Slashdot Mirror


Canada Unveils Internet Surveillance Legislation

An anonymous reader writes "Michael Geist is reporting on his blog that the Canadian government today introduced new legislation that would require ISPs to establish new surveillance controls to monitor Internet activity. The bill will also require ISPs to disclose subscriber information without a warrant. The bill may not survive given the state of the government, but this is a sad indicator of things to come."

2 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. IANAL by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Canadian Constitution says:
    8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

    5. IS A WARRANTLESS SEARCH OR SEIZURE ALWAYS UNREASONABLE?
    S.8 protects a persons right to be secure against unreasonable searches and/or seizures. There is no constitutional warrant requirement. If there was a constitutional warrant requirement s.8 would state "Everyone has the right to be secure against warrantless search or seizure". However, the Supreme Court of Canada has adopted the position that all warrantless searches are prima facie unreasonable. What this proposition enunciates is that when a search is conducted in the absence of a warrant (prior judicial authorization) the search will be presumed to be "unreasonable" and therefore a violation of s.8 of the Charter.
  2. Europe risks becoming silly too by Christian+Engstrom · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is an overwhelming risk that Europe will get the same kind of privacy invading legislation through the Data Retention Directive.

    If you are a European citizen you can sign a petition against the directive here.

    According to a joint newspaper article by Swedish MEPs Charlotte Cederschiöld (conservative) and Jonas Sjöstedt (socialist) that was published some months ago, the only thing that can stop the directive is feedback to the politicians from the general public on the same scale as the software patents directive generated. I don't know if they are right in their assessment, but signing the petition against the directive is at least a first step.

    Personally, I would also like to see the European ISPs becoming more active and start spending some real money on lobbying.

    As long as it's only the old dinosaurs with pre-Internet business models that are spending lobbying money in Brussels/Washington/Ottawa/Canberra, we will continue to see bad pieces of legislation getting passed everywhere. It's time for a new generation of businesses to realize that politics don't take care of themselves, and that if you let the bad guys' lobbyists rein unopposed, there is a bill to be paid for it later.

    --
    Christian Engström, Former Member of the European Parliament 2009-2014 for The Pirate Party, Sweden