Slashdot Mirror


Using Gravity To Tow Asteroids

cryptocom writes "Space.com is reporting that two scientists at NASA are proposing using a 20-ton spacecraft to pull asteroids off a possible collision course with Earth, using the spacecraft's own gravity as an attractor. This idea would not only be cheaper, but have a much higher chance of success, due to not having to actually land on the asteroid's surface."

12 of 508 comments (clear)

  1. How exciting, sort of by phpm0nkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The kind of spacecraft we've talked about could move an asteroid 650 feet (200 meters) across provided we have decades of advanced warning,"

    Neat... although, if this works, it will totally kill the Hollywood "asteroid catastrophe" genre. The concept of sitting a giant hunk of metal next to an asteroid for 20 years to gradually shift its path doesn't exactly make for fast-paced, high-tension action movie fare.

  2. Re:The mother of all asteroid deflection devices by lightyear4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think you should place a price upon the value of saving civilization.

  3. Re:The mother of all asteroid deflection devices by Gulthek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe to stop a huge asteroid from impacting on the Earth's surface the cost would be quite reasonable.

    I.e. I don't think that world leaders would look at the figures and go "Hrmmmmm...when you say extinct...how extinct?"

  4. 20-ton spacecraft collisions by Spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, the asteroids miss the earth, but damage from falling 20-ton spacecraft becomes an issue.

    --
    "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
  5. i've been away for a few days.... by shrewd · · Score: 3, Funny

    this isn't a follow-up story to "asteroid on collision coarse with earth" IS IT!?!?

  6. I tried this... by novus+ordo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...with women, but I've had mixed success(wrong body part got gravitationally attracted to my face).

    --
    "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  7. Re:Interesting Concept by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Having it slam into the Earth would be one way.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  8. Re:The mother of all asteroid deflection devices by GryMor · · Score: 4, Funny

    'Hoovering' isn't going to work, suction is just the difference between a high presure area and a low presure area. In order to 'hoover' in this environment you would need to have a zone inside the space craft with a presure lower than the presure outside the spacecraft. The presure outside the spacecraft is aproximately 0, so, good luck with creating an area of negative pressure (which would require a negative number of atoms, a negative absolute temperature or a negative volume...)

    --
    Realities just a bunch of bits.
  9. Re:The mother of all asteroid deflection devices by AnonymousKev · · Score: 5, Funny
    > I.e. I don't think that world leaders would look at the figures and go "Hrmmmmm...when you say extinct...how extinct?"

    You've obviously never been in a scheduling meeting with management.

    --
    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997
    (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
  10. Re:that's what i was thinking by Wog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nuke the moon!

  11. Why not move the earth? by HermanAB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never mind moving the objects, just move the earth out of the way. Just mount an engine on the north and south poles. No need for any space travel. This can be done at ground level. A pair of coal fired steam jets should do it.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  12. News for Nerds? by darklordyoda · · Score: 3, Funny
    An asteroid called Apophis has a chance of hitting Earth, and I don't see one Stargate SG-1, or by extension, MacGuyver joke.

    I'm disappointed in you, Slashdot nerds. For shame!