Mandriva Linux 2006 Review Continued
Anonymous Coward writes "The second part of the extensive Linux Tips for Free Mandriva Linux 2006 review has been published, going into details about the state of Linux hardware support and compatibility, hardware configuration and software with a whole section on digital photography. Part one was previously discussed on Slashdot."
I'm not making a stab at the quality of the article here, but this seems to be like a little bit of self promotion. I mean, http://www.mandrake.tips.4.free.fr? http://www.when.was.this.in.style.com? And the poster comes from the website.
/.
Please don't mod this up or down, I'm just saying that I find there's something wrong with how this story got on
I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Not Mandriva specific, since all of the distrobutions and packages are guilty to some degree, but this is a perfect example of what's wrong with the Linux desktop. Mandriva pops up a window when you connect a digital camera to give you the option of importing your photos. Great! But the title bar reads "Warning". No problem for us geeks, but now, think Grandma. What is she going to do when she gets a warning? Will she think that an error has occurred? Perhaps. That's why these dialog boxes need to have the polish and unified feel that they do on XP or OS X.
And you are a conspiracy theorist. Check my post earlier: Free.fr is just an ISP offering free hosting, the Website creator just used the domain name to create a pseudo "vanity host". Nothing wrong. Quite funny, in fact, who would ever pay for Mandrake tips anyway? :)
Well, for one, the for-pay distribution target mostly businesses so a loss at the individual level (home user) is not so important - and Businesses want peace of mind that comes with support.
Also, there are licenses that for-pay distributions have to pay to be allowed to distribute. This isn't in the base linux system but stuff like various non-free multimedia codecs or the nonfree mp3 format IIRC. It's too much hassle for businesses to track these down but they don't want to be caught with their pants down if a software audit ever comes in. Enter Redhat/whover, they took care of this already.
Notice that distros like Ubuntu have you download this stuff from other repositories and not their own, meaning that you are responsible for having the correct licenses. For a home user, this is not likely going to be a risk, but the business owner is well to cover is ass.
In my experience, (current Ubuntu user), the distro that autodetects the most stuff for you is the easiest^_^ And all package based major distros are all about the same amount of work getting something to work if it's not autodetected. Source based distros like Gentoo can be another can of worms, I'm not sure.
What kind of keyboard you have that you need to look at the source code to switch them around?
???
Now, Mandriva is one distro with it's act together. No text-mode installer or arcane package manager syntax for Mandriva - it's the *easiest* distro you'll ever run. But that comes at a price, because it's also *hardest* for a developer to create an interface that's a smooth, seamless uh.. $EXPERIENCE than it is to just make the damn program work already and slap the command line interface on it with a shell script wrapper.
Not everyone, I'm still on Mandriva. I know everyone says it's just for new people, but no one has given me a reason to switch: SuSE's YaST screws up hand-edited config files, Fedora requires much more set up to get running, and Ubuntu--why? Slackware and Gentoo just don't make sense for a laptop user who upgrades frequently. So why the beef with Mandriva--what's the downside? Everything they write is GPL, too.
Besides, Mandriva has a fairly good community, as I'll demonstrate here by reiterating my offer to provide free email/IM support to any Slashdot-reading Mandriva user (or potential switcher). I'm not a kernel-hacker or anything, but I have been using it on desktops, laptops, and servers for 4 years now, and I can fix most things when they break.
U.S. War Crimes blog. Email for free Mandriva support.
Naturally, it took some time to get back in the top 20 for Mandriva Linux since the name change (and why would I be whoring for 'Mandrake' anyway - the name has gone the way of the dodo), but that too has happened without being on Slashdot.
What is this obsession with figuring out conspiracies anyway? The real conspiracy is that I want to show how cool Linux is, in this case with the example of Mandriva 2006.
Enjoy Linux,
Rob
www.mandrake.tips.4.free.fr
For those who want to try this brand-new version, ISO images (CD,DVD, mini-CD and live-CD) of the 2006 have hit public FTP mirrors last week-end (note: the x86-64 version only comes as a 3-CD and mini-CD image). Tip: right after a fresh install, don't forget to apply all security and bugfixes updates if you want a secure and stable system.
Download mirrors are listed here.
All 2006 reviews have been summarized here.
you'll be up and running before you even get mandrake^H^H^H^Hriva iso's downloaded
Actualy, it will be faster to be up and running with Mandriva.
You can either download only one ISO image, or you can download the 12MB ISO for a network install, with fully GUI installer and all. I believe that debian netinstall ISO was around 85 MB.
This way, you can start installation after just downloading and burning an 12MB ISO.
And as for the software available for Mandriva, you have 12306 packages, plus the PLF packages.
So, right now, both Debian and Mandriva have more or less the same (very high) number of packages readily available with urpmi (CLI) / rpmdrake (GUI)
Peace