Microsoft brings CRM 3.0 launch date forward
Rob writes "The launch date for Microsoft CRM 3.0 has shifted again, and the application is now set
to launch in December instead of early next year as was previously planned. Version 3.0
was originally scheduled to be released to manufacturing in March 2006, but was then
pulled back so it would be generally available in January 2006. Now the release is slated
for general availability in early December, although that only applies to the English
version. Foreign language versions will follow. The earlier release date is a result
of a combination of conservative guidance and Microsoft being ahead of its testing
milestones. Several hundred partners have been testing the code
and providing feedback since September, and there are also several early-adopter customer."
12 minutes and no comments. For MS' sake I hope CRM 3.0 (whatever that is) is more successful.
Trolling is a art,
"Customer Relationship Management", apparently. Though that doesn't really explain what is actually *does*...
We're using a esynergy CRM system here at work. Its ok, but one of our complaints has been integration problems. Oh and the fact that its crashing a lot. The crashing issue seems to be unique to our compan however, so I expect it will get resolved soon. Anyways CRM systems are fairly complex, but ore importantly-they tend to be fairly specific to each organization, and often require customization. Can Microsoft work at that level? I have a hard time seeing it.
Welcome to the official Slashdot "Nobody gives a rat's ass" thread.
It also features some of the nicest AJAX I've seen.
Development: "Nobody wants CRM, anyway we're busy"
Marketing: "You will do it, only we can't be bothered to spec it out properly"
Development: "OK, here's your half-assed CRM system."
Sales: "Product can't be right, nobody wants it."
Slashdot: "CRM? Nobody gives a flying sexual intercourse."
Google, Amazon.com etc: "Oh yes they do, but it needs to be an in-house, business driven and tightly integrated solution, not some third party kludge. "
Pining for the fjords
Because I love paying for Windows and Microsoft Exchange licenses, and having all of my data tied into proprietary formats? I'm doing all I can to look for a real open source alternative to Exchange to avoid exactly that situation because although Microsoft does make damn fine products (Exchange is great considering the feature set, you will never convince me otherwise) I am disliking their anti-customer stance and their vendor-lock mechanisms (keeping formats completely proprietary and EULAs forbidding reverse engineering of the formats - MY data - etc.) more and more every day.
So what did I do for a CRM solution? I looked at Microsoft CRM, which was a free ad-on for M$ Exchange/Outlook/SQL Server, and I looked at SugarCRM. The choice was clear and so we went with SugarCRM. I did not discover vTiger (a fork of SugarCRM) until after we implemented SugarCRM but it's been working out fine for us, and once I upgrade it to the latest version we will be able to get even more use out of it and hopefully get good processes (help tickets, etc.) into place in one centralized (and open and documented) location.
The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
We tried sugar but the model didn't fit our buisness.
We spoke with many sales reps who tought the methology within sugar for moving people through the various sales stages didn't make correct sense.
We gave sugar a good go but ended up settling with salesforce.com. If sugar improves we will be right back there but for the time being it's a nice try but without a true understanding of how the buisness model realy works.
I'm interested to try out MS CRM and see if it's any good, also the possibilites of this being used as a shared hosted solution maybe.
As an aside, it's funny how many slashdoters are seemingly not in the IT industry, show by the fact they don't even know what a CRM system is. Not that I ever doubted it.
Slashdot, yesterdays opinions on todays topics.