End Of Days Compensation Packages?
Waiting for the Axe to Fall asks: "I work for a larger webhosting company that has plans to consolidate one of its west coast data centers with an east coast location which they already have in place. Forget that this is a bad idea in terms of geographical redundancy--it is going to happen. The company did inform all west coast employees about the move, roughly a year in advance. This was done Im sure to ease the shock and fear of loosing ones job. This affects a small group (8-9) of employees, all of whom are tied up in operations and the data center specifically. If you were in this situation (as one of the employees), what would you require/want/wish for in this retention plan? The benefits of staying with the company, until the end, must out weight the risk of being jobless; or is this not the path you would choose? Would you leave as soon as the announcement was made?"
"As employees, the group decided to go to management and request a 'retention plan' of sorts. This is a contract that outlines specific benefits to stay with the company through the move, and help getting the systems across the country without service interruption. The support of these few is a requirement, due to the vast array of legacy and non standard systems. The job could otherwise be done with consultants, however going this route would take substantially longer, and would be at a much greater cost to the company. So, it is truly in their best interests to have the staff that has managed these systems for the past 5-8 years stick it out."
Because if your resume is as grammatically flawed as your post then you're going to be serving me fries w/ my Big Mac.
that your "End of Days Compensation Package" is largely determined by your religious beliefs, your compliance to the requirements of those beliefs, and whether or not those religious beliefs are actually backed up by a real God/gods/force/FSM/great nothingness/etc. But I guess you were just talking about losing your job.
Thats' one of the /. editors job's. Alongs with re-posting stories ad nausesm, there also their two ensure that grammer (and upon occasion speling) is held in compleat contempt.
"1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
we are.
screw you.