Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice.Org in a Corporate Environment?

robpoe asks: "I've been working on a rollout plan for OpenOffice.org 2.0 for a medium sized network. This network runs a number of different MS Office versions, and we absolutely must retain the Microsoft Office 97/2000/2002 file formats (for interoperability with the public and other entities). Getting our versions of Office to 2003 is $65k+, so we're looking closely at OOo. The problem is, since OOo keeps track of changes per user, and we have users that move around (and no, Roaming Profiles are not an option for us), and you cannot expect a user to change those preferences on every computer they log in to. Let's hear some great deployment plans for keeping the default file type, and even general rollout plans. How are you doing it?" "It seems that nobody has done this (or documented it) that I've found. Let's see if we can get a good thing going by documenting a good, easy to manage rollout plan. Oh, and the default for saving files has to remain in Office 97/2k/xp format.

What are you using to deploy OOo automatically on your network. Assume that we have capability of login script (batch files / registry changes), but no SMS/ZenWorks/etc.

5 of 376 comments (clear)

  1. Use the source, Luke? by marimbaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I imagine it can't be too difficult to build your own distro of OOo that saves in MS Office format by default.

  2. in other news.... by mulcher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For $65k you should be able to bargain with MSFT somehow. Academia does it by department which should be far less than what you pay... and it is department negoiated, not University wide. In other news, expect a slashdot article in a month stating that "I got fired for installing OO 2.0 on our corp. network".

    MS Office doesn't even work with highly complex objects and docs... even between versions or across different computers.

  3. My OO.o tips by saskboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm far from an expert, but I've been using OO.o for over two years now.

    My first tip is at home or for basic users, you can go into
    Tools
    Options
    Java
    Disable the Java, and your startup time is almost certainly going to improve.
    [Another Slashdotter showed me this trick, and it apparently disables macros or something I don't use much if ever.]

    I install OO.o on a computer, and log into the profile that will run it, hit enter a few times to accept the agreement, and say I've already registered then proceed. This loads the quickstarter into the Startup, and if MS Antispyware is running it might even ask if you want it to run every time.

    Since I image computers and roll out a standard image when a machine needs redoing, I don't worry about standard config settings yet. Most machines I put it on don't have Word, so I set OO to automatically open Word files, when I install it.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  4. Portable OOo! by thecampbeln · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is exactly what I was going to suggest (but some dumb ass modders downgraded both threads that mention it!?) Just in case the parent falls off, here is the URL.

    Despite what the parent says, you DO NOT NEED TO PUT THIS ON A THUMBDRIVE! All it really equates to is a fully preconfigured and compartimentalized "install" of OOo. Need to update it? No worries, roll out a new version (or a diff) of the changed files. Everything is housed under the one directory.

    I use the portable version of FireFox and Thunderbird for myself and the inlaws because you can always guarentee that you've got all of the config files and user data (bookmarks and emails in their cases) under the one folder, so backups and updates are 100x easier (least for me). YMMV, but it's worht a look!!

    --
    "1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
  5. Re:Bite the bullet by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    $65k, depending on where you're located, could be much cheaper then the amount of money you'll have to spend on supporting Open Office.

    Where is this magical world people are from in which MS Office works out of the box and doesn't require support? I "tech guy" for about 20 small organizations and as of this last invoice 65% of my time is supporting people on MS Office (90% if you count Outlook) because it freezes / craps out / corrupts their files / won't open older versions / won't open newer versions / does weird things where bullets aren't all the same size / messes up multi-column calculations half the time but not the other half of the time / etc.

    Do you really work with MS Office installations that don't require support?

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted