Hardcore Offer Mixed Verdict At Xbox 360 Zero Hour
News for nerds writes "Next Generation magazine runs a quick report for the Xbox 360 Zero Hour launch event. According to avid Xbox fans joining the party in Mojave Desert, while games to be released in mid 2006 such as Gears of War and Ninety Nine Nights got positive reviews, the initial offers on 360 couldn't impress them as much." Kotaku has a pair of photo essays from the event.
The only game on the initial list that tickles-my-fancy is the Perfect Dark sequel. I loved the original.
Beyond that, nothing really looks that interesting and I would probably never buy most of the games the most basic "bundles" come with.
I've personally played Kameo, Perfect Dark Zero, and Call of Duty2. Without even touching the rest (including PGR3 which is receiving near perfect reviews) this is easily the best release lineup for a modern console.
The goal of a release lineup is to have enough games up front to be worth the early investment. There have been people lined up since before noon today at my local Best Buy - so I think the 360 has gone above and beyond that.
The graphics were dazzling, better than anything on the show floor. The second person style gameplay looked equally as exciting.
I haven't heard much about Gears of War (other than "OMG ITS GONNA BE AWSUMM!!!") but I'm assuming they meant third person perspective. Second person perspective is a narrative form that is pretty much already assumed while you are playing any video game.
Other launch titles didn't seem to impress gamers much. Tony Hawk: American Wasteland was barely touched and Sega's Condemned didn't have many players either. After a while, Kameo started to bring in a crowd of gamers who curiously watched, but didn't actually try the game out.
I found it interesting that people would go to this xbox 360 zero hour event and not even bother playing these launch titles... I mean, Condemned or Kameo may not have looked groundbreaking; but if I was at the event, I would have at least played them, as opposed to just curiously watching. Maybe that's just me. Not that I am at all surprised that the general summary of people's initial reactions to some of these titles was "same game, better graphics". Hopefully games like Gears of War and 99 Nights live up to being worthwhile games, I'm curious what the first batch of good (read: not just pretty) next gen games will be like.
Xbox fan: Microsoft is going to rule the online space with Xbox 360. The HD era of gaming is here RIGHT now and DVDs provide plenty of space for all that great content. While the Xbox was a good first start, the 360 is going to take the market by storm.
Sony fan: Yeah a PAY online service. What I have to PAY for the system and the game and I can't even play it online unless I PAY some more? The Xbox hardware is so pathetically underpowered compared to the Cell. As Sony will tell you, the PS3 with the Cell processor is considerably more important than the second coming of Christ. It will make gaming transcend gaming and games will go beyond gaming to become the pinnacle state of nirvana. It's going to rule so hard in a year no one will remember the Xbox.
Xbox fan: Two words: Halo 3
Sony fan: One word: overrated. Notice you only have one good game on the Xbox? ONE. Compared to the millions of titles available on PS2 which will be coming to PS3 in new even more awesomer forms.
Nintendo fan: Yeah but none of the games are FUN to play. Nintendo invented fun back in the 1600s and has made an art of refining it. Everything on the other systems is derivative of a Nintendo product. Just without cool characters like Mario and Peach (she's so cute). Sony and Microsoft couldn't innovate themselves out of a box. The Revolution will be televised. Inexpensive, innovative, interactive and FUN.
Sony Fan: Hahaha sure what will the launch title be? Mario Foosball?
Xbox Fan: LOL N00B! Yeah I liked Nintendo, back when I wore diapers.
Nintendo Fan: Laugh all you want while I'm enjoying games that can't be ported to your silly game pad based consoles.
PC Gamer: STFU all of you. HD era? You mean playing games at higher than 640x480 resolution. You make me laugh. Gamepads? Wireless wands? The mouse and keyboard are the ultimate controllers. Oh yeah and I can update my hardware while you're stuck for five years with the same old crap. Rule the online space? Sorry that battle was one on by the PC years ago. I got all the major TLAs: RPGs, MMOs, RTS, FPS.
Console Fans: Sure if you like to spend ten times the cost of a console just to play games? And deal with Windows crapping out while you play! And drivers that need to be updated! No thank you!
Linux Gamer: Frozen Bubble anyone? Round of Tux Racer?
Sometimes my arms bend back.
Didn't the original Xbox and PS2 cost in the $200-250 range? I seem to remember something like $250 and then a rapid descent to $199 and then to $99.
... this thing's pricey. Color me a big-time skeptic.
So it seems brain-dead to charge $399 for a console unless you're just going to hardcore customers and leaving everyone else out in the cold.
With the PS3 allegedly at $300 I see a lot of reasons to sit back and wait.
Well, other than the fact that you have to give your kid SOME kind of snazzy Christmas gift and the Xbox is available. In that way, it seems like MS has really outmanuvered Sony.
But still
D
Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
With retail XBox360, with all default settings and on first lap of race track on Project Gotham Racing 3, single player, crashed 3 times in a row.
4 /6 /8 /9 /6 /7 /
So far haven't been able to play one track without crashing...
Here are some screenshots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/6599015
http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/6599015
http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/6599015
http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/6599015
http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/6599596
http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/6599596
FUCK YOU NIGGERS