Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

'Open Source Media' vs 'Open Source Media, Inc'

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the in-the-grim-future-of-hello-kitty-words-are-weapons dept.

Karl writes "Last week OSM (Open Source Media) launched to what some are calling an odd start. Most notably naming a controversy has ensued with Christopher Lydon's public radio show Open Source, a production of Open Source Media, Inc.."

2 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Communist Propaganda Media by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As opposed to "news" from the American propaganda agencies (eg. FOX News, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC)?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  2. Ad-hominem attacks are for the logically impaired by jgardn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your whole comment is an ad-hominem attack. First, Charles Johnson is not a racist, and neither is Michelle Malkin. And Islamofascism is not a race--it's an ideology, a dark and sinister one that has spread terrorism throughout the ages. I would be surprised if you could find anyone who thinks the idea of a global caliphate is a good one! You should educate yourself on what Osama bin Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi really want. Hint: If they win this war, we won't be allowed to show photographs of women, vote in a free election, drink alcohol, speak our mind, charge or pay interest, or challenge a moslem in court!

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.