Darwin Evolving Into A Tricky Exhibit
rbochan writes "The new Darwin Exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History
has 'failed to find a corporate sponsor in the United States because American companies are anxious not to take sides in the heated debate between scientists and fundamentalist Christians over the theory of evolution' according to articles at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Telegraph, and The Register. The $US3 million needed for the exhibit was met by private charitable donations."
ID is Evolution. Anybody who says differently is either:
not being honest with you, or
not being honest with themselves.
Means about the same as your argument. And it's funny that you say this:
The oh-so-predictable Ad Hominem attacks aside, excluding such claptrap as astrology and ID from the realm of scientific discourse is not because of bigotry...it is because astrology and ID are not science. Take your persecution complex elsewhere, thanks.
Claiming that something is not science without actually examining the evidence for it is the very definition of bigotry and prejudice. So no- you've failed to convince anybody of anything, and in fact, repeated the error.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.