunting for sharks! You climb rocks, I climbed Everest with only a single Sherpa (who I left behind at 8,000m) and my bare hands and feet. You kayak whitewater, I do that too, but without a paddle and with lead weights tied to my ankles! Rugby is a fun game (for girls and homosexuals), and jiu-jitsu is Japanese for "slap fighting" (yes, I speak Japanese, as well as 43 other languages. I am the last remaining speaker for 16 distinct dialects). Instead of all that pussy stuff I wrestle gorillas that I've loaded up with steroids and bred to be super-intelligent, usually with an arm tied behind my back, sometimes blindfolded.

    All women want to have sex with me (which means my ability to maintain an erection for up to 3 weeks at a time, with only an hour of downtime in between, really comes in handy), and all men want to be me (which they someday can, thanks to my extensive genetics research... did I mention that I'm a geneticist, as well as a nuclear physicist, meteorologist, and concert pianist? I also wrote an operating system called Calambracix that is used, interestingly enough, to run candy factories).

    You would think that with all I've accomplished, I'd be a bit arrogant, but I'm actually very humble (possibly the most humble of anyone), as is mandated by the spiritual laws of Calambracism (a religion that I founded and, incidentally, am a primary spiritual figure of). It's therefore disappointing to me to hear you brag about your personal exploits as if they should be an example to the rest of the world. Considering how unimpressive your feats are, it would be most disappointing if a young child were exposed to the notion that they could settle for a life like yours. If you were humble like me, you would recognize your inferiority and hide your head in shame, never speaking in this forum again.

    1. Re:think of the children. by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Sorry about your inferority complex :-)

      It's wasn't meant to be bragging although yes I can see how that comes across. I wanted to point out that my points weren't some idle pontification but rather the sum of my experiences.

      By the way it was 160 on a bke, I never raced cars at more than about 110.

    2. Re:think of the children. by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      ARE THERE ANY SIGNIFICANT EXPERIENCES YOU HAVE HAD, OR ACCOMPLISHMENTS YOU HAVE REALIZED, THAT HAVE HELPED TO DEFINE YOU AS A PERSON?

      I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling walls and crushing ice. I have been known to remodel train stations on my lunch breaks, making them more efficient in the area of heat retention. I translate ethnic slurs for Cuban refugees. I write award-winning operas. I manage time efficiently.

      Occasionally, I tread water for three days in a row. I woo women with my sensuous and godlike trombone playing. I can pilot bicycles up severe inclines with unflagging speed, and I cook Thirty-Minute Brownies in twenty minutes. I am an expert in stucco, a veteran in love, and an outlaw in Peru.

      Using only a hoe and a large glass of water, I once single-handedly defended a small village in the Amazon Basin from a horde of ferocious army ants. I play bluegrass cello, I was scouted by the Mets, I am the subject of numerous documentaries. When I'm bored, I build large suspension bridges in my yard. I enjoy urban hang gliding. On Wednesdays, after school, I repair electrical appliances free of charge.

      I am an abstract artist, a concrete analyst, and a ruthless bookie. Critics worldwide swoon over my original line of corduroy evening-wear. I don't perspire. I am a private citizen, yet I receive fan mail. I have been caller number nine and have won the weekend passes. Last summer I toured New Jersey with a traveling centrifugal-force demonstration. I bat .400.

      My deft floral arrangements have earned me fame in international botany circles. Children trust me.

      I can hurl tennis rackets at small moving objects with deadly accuracy. I once read Paradise Lost, Moby Dick, and David Copperfield in one day and still had time to refurbish an entire dining room that evening. I know the exact location of every food in the supermarket. I have performed several covert operations with the CIA. I sleep once a week; and when I do sleep, I sleep in a chair. While on vacation in Canada, I successfully negotiated with a group of terrorists who had seized a small bakery. The laws of physics do not apply to me.

      I balance, I weave, I dodge, I frolic, and my bills are all paid. On weekends, to let off steam, I participate in full-contact origami. Years ago I discovered the meaning of life but forgot to write it down. I have made extraordinary four course meals using only a toaster oven.

      I breed prize-winning clams. I have won bullfights in San Juan, cliff-diving competitions in Sri Lanka, and spelling bees at the Kremlin. I have played Hamlet, I have performed open-heart surgery, and I have spoken with Elvis.


      It's really annoying when these email poseurs claim to have done these baby steps. Google around for the source of this story.

    3. Re:think of the children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way it was 160 on a bke, I never raced cars at more than about 110. pussy.

    4. Re:think of the children. by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1
      I wrestle gorillas that I've loaded up with steroids and bred to be super-intelligent, usually with an arm tied behind my back, sometimes blindfolded.

      You sir, have my admiration for your non-specist outlook. If I was going to breed super-intelligent gorillas I'd want to be blindfolded every time .

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
  22. Clearly you have not seen... by TheStonepedo · · Score: 2, Informative

    bicycle drifting. Parent was talking about bicycles, not motorbikes. Despite the fact that you may never contemplate doing such maneuvers on a (motor?)bike, I'm certain the folks who race motorcycles on ice tracks put quite a lot of though into two-wheeled drifting. I myself wouldn't go out drifting on bicycles because a drift gone awry would be "crashing" every time rather than "spinning out" then recovering most times.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  23. Did the poster not RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    reaching speeds of 44mph

    From the last paragraph of the article:
    In the end the fastest gravity racer was the Volvo entry, which hit 54 mph.

    Come on, man. We're geeks here. Numbers matter.

  24. We've come a long way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not here in Portland, OR. Check out the infamous Adult Soap Box Derby, a once-a-year downhill melee with mad-max style buggies duking it out with drunken drivers. Water is the only allowed projectile (balloons, guns, etc).

    Cars are divided into two categories: Art (more like downhill parade floats), and Science (cars built for speed). Prizes are many - like 'slowest car' and 'best costume,' as well as 'worst injury,' and 'most creative.

    They've also got 'downhill poker' where riders try to pick up the best poker hand from cards scattered on the track... the infamous 'Road Rash Royal Flush'. People end up in the emergency room quite often. For more mayem, check out: http://www.soapboxracer.com

  25. Oberursel - home of the soap box derby by hughk · · Score: 3, Informative
    The town of Oberursel in Germany, about 10 miles from Frankfurt was the place where the place where the first Soap Box Derby took place in 1904. Baring the odd little incident like WW2, they have been happening there ever since. They could do extreme gravity as the town lies just underneath the Taunus range of hills. Since the big one Grosser Feldberg is about 2600 feet high with a highway to the top, they could have used that, but luckily common sense prevailed and they used the gentler slope through the town instead. Even cyclists have problems on the big hill due to brake fade and a lovely hairpin.

    As well as the more serious entrants, there have been mobile divans, bath tubs, etc. Unusually for Germany, you don't need to have any special license to do this, just to pass the pre-race safety inspection.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  26. Extreme? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative
    Bobby Car racing is extreme! Google Trans

    Over 60 mph without any aerodynamics.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  27. If major car companies are involved by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Maybe we'll start seeing them produce cars with an increasingly lower drag coefficient?

    I hope someone can beat the Ford Probe V concept eventually, and actually market it.

  28. Several decades = 3/4 of a Century by Snorpus · · Score: 1
    I've seen pictures of Sweepstakes ("Buggy") races from the 1930s.

  29. Re:only up to certain pt it seems, then opp is tru by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    The bikers love the immediate accelleration available, so there's really no replacement for that rush of stuff between your legs for them.

    I prefer a nice roll cage, but maybe I'm a wimp.

  30. cars have fast advantages in corners... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Moving the center of mass doesn't really change the horizontal part. All it does is keep you from flipping over really. If your center of mass is ever outside the outside line of tires in a turn, your vehicle will begin to rotate (flip) greatly. Thus motorcycles must lean in to keep from falling over. Cars have their center of mass between the left and right set of wheels, so the center of mass is never outside the outside wheels.

    So leaning over isn't a positive, it's a compensation for a negative.

    The real problem with motorcycles and turns is that since a motorcycle leans over, the tires must be very rounded. And the more you turn, the smaller patch of rubber you are running on. With cars, since they don't lean a lot, the bottoms of the wheels can be flat and thus you keep most of the rubber on the road in a turn.

    It's a huge advantage for the car.

    A two-wheeled vehicle would have an advantage in that less rubber on the road means less friction, which is very important in a gravity race.

    But I think the real reasons bike riders can go faster than these vehicles are two-fold. First is that they have a lot longer slope (and probably steeper) to go down. This course was a half-mile long. That means, they are on-course perhaps 80 seconds, and drop perhaps 800 feet in that time? Second is that the bikes are not strictly gravity powered. They pedal at the top to get up speed quicker and they can pedal after every corner they brake at to get their speed back quicker.

    They really should have let two bicyclists do this course, one with pedaling and another with gravity only. That would give us some more info to analyze and BS about.

    Acutally, it isn't like they destroyed this hill after the race. Someone could go down there and try it...

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  31. Re:only up to certain pt it seems, then opp is tru by rampant+poodle · · Score: 1

    That was the best answer yet. Motorcycles have two fairly small, oval-shaped contact patches connecting their tires to the road. As someone else has mentioned, they generate cornering force by camber change, (which requires a round profile).

    Cars have four much larger tires. They, (ideally), stay square to the road and therefore can be made with a tread that is quite wide in relation to the size of the tire. In short more contact area == more force can be applied. (Yes the coefficient of friction and the force applied to the tire matter as well but those would lead to an excessivly long comment.)

    On the other hand, even street motorcycles have amazing power to weight ratios. This can give them a good edge in acceleration. The limitations imposed by contact patch still apply but a good rider can accelrate like the proverbial scalded cat.

    Almost forgot -- In a gravity based event the real enemy is going to be air resistance. I'd put my money on the two wheeler as it probably has a smaller cross section.

  32. one last observation.. by somewhere+in+AU · · Score: 1

    A lot of the theory on contact patches, various forces etc are also horribly manipulated and influenced by the road surface (bumpy and otherwise) and of course what you find ON it! (sand, oil/diesel - god forbid!)

    The upshot is that in a couple of closed stage road events where I've driven hard charging cars on road tires (Subaru STi, Nissan GT-R) you'd NEVER survive trying that on m/bike!

    The cars can take an absolute pounding, compensate for bumps,dips,holes and with AWD esp go like a scalded cat all because of wheels and rubber everywhere.. whereas doing/trying that on a bike will just get you killed quickly.

    so going wayyyyy back to grandparent+ poster where said they used support mbikes as were faster than cars in corners would only apply if cars were some bongo van with drinks esky in the back ;-) .. of course the said cars aren't going into attack mode and at anything less than insane speed on marginal roads it Is simply easier to go faster, overall, on a bike and 99% of cars.

    all good fun!

    Alex.

  33. bedraces @ lehigh by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    dunno if the frats @ lehigh still have bedraces, but i helped build & test the 1st go-kart style bed;-) most frats just stuck bicycle wheels on a bedframe, steering by yanking it around turns. since the only requirement was a 'mattress', we gutted a little one & rolled the cover up behind the seat;-)

    lehigh's campus is on a hill, although the race didn't have much of a downhill run, i of course had 2 test it from the top;-) @ nite, of course, the better 2 c oncoming cars around the hairpin turns...where i discovered the short wheelbase gave it spectacular oversteer;-)