Slashdot Mirror


Darwin Evolving Into A Tricky Exhibit

rbochan writes "The new Darwin Exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History has 'failed to find a corporate sponsor in the United States because American companies are anxious not to take sides in the heated debate between scientists and fundamentalist Christians over the theory of evolution' according to articles at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Telegraph, and The Register. The $US3 million needed for the exhibit was met by private charitable donations."

3 of 1,364 comments (clear)

  1. Here's the ticket by Chickenofbristol55 · · Score: 5, Funny
    'failed to find a corporate sponsor in the United States because American companies are anxious not to take sides in the heated debate between scientists and fundamentalist Christians over the theory of evolution'

    I think Darwin's theory needs to evolve to survive in its ever changing environment.

    --
    public class null extends java applet { System.out.print ("Tabula Rasa"); }
  2. Making Evolution palatable to Fundamentalist Chris by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Funny
    $sys$Evolution.

    Now only the geeks will learn about it.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  3. Re:You're in the minority. by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Funny
    Even if you'd deal with a company that helped fund such an exhibit, it is quite plausible that they'd lose many times that gain if there were a boycott by the religious factions.

    Now there's an Idea...

    Since the Pharma industry is based heavily on biology and bio-chemistry and in turn on theories of evolution, maybe we could start a campaign to equate medical drug use with support of evolution. Hit the zealots where they live (literally) by accusing them of supporting, by act, the theory of evolution if they take any medical drugs. Suggest if they really do not support evolution, they should forgo their medicine.

    Then sit and watch the fallout. Some will bow to self preservation, continue using their medicine and dissapear from public view. Others might actually stop using their drugs. Either way, they are less likely to be a public problem.

    I'm only suggesting this to the most vocal public critics. Hit them where they live, their public image. Alas, the probable effect is that lots of little old ladies would take it too literally and stop taking their own medicine in support. That would be a bad situation, even if it was of their own making.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.