Leaked Pictures of Socket F
Robbedoeske writes "Dutch language site Tweakers.net has the first pictures of AMD's Socket F, aka Socket 1207. This socket introduces support for DDR 2 memory and some say it will offer the ability for a integrated PCI Express controller on the cpu. Socket F is meant to be used in systems with more than one Opteron cpu."
If true, it is interesting to see AMD moving to pin grid array-style cpu connection. Intel has used this for a little while now with thier socket 775 Pentium 4 chips. While there was concern over broken pins resulting in unusable motherboards, it now seems to be a relatively robust mechanism. I wonder what advantages AMD saw that lead them to this design. I also wonder if their Socket M, 940 pin solution for next years Athlons will use the same socket design.
Personally I never imagined integrating a PCI Express controller in a CPU. If this trend of intregation continues, what would be the next logical step?
http://img259.imageshack.us.nyud.net:8090/my.php?i mage=0015ep.jpg
http://img259.imageshack.us.nyud.net:8090/my.php?i mage=0024yp.jpg
http://img259.imageshack.us.nyud.net:8090/my.php?i mage=0032cd.jpg
Just in case
Yay. I'm still on the fence if all of these different sockets are a good thing or not. I've gone from Socket 7 to Super Socket 7 to Socket A over the course of the last several years. Now it seems that there are way too many different sockets to choose from, and who knows which will show the same kind of longevity that my past choices have. What's a guy to do?
I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
Err... am I the only one who thinks that the perspective on the two "halves" of the socket is completely wrong? Take a good look at the angle at which the pins on the left hand side of the 3rd image appear to be sticking up - and then compare it to the last row of the right hand side.
The whole pin area looks too "flat" as well...
Thanks for the readable translation.
I wonder why AMD isn't just skipping DDR2 and going straight to FB-DIMM?
Maybe FB-DIMM will only be for really big 4+ CPU systems? Maybe FB-DIMM negates advantages of integrated memory controller?
Since when did technical superiority have anything to do with market dominance????
How the hell can AMD be making such better chips and companies like Dell still selling Intel powered crap?
Quite easy when you realize that that majority of consumers don't actually use the full capacity of their CPU very often. If you look at games the GPU is far more important than the CPU, which leaves heavy CPU use to media encoders, compilers and scientic processing. That's not really a big share of the market.
Civ4 mins: 1.2 GHz or equivalent
SW Battlefront II mins: 1.5 GHz or equivalent
Call of Duty II mins: Pentium IV 1.4GHz or AMD Athlon 1.4 GHz or equivalent
Age of Empires III: 1.4 GHz equivalent or higher processor or equivalent
F.E.A.R. mins: Pentium(R) 4 - 1.7 GHz or equivalent
Sims 2: 800 MHz processor or equivalent
Quake 4: 2.0 Ghz or equivalent
Those are some of the latest games released. PIV 2.0GHz was shipping in june 2002, so they are over three years behind the state of the art. And games are normally the most intense apps a user has. Basicly, an Intel machine does pretty much everything a computer user wants to do, so does an AMD. The rest is simply mindshare and momentum. Intel can drop their prices at any time if the market is slipping. They are simply balancing out taking out extra profit versus the threat AMD poses. If they don't watch out, they'll take a spanking in the professional market though, where admins are much more aware of what they're buying...
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Even the dutch text was badly written, so excuses for the grammar and spelling. It's always hard to translate anything other than your own thoughts
Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.