Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

'Open Source Media' vs 'Open Source Media, Inc'

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the in-the-grim-future-of-hello-kitty-words-are-weapons dept.

Karl writes "Last week OSM (Open Source Media) launched to what some are calling an odd start. Most notably naming a controversy has ensued with Christopher Lydon's public radio show Open Source, a production of Open Source Media, Inc.."

4 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. OSM Is Chinese Communist Party Mouthpiece by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

    OSM is the rightwing American news source fronting for Xinhua, the official Chinese mafia government news agency. Now the "neocon" destruction of American integrity, wealth, labor and unity makes sense: they're selling us out to the Chinese.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  2. Re:Many of them are also shameless racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    What a shameless, dishonest distortion! Charles Johnson has never advocated those things, and you know it. LGF is a community of people, and there are people there who have, indeed, espoused that disgusting attitude you just talked about.. kill them all! And they have been shot down, told to shut it, called bad names, etc, by most of the regulars at LGF. As far as Charles Johnson himself advocating mass murder, I dare you to find a single damn piece of evidence of that. You won't. You will find disgust at Islamacism, at the death oriented culture of the Islamic societies in the middle east. If you consider that racism you are frigging pea-brained tool.

  3. Re:Communist Propaganda Media by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Actually, all of those companies are very much American. The parent companies may be multinational, but that doesn't change the fact that the ones listed above are American. As for your comment about CNN, you do realize that CNN was started by Ted Turner and is based in Atlanta, GA, right? Don't let the British accent fool you. Thanks for being yet another ignorant American...

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
  4. Racism = Socialist Liberalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    taxonomy = a map of classes. It's pure blown socialist thinking. Persons are individuals.

    Race has nothing to with skin color. However, Liberal Socialist elite masters easily convince the peasant commoners (masses as they so derogatorily refer to them) that race equals skin.

    Race has to do with Political Faction -- the process of persons forming a well-organized group to secure for themselves political spoils through power. A race is a run to a finish line where the winner gets the riches.

    In the US, racist groups -- political faction -- include feminists, political homosexist heterophobes, black caucuses (urban ghetto plantations run by liberal socialist), language caucuses (mostly Spanish-related) and religion caucuses like High Priests of Academia Science and others.

    All of these racists seek one thing, to secure through income taxation and subsidy, wealth, at the expense of the unorganized mass of commoners, typical males of Anglo-Viking origin.