Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Eco-Cities

opencity writes "The Guardian is reporting on a deal by Arups, a British consulting firm, to build four eco-cities in China. The cities are to be self-sufficient in energy, water and most food products, with the aim of zero emissions of greenhouse gases in transport systems. The press release hints at some of the technology."

6 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. The press release is dated 24/8/2005 ... by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Recycled news is green too, I suppose ....

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  2. Also Known As Arcologies... by bc90021 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For more information check this link as a starting place.

  3. Re:We can all breathe a bit easier by andy+jenkins · · Score: 3, Informative

    China's not bound by the Kyoto Protocol, but they've approved and ratified it.

  4. Re:We can all breathe a bit easier by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, the US didn't use slave labor or virtual slave labor to industrialize. Slave labor was used for agribusiness in the South while the North was industrialized without slavery.

    Unless you count factory workers as slaves, which they weren't even if one takes everything The Jungle teaches us.

  5. Re:Biodome by thisislee · · Score: 2, Informative

    A failed biodome fails, where a failed arcology would be an ecologically friendly but not zero emission city.

  6. Re:We can all breathe a bit easier by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why per capita? Why not per square foot?

    Or why not per dollar of GDP? Measuring pollution by GDP actually represents an interesting metric of production efficiency, and on that scale China is very poor indeed, although the US and Canada are at best middling (on par with nations like Brazil, Sri Lanks and Mexico. It's Japan and various European countries that fare best.

    Jedidiah.