SCO Demands Linux 2.7 Information
dr_d_19 writes "According to Groklaw, SCO is now demanding IBM to turn over 'all documents concerning IBM's contributions to the Linux 2.7 kernel, including development work'. Of course, there is no 2.7 kernel and no plans at all to create one."
Not likely...
The transcripts of the orals give them saying clearly "2.7" in the discussions of the filing.
That means that the Lawyer in question either didn't do his work going into the hearing, relying on the content of the filing- or he genuinely believes there's a 2.7 version. Either way, that doesn't reflect well upon SCO's Counsel.
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
If anyone is wondering what the hell is he talking about: John Titor.
Funny joke, BTW.
There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()