IPv6 Still Hotly Debated

inkslinger77 writes "A significant stumbling block to IPv6 adoption may be IPv4 loyalists who are keen to keep the old protocol in preference to the 'new improved' version, according to a Computerworld Australia article. The article covers the views of Cisco's senior technical leader for IPv6 technologies, Tony Hain and Geoff Huston, a senior Internet research scientist from Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (Apnic)." From the article: "Go to your favourite venture capitalist and say 'I want to be an ISP'. By the time he stops laughing and [finds you want to run] IPv6 - the discussion gets terminated. No one wants to hear this. IPv6 is well ahead of adoption in this market so everyone is deferring. No one is running IPv6, because there is no business case for it ... if we really wanted to leave a legacy to our children we'd review the crap we have today which is pretty ghastly ..."

Comments

The IPv4 scarcity issue is a myth

[Snarfangel]

There are plenty of addresses in northern Alaska that aren't being used. "Peak IPv4" indeed.

Why doesn't Slashdot support it yet?

[caluml]

calum@www1 calum $ ping6 www.slashdot.org
unknown host
calum@www1 calum $

Cmon, Slashdot. insmod ipv6.o

Re:Why doesn't Slashdot support it yet?

[Slowping]

which leads to the question... if Slashdot converts to IPv6 and only accepts IPv6 connections, how quickly would the rest of the Internet get changed?