Slashdot Mirror


Podcasting Hacks

jsuda writes "Podcasting appears to be one of the more interesting developments in current culture and technology. It is one of the earliest nonbusiness representations of the value and power of XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is subtly and quietly being used to link digital documents together, and more significantly, databases, much like the Internet itself linked individual computers into a global network." Read on for the rest of Jsuda's review. Podcasting Hacks: Tips & Tools for Blogging Out Loud author Jack D. Herrington pages 428 publisher O'Reilly Media Inc. rating 8 reviewer John Suda ISBN 0-596-10066-3 summary Good primer on Podcasting

The power of XML is yet to be fully recognized, but its expression in podcasting has far-reaching effects and consequences all by itself. Way beyond extending audio distribution over the Internet and providing relatively easy access for creative types to a global distribution channel, podcasting may alter and extend the distribution of content in ways never experienced before, having repercussions for political communication, social expression, and democracy itself.

Podcasting can be considered, in general, a melding of several elements: digital audio, weblogs, radio, Tivo-like recording/playing devices, and RSS (Really Simple Syndication). RSS is the protocol extending XML allowing creators to publish content to audiences who can easily subscribe and partake remotely in both space and time. It is much more than merely an alternative to conventional radio.

Given all of this asserted importance, the new book, Podcasting Hacks: Tips & Tools for Blogging Out Loud is perfectly timed to provide guidance on how to find, listen to, and subscribe to podcasts as well as how to create, publish, and market audio and video content. This is a comprehensive introduction to nearly all aspects of podcasting. It covers not only the technological elements but the content and creative elements as well. Much of the later material draws on analog sources like radio and television broadcasting. Many of the content elements are shared across the technology distinctions. Good interviewing techniques and content stylings, for example, are the same regardless of how produced and distributed. The major theme here is how to produce quality audio which can attract audiences via digital distribution over the now ubiquitous Internet.

The book has 11 chapters covering how to find podcasts, starting out in listening and creating podcasts, producing quality sound, using formats, interviewing, blogging, publicity, basic editing, advanced audio, mobility, and video blogging.

The main author is Jack D. Herrington, a software engineer and developer and technology writer and reviewer. There are 20 other contributors to the book, including journalists, multimedia consultants, radio and video producers, web editors, and podcasters themselves, particularly several who have popularized the medium.

The book has two main focuses - how to find and listen to podcasts and how to produce your own. The later focus consumes most of the book and deals with producing the best sound (with the lowest noise), producing interesting content, marketing, getting involved in the community, and even how to get your audio masterpieces into syndication.

Although this book is part of the venerable O'Reilly series of Hacks, the 75 "hacks" contained here work more like captions for various sub topics under the podcasting rubric. The book is less a collection of individually-packaged solutions to discrete problems or issues, but a primer on the whole of podcasting.

The first two chapters provide a list of the best and most popular podcasts, and directions on how to search directories of podcasts on the web. Apple's iTunes software broadly popularized podcasting only a short while ago by including a built-in directory of podcasts in version 4.9 of iTunes. How to get and use the right podcaster for your interests is explained, as well as some recommendations of specific applications - iPodder gets good reviews. Hack #2 offers a perl script which allows one to aggregate and rebroadcast feeds from other sources. Hacks 3 & 4 also describe perl scripts to build your own podcasts and to import podcasts into iTunes, (both PC and Mac versions.)

Using perl scripts is not for everyone, but the content of this book is fairly broad, having interest and value for a wide range of technological types, from higher level geeks to the person who is only casually interested in this new technology and content. Throughout, when discussing common software applications, the authors pointedly cover each of the main platforms - Windows, Mac OSX, and Linux and both technical production and content. Hack 10, for instance. is a technological hack; it relates how to create your first podcast using the freeware, Audacity. Hack 11 is a content-related hack instructing how to produce the content of a podcast and how to understand the respective roles of producer, writer, engineer, host, editor, and performer.

Surprisingly, one can get started producing podcasts relatively easily using a very modest amount of hardware and a little software, including mostly freeware or modestly-priced applications. The authors go out of their way in many of the hacks to point out how to select and acquire production materials at low cost. They often recommend specific products and services making it as easy as possible for readers to believe they can actively participate in podcasting with relatively modest efforts and budget.

The segments on formats describes what a format is in terms of duration, structure, content, and production elements. Some of the many types of formats are itemized and described - news, story show, personal show, political, mystery science theater, music, sports, technology, and news. The segments for each of these contains information on important sources for content, examples of use, and tips for producing content. Each type has its own strengths, limitations, and pitfalls. An overly enthusiastic personal show, for example, can get you fired from your job if your boss accesses and hears something he/she doesn't like. (It has happened more than once, according to news resources).

There is an enormous amount of material presented in this book with excellent attention to details. The audio theater type of format, for example, includes an itemization of the structure of a typical show - the story, script, studio setup, performances (with directorial prompts), mixing and encoding audio, and even how to make your own sound effects. Hack 33 describes techniques professionals use in producing interviews - types of interviews, location considerations, preparing guests, interviewing techniques, using environment sound ambience, and even microphone techniques. A large handful of the contributors make reference to how to use microphones properly emphasizing the need to control wind, voice pops, environmental noises and the like. There is even guidance on training one's voice for audio (Hack #19).

Virtually every possible element of podcasting is noted in this book. Some other topics include: how to record telephone interviews, including Skype conversations (#34); how to podcast using blogs (with examples of HTML and XML coding); how to manage bandwidth (#39); how to use ID3 tags for your audio to facilitate searches (#40); how to market, connect with the community, and even how to make money while podcasting (#48-49).

More advanced topics are handled later in the book. Learn basic editing using the right audio tools in Hacks#50-58. Hack 61 details how to set up a home studio. A very interesting section tells how to be mobile while podcasting including making a small recording rig for travel as well as podcasting directly from your car while driving. (Sounds unsafe to me and illegal in some states, as noted by the authors). Other sections take up, directly and at length, the legalities of podcasting covering copyrights, libel, licensing, and more. An interesting explanation of Creative Commons licensing is contained in #67 - 68. To cap it all off, there is a useful glossary of digital and analog audio terminology and an index.

As you might expect, given the presence of 21 contributors, not all hacks are as good as some, and there is considerable repetition of some elements, like microphone handling, production concepts, and others. However, these are small quibbles for such an information- packed volume of modest cost."

You can purchase Podcasting Hacks from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

89 comments

  1. CSVs baby! by intmainvoid · · Score: 3, Funny
    The power of XML is yet to be fully recognized

    Bah! Everybody knows real men use csv files...

    1. Re:CSVs baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderated interesting, slashdot hasnt changed a bit.

      Bunch of poseurs who cant differentiate "geek" and "loser".

    2. Re:CSVs baby! by slim · · Score: 1

      Nah, REAL men use LISP lists.

    3. Re:CSVs baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "geek" == "loser"
      How do you differentiate identical things?

    4. Re:CSVs baby! by utnow · · Score: 1

      aww... he'th got LISP... don't be thuch a big thilly buns!!!

  2. Thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    For not writing it "eXtensible Markup Language". That's so annoying.

    1. Re:Thank you. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I agree with you

      "Xtreme Markup Language" is so much cooler.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Thank you. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      For not writing it "eXtensible Markup Language". That's so annoying.
      What's wrong with talking about eXtensible Markup Language as "eXtensible Markup Language?" Got something against eXtensible Markup Language? What has eXtensible Markup Language ever done to you?
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  3. Extension of the Blogging Culture by Gryle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First there were blogs which allowed to people to become amateur journalists and columnists. Now we have podcasting which allows people to become amatuer radio hosts and broadcasters. Probably the best evidence yet for the "Internet is the modern printing press" arguments.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    1. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by 2.7182 · · Score: 2

      Two points about the book though. Even though I like it, the binding cracked after a week, and also there are many typoes, especially in the index.

    2. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by plover · · Score: 3, Funny
      there are many typoes, especially in the index.

      I'm trying to figure out if this means you're an expert or if we shouldn't exactly trust your judgement on this one ...

      --
      John
    3. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes and no. Unlike blogs, podcasts are mostly one-way, none of the commenting, tagging and cross-linking that characterizes blogging. Podcasting is another form of content syndication. And yes, the technology is so simple now (I use a Yamaha UW500, a USB audio/midi recorder) that anyone with a computer can record themselves doing all kinds of things and slap it out on the Internet for anyone to see. (A hint to save you some bandwidth: if what you're doing is distributable via a Creative Commons license, you can have the Internet Archive host it for you.)

      Recording is easy. The tricky part is figuring out how to best build your feed. Besides the standard RSS tags, look at the iTunes extensions.

      Eric
      Just put out my first (long!) podcast

    4. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's British expert.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by KanSer · · Score: 1

      And then there were clueless people completely unaware of the fact that downloading and saving webcasts has been possible long before Apple even thought about joining the MP3 player market.

      People were also doing their own webcasts years before the iPod. So like, could we please stop giving Apple credit for stuff they didn't do? All they did was make it easy even for the dumbest person. And almost everyone on slashdot hates end users (especially those with admin jobs) so why would you cheer their empowerment? That's dangerous behaviour.

      So yes, the internet _is_ the new printing press but it's not Apple's fucking lovechild so could we all stop fellating them unnecessarily?

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    6. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And almost everyone on slashdot hates end users (especially those with admin jobs)

      How many end users do YOU know who have admin jobs?

    7. Re:Extension of the Blogging Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously! Besides, it's just confusing the things since "podcasting" is really when you throw an ipod into a lake in an attempt to drown apple fanbois who dive in after it.

      I propose a return to "mp3 download" with the optional "via rss syndication" labeling scheme that we've had for years.

  4. Uses XML by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny

    So it uses XML. Does this mean if I give Microsoft a whole lot of money for their latest Office product that I can PodCast Word documents now?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  5. Earliest nonbusiness XML use? by dorkygeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Podcasting appears to be one of the more interesting developments in current culture and technology. It is one of the earliest nonbusiness representations of the value and power of XML (Extensible Markup Language).
    One of the earliest?? Sorry, but what is this guy smoking??? There were a lot nonbusiness uses of XML long before Podcasts.

    --
    Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    1. Re:Earliest nonbusiness XML use? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Like... ?

  6. Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the hell do they call them pod"casts"? There is no "casting" involved -- it's a pull model, and always has been.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Pet peeve by TEMM · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just to piss you off...

    2. Re:Pet peeve by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why the hell do they call them pod"casts"? There is no "casting" involved -- it's a pull model, and always has been.

      Because podpulls sounds too much like pudpulls! Who would want to listen to a bunch of guys sitting around pulling their puds? ;)

    3. Re:Pet peeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And what's with the "pod"? There's no iPod involved either.

    4. Re:Pet peeve by randm.ca · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Also, where did the "pod" come from? Is it just because it makes "podcast" nicely rhyme with "broadcast". Why not "zodcast" in that case. Or is it just because the iPod is popular so they wanted to get a piece of that hot pod action?

    5. Re:Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 1
      I knew it! It's a conspiracy, I tell you!

      Stupid tin-foil hats turned out to be worthless after all.

      --
      John
    6. Re:Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That part I don't really have a problem with. "iPod(TM)" has become a generic term for virtually any portable digital music player (excepting discmans and the like.) iPods are now the kleenex of the player world. At least it's a "correct" usage: you can download and play a podcast on an iPod.

      But no matter how hard you try, you can't "broadcast" to an iPod. You can only put the media out there and hope your audience comes and gets it.

      --
      John
    7. Re:Pet peeve by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Can I bitch to? Im sick of XML worship. XML is a useful container that holds information, and saves people from having to write a parser themselves. It's not some panacea, and its not some thing that enables all of these technologies.

      Nobody worships other data formats.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    8. Re:Pet peeve by richieb · · Score: 1
      Can I bitch to? Im sick of XML worship.

      I agree. I've come to realize that XML causes more problems than it solves. Everytime I see XML with element I cringe.

      XML makes it easy to define languages, and so every idiot goes ahead and defines one...

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    9. Re:Pet peeve by richieb · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to say "" element.....

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    10. Re:Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 5, Funny
      Please, feel free to loathe XML. Can you imagine the design sessions for it?

      Boss: "OK, everyone, listen up. Memory sales are dead flat. We've got to figure out a way to really push the envelope and get people to buy more of our RAM chips. Come up with ideas, folks!"

      Johnson: "What if we had everyone transmit data in a bloated format, and spin it so people think it's doing something magical?"

      Adams: "Nobody would buy that. They're just computers, they can deal with any formats we can think up, they just have to have a program that parses them."

      Johnson: "But we can tell people that 'other' computers can read this. Most people are used to applications that don't communicate, so they'll see this as their savior!"

      Smith: "Never work. Bandwidth isn't there."

      Johnson: "That's the beauty of this scheme! We'll have them put their data in this giant format, and then run even bigger programs to compress it before transmission and another to decompress it!!"

      Boss: "Brilliant! Bonuses all around!!"

      --
      John
    11. Re:Pet peeve by geekSession · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree with that I'm afraid. I've had several people ask me what the difference is between and iPod and an mp3 player. Maybe it's just the people I know but they seem to see adverts for mp3 players and adverts for iPods and see them as completely seperate entities.

      --
      Note to self: Don't comment on /. unless you are absolutely sure of what you are saying.
    12. Re:Pet peeve by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Oh, I hear ya!

      XML is, how can I put this? "Cute."

      That's it, "cute": it's a nice way of describing structured data that a human can easily understand. As for portability, well, yeah, but it stands to reason that a "source code" representation of data and structure would be portable, so that isn't any great brilliance. It isn't like we didn't have machine-agnostic structured interchange formats already: witness XDR: my littne endian machine clients have been talking to big-endian machine servers for years. And, XDR to XML translaters wouldn't have been difficult to write. Hech, XDR to C/C++ data structures translators wouldn't have been difficult to write. In fact, that's exactly what IDL compilers did

      XML is nothing more than a generalization of HTML, which itself is a watered down SGML. But, while a structured textual representation of textual data makes sense, it isn't clear that a structured textual representation of non-text makes sense -- it's a useful way for people to communicate the structure of data, but machines? Geez, that's just a bunch of parser-writers mentally masturbating.

      But, as HTML came into vogue, people became comfortable with textual markup, and structure (not as if SGML hasn't been around already - TBL just made it "accessible"). Combine that with textual represenation of non-textual data, and you have a recipe for XML.

      Bottom line: XML is a machine-agnostic structured data interchange format designed by those who have just sufficient knowledge about computers to be dangerous.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    13. Re:Pet peeve by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Yes! These so-called "analogies" frighten and confuse me. All words should be restricted to their narrow, original, literal meanings. I demand we return to speaking Proto-Indo-European so that we can be sure all these hideous neologisms are banished forever.

    14. Re:Pet peeve by __aaercy5451 · · Score: 1

      In the sense of BROADCASTING, numnuts!

    15. Re:Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 1
      Were you unable to read the post to which you replied? Do you not understand what a broadcast is?

      Here, I'll paste you the top few definitions from google:

      # A signal transmitted to all user terminals in a service area, or the process.
      keskus.hut.fi/opetus/s38118/s98/htyo/54/abbrev.sht ml

      # Transmission to a number of receiving locations simultaneously.
      www.isg-telecom.com/telco_glossary.htm

      # Transferring learning content to many learners simultaneously, as in a satellite broadcast or an IP multicast. In an IP multicast, numerous learners can participate in a learning event that is broadcast over the network using the Internet Protocol from a single source.
      https://fortress.wa.gov/dop/elearn/help/general-gl ossary.aspx

      # Refers to signals intended for delivery on television, as well as network delivery to a wide audience.
      www.brynmawr.edu/filmstudies/writing/glossary.html

      # The sending of messages or video to many or all points simultaneously.
      www.fortfrancesbroadband.ca/terms.htm

      Notice how almost all of them refer to transmitting, and especially simultaneously.

      A "podcast" is just an .MP3 put on a server. No broadcasting takes place. It is not "delivered". It's up to the audience to decide when to go and fetch the data. It is not synchronized, so it is not "simultaneous" either. Even the RSS "feed" (another misnomer) isn't broadcast. It's a blob of XML that clients go fetch every so often. When the client detects a change in the blob it may then signal a different client process to read the .MP3 data. There is no broadcasting of a podcast -- it's an ignorant marketing word that appeals to ignorant consumers.

      Finally, if you're going to insult someone, check your spelling, numbnuts.

      --
      John
    16. Re:Pet peeve by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1
      Most people are used to applications that don't communicate, so they'll see this as their savior!"

      Now youre getting it.

      Of course XML isnt a magical potion. It does however, allow those applications that people arent used to communicating together, to communicate. And yes, it uses compression that takes up memory. You obviously have some problem with that philosophy. After all, who needs more than 640K of RAM anyway?

      Face it, one day you will not have a Hard Disk drive whirring around in your cute little PC. It will ALL be RAM. Or more exactly, memory modules using 'chips', instead of platters. Think of it as a big USB drive. Its coming, and not too far down the road. And personally I cant wait!

      Think of it, remember when hard drives barely existed, or were in the form of actually using cassette tapes? You didnt need massive data storage. Then applications grew and it became more efficient to have a place to keep them instead of loading 5 disks every time you wanted to run it. So now we had to have a big clunky box around that we came to expect as being there every time the PC was on, then it even REQUIRED it to be there. Now we are moving back, as momory prices fall and densities continue to rise, it will be trivial to have your "Hard Drive" in the form of chips, instead of giant inefficient spinning disks. And the PC will have made another 'transition'.

      Like I said, I cant wait.

    17. Re:Pet peeve by giberti · · Score: 1

      It's a tissue vs. Kleenex, Zerox vs. photo copy ... (the list goes on) debate on house hold words, they catch on and take a long time to go away.

      --

      AF-Design, web development.
    18. Re:Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 1
      Of course XML isnt a magical potion. It does however, allow those applications that people arent used to communicating together, to communicate. And yes, it uses compression that takes up memory. You obviously have some problem with that philosophy. After all, who needs more than 640K of RAM anyway?

      No, XML can't do anything by itself. It doesn't allow apps to communicate any more or less than any other communications standard. You're still bound to schemas just as tightly as an ancient app was bound to the columns on the punch cards. Oh, boy, Visual Studio can get the schema via WSDL. While that is a great time-saver for VB.NET developers, it does so at the run-time expense of every single client -- forever.

      Look, I already have Microsoft breathing down my director's neck saying "XML will unite your applications! .NET is all about the XML! Web Services! WSDL! Indigo! Team Studio 2005!" I also have tens of thousands of ancient client machines that are still stuck at 128MB with 233MHz processors and 1GB hard drives. I'm hoping we get half of them to at least 1GB RAM and 2.4GHz by 2007-2008, but that will depend on our corporate board handing over a really large sack o'money.

      Like I said, I cant wait.

      If you're going to be a "Rah, Rah, X-M-L! Rah-rah!" cheerleader, bring me the sack o'money so I don't have to wait, either. Upgrade my machines. Then you'll get some rah-rah out of me.

      Maybe a parable will put it in perspective: at our vendor's request, we actually implemented their XML-based data layer on our current 128MB boxes for something other than a simple web request. Talk about a pointless exercise -- we knew from their design overview that it would suck, but we never imagined just how badly it could suck. The performance figures were concrete proof; the rah-rah project manager was sufficiently embarassed, and they ensured that my director won't even look at XML until at least the next decade. 128MB may be more than 640KB, but it's not enough for XML either, trust me.

      --
      John
    19. Re:Pet peeve by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1

      Im not rah-rah-ing XML. Far from it. I am rah-rah-ing the fact that technology keeps driving forward at a rate similar to a bulldozer. While not always lightning fast, its effects are easily noticed over time.

      Its not the fault of XML that your boss is a tightwad, and uninformed. Its not the fault of XML that you are using outdated equipment. Its sounds more like you dont have any authority to say what does or does not happen. Its like m e walking down a city street and being forced to give money to the bums because the person walking with me tells me to. Not a situation I would be glad to be in....

      Perhaps its time to move out of the education/non-profit sector and find a sector that can supply the hardware you need to run the applications of today. I made a similar move not all that long ago, having worked for a large non-profit company in Chicago. When I switched over to the tech side of a sector of the economy that is awash with money, things changed drastically. I wasnt hitting road blocks constantly, and getting frustrated with every little addition. Need a new web service app? cool, Ill have it running in a few days on one of the spare dual-proc servers. What Im trying to tell you, is that you need to move out of where you are if you feel that you are not being as effective as you could be. Otherwise, it is you holding yourself back, not your boss, not your vendors, not your hardware, and certainly not XML. You have to at some point accept responsibility and stop trying to point out the failures of the rest of the world.

      The concept of XML is something I do appreciate. I like the fact that communication has the ability to done between applications. I like the 'agnostic' way that data can be transferred without being 'converted' every time it passes between platforms or applications.

      Perhaps if you were not running a windows operating system on those 128MB PC's you wouldnt be having such an issue. You need to know where your supply weaknesses are, and direct your attention at those points. When you fail to correctly identify those weaknesses you may end up criticizing the wrong thing, for the wrong reasons. Is XML perfect? no. But certainly not for any of the reasons you have put forward so far.

      I wouldnt suddenly be upset with gas prices if I went out and bought a H2 hummer. It would be better to not buy the hummer because I know that gas prices are so high. To sit around trying to discredit the gas prices constantly makes you seem to have a very narrow vision of the big picture.

    20. Re:Pet peeve by plover · · Score: 1
      It's not a case of "boss tightwad" or being "uninformed", it's a case of maximizing investment. We have a schedule to replace machines, and we need them to have a ten-year lifespan, regardless of what cool technology comes out. This upcoming replacement cycle will cost well over a hundred million dollars. We are a gigantic for-profit corporation, we make money and lots of it, but we can't afford to buy new gear just because Microsoft came out with .NET or because XML hit the scene.

      Like anyone else, we buy what we can afford when the time comes, and then we have to live with that decision for some time. Our Microsoft reps don't seem to understand it, because they've moved beyond our hardware realm about five years ago and think we should buy new machines every three years just like they buy their desktops.

      Something I've noticed that a disturbing number of people (including a large chunk of our internal technology group) fail to understand is that we are not a technology company. We are in a completely different business. We *need* technology to perform our tasks, but we are not "technology leaders", we're not in the information systems business, we're not a software house. We have some people who write software to solve our problems, but our problems are not software problems, they're business problems. This misconception leads to people thinking we should be on the cutting edge of everything. But what we require most is a stable environment so our employees can do the real task of servicing our customers.

      --
      John
    21. Re:Pet peeve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bottom line: XML is a machine-agnostic structured data interchange format designed by those who have just sufficient knowledge about computers to be dangerous.

      According to me, history shows that is is those who have computer knowledge who are dangerous.

      Is is also well known that programmers like to complicate their realizations in order to restrict access to them to computer literate people only.

      Finally, has you said it XML is a
      useful way for people to communicate the structure of data, but machines ?
      What's wrong with that aren't information systems conceived for humans ? Why programmers do not want to concentrate only on the machine aspect and write good parsers? Why do they want to control everything? When it comes to data structuration, I think programmers are not the only people concerned, linguistic experts, documentalists, information architects, etc, are also concerned if we want a real information society, not just a field for programmers to show off their talents.

    22. Re:Pet peeve by renehollan · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with that aren't information systems conceived for humans ?

      Because it isn't only humans that are expected to manage and transform the information, and in fact, humans rarely play a part in the process.

      Computers deal far more efficiently with data in a format that their fundemental instruction sets are designed to work with. This generally means optimization in the interest of time and space (these can be at odds with eachother, but there are some optimizations for one that are not detremental to the other).

      For a simple example, consider the way that numbers are respresented: a two's complement base-2 representation of integers and the mantissa and exponent of floating point numbers, with varients regarding size of integers and digits of precision of floating point numbers. Such representations are very unfriendly for humans, and perfectly adapted to electronic manipulation. So, what does one do? One translates at the human/machine and machine/human interfaces.

      This does not happen with XML: XML is used for an inter-machine structured data representation despite being much better suited for a human/machine or machine/human translation of structured data. It might make sense to have stuff traditionally found in /etc config files in XML, for example, because humans have to deal with it, as well as machines. But, historically such data had a fixed, simple structure implied by the name of the file.

      But, it is possible to have an inter-machine structured data exchange format that is much easier to deal with by machines, than XML. XDR offered this to allow RPC between machines using different numberic representatons, for example. XML remains too "high-level" to allow for efficient manipulation. If you think that XML is great then you probably think that non-tokenizing BASIC interpreters are great tool. What they are (in both cases) is s l o w.

      The slowness of XML parsing is well-known, and often a bottleneck in machine to machine communications: every machine parsing and re-parsing XML. One can argue that we have more processor speed, memory, and bandwitdh these days, and that is true, but you will still reach a performance-bottleneck as you scale up. And more scalability is better than less.

      Just wait, you will soon see an "Accelerated XML" or "Compiled XML" standard on the horizon, and XDR will be reborn.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  7. Podcasting and Licensing of Music by Aens · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The problem with podcasting is music licensing: if you put music on a recording and distribute it, you're liable for ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC royalties. And this is reasonable. The composers wrote the songs, joined the association, and deserve to be paid for their work.

    Who has the infrastructure to account and pay for this sort of stuff? Professional broadcasters, mostly.

    This assumes the music was written by an association composer. Perhaps you have some unsigned band that has granted you permission to use their material. You're clean.

    Beyond music, there's spoken word. Performances have value, but many of the podcasts I've heard were more akin to written blogs than produced audio programming.

    What Apple could do here, if they're so inclined, is to swing a podcast deal with their labels. Music purchased from the iTunes store would be licensed for personal use as it is now and non-commercial podcasting. If iTunes could be retooled to record voice-overs -- and it sounds if that may be coming -- you could build a podcast within iTunes and distribute it via Apple's music store. The podcasts would be playable through iTunes.

    Apple's motivation in this is twofold: it would encourage podcasters to use Apple's platform and purchase their library through the Apple Store, and the podcast songs would be clickable. Listeners could buy whatever they like as they hear it.

    It's a proprietary solution, but would finesse the licensing issue and make music podcasting more accessable.

    --
    Make me your friend; my fans get +1 comment scores.
  8. Before anyone has to say it... by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

    Yes I see that there is a typo in my "typo". It was a legitimate misteak.

    1. Re:Before anyone has to say it... by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Never mind the typos, as long as you get a good steak!

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  9. Podcasting A Misnomer by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first heard about podcasting and podcasts, I really didn't have a clue what it meant. The name seems to make an inextricable link between the iPod and this content, which simply isn't the case. Admittedly the iPod is the leading portable mp3 players, and mp3 players are the major driver of this content.

    But still. My parents here about podcasts. It's a buzzword. They don't care. I tell them they can download a radio show and listen to it on the computer; their ears pick up. They hated streaming shows almost as much as I did, but when they found out you could slurp the whole show in one go and listen to it at your leisure, they were into the technology almost as fast as they got into Google Earth.

    Maybe it was the same with email way back when. I remember people asking me; "Email. What's that?". I had to explain to them that it stood for electronic mail and that you could send and recieve mail to and from other peoples "electronic postboxes". (No I'm not Korean). THEN they got it. Email was just a buzzword until then. But now the word email is ubiquitous, so perhaps the same will be true of podcasting.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Podcasting A Misnomer by PipeIsArt · · Score: 1

      Oh, geez, I hope it does not become ubiquitous. Podcasting? Come on, we can be more creative than that.

      --
      I find that although many people are liberal in beliefs, they are conservative in actions.
  10. Is Sony listening? by spejsklark · · Score: 1

    Glad to see my own [soon to be patented] solution regarding podcasting of the latest rootkit updates isn't in the book.

    1. Re:Is Sony listening? by Ashley+Bowers · · Score: 0

      Thats interesting did not know you could patent something already being done!!

  11. XML? Meh by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    XML? Who uses it alone anymore? Its time for AJAX (spelled a j a x ), baby!

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  12. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by east+coast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back then, the content was better too because not every 12 year old had one.

    Not to feed a troll but this is what happens as a communications medium becomes more popular; you start to see a lot of drive behind stuff that is normally considered "the lowest common denominator" by the early bird crowd.

    Just look at Napster, when it was a "geek thing" it was a quiet community with some great content and you could download a file without wondering if you were getting the right thing or if it was corrupt, etc etc... After Metallica started to scream about it everyone got on the band wagon and we had idiots who claimed that Lenny Kravit's version of American Woman was done by Jimi Hendrix and still, better yet, was completely mislabled content.

    Now with e-mule I try to get a preview of my downloads ASAP to ensure that my Lectures on Physics by Feynman aren't actually some kind of fisting video. Like that's a real riot... geez...

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  13. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll bite...

    Live-to-tape had been available to download for years, much as news has been available on websites for years.

    RSS meant that you could aggregate news in one place without needing to browse through 20 different sites to see anything new. Likewise, podcasts mean you can get new episodes of content without needing to check manually and download.

    As it happens, I quite like the fact that I pick up my iPod in the morning and some news is 'just there' for me to listen to. If you can tell me why manually checking for, downloading and copying a broadcast to your device is preferable to just letting an application automatically aggregate (Ooh, alliteration) 3 or 4 different feeds then I'm all ears.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  14. The best podcasting "hack" I've found... by thzinc · · Score: 5, Informative

    IMO, the best podcasting "hack" that I have found is using del.icio.us to find, create, and maintain simple podcasts. Just use the tag "system:filetype:mp3" to find only MP3s. (Hint, it also works for other filetypes.)

    All recent MP3s: http://del.icio.us/rss/tag/system:filetype:mp3

    All popular MP3s: http://del.icio.us/rss/popular/system:filetype:mp3

    An example of my own podcast: http://del.icio.us/rss/thzinc/voicemail+outgoing+s ystem:filetype:mp3

    And an example of a video podcast ;) : http://del.icio.us/rss/thzinc/video+tv+pbs+system: filetype:mov

    Just something I've found useful.

    Daniel James

    1. Re:The best podcasting "hack" I've found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a very interesting hack. Thanks for sharing! Took me just a couple of minutes to find this little gem:

      http://www.myihigh.org/stuff/calcrap.mp3
       
      It's a rap about calculus. I'd say something witty here if I could, but just listen to it.

    2. Re:The best podcasting "hack" I've found... by PokerAndroid · · Score: 1

      Thanks, very cool. Watching the video now.

  15. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
    some kind of fisting video
    That's hot. Is it better than streaming video?
    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  16. podcasting means syndication by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tell them they can download a radio show and listen to it on the computer; their ears pick up.

    Try again: tell them that a computer program can download a radio show and all subsequent shows automatically on their behalf.

    The difference between a podcast and "a show you can download" is that podcasting means syndication.

    I don't care what we call podcasting, but calling it "a radio show you can download" seriously undervalues the magic of rss and feed aggregators.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  17. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

    You could do it before, and I personally did it before. Crontab + small bash script = automated downloads of Hacker Mind ready for me to listen to at my convenience. Could even script it onto an mp3 player, had one existed yet.

    "Podcasting" is not a new concept, its just a bad term (nothing to do with ipods, nothing to do with broadcasting) for something the rest of us have done for years. Sure, a little bit of standards involved is nice, but as long as you had a url for the stream and a timeslot, you didn't really need anything else.

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  18. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

    Thing is, it's still just a scheduled task, nothing wonderous or fantastical in any way really. Delikver it to the iPod WITHOUT needing to plug it in to anything and you might have something slightly more novel there.

  19. substance over style by ThomasMis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's still nice about podcasting, is that it's an audio/visual medium that doesn't have to dilute itself. Established media produces content aimed at the widest possible audience, and therefore ends up not being appealing to anyone at all. Whereas, I can create a podcast targeted toward the hardcore gamers, and it can find a loyal audience.

    Furthermore, by using RSS as the delivery platform, basement hacks like me can go up against established media. For example, my friends and I do a gaming podcast that is beating out established entities like PC Gamer magazine's podcast (based on subscriber numbers from yahoo and odeo).

    But numbers aside, it's fun. We don't make money off of it, nor do we think we ever will... but we do it for the love. How can established media beat people producing content out of love?!

    --
    Check out my podcast: DreamStation.cc Video Game Show
    1. Re:substance over style by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      How can established media beat people producing content out of love?

      Usually with a large stick
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  20. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by east+coast · · Score: 1

    That's hot. Is it better than streaming video?

    Heh. I honestly cant tell you but I can tell you that it wasn't suppose to be "Feynman's lectures on fisting". Infact he was not even in the video... what's up with that?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  21. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Most fisting videos also have streaming content....or so I have heard.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Amazon by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm going to post the Amazon.com Link to Podcasting Hacks just because the Barnes and Nobles link only has 1 (one) review.

    Its also interesting to compare/contrast the alternative books suggested by each site.
    Amazon:
    Podcasting: Do It Yourself Guide
    Podcast Solutions: The Complete Guide to Podcasting
    Secrets of Podcasting : Audio Blogging for the Masses
    Syndicating Web Sites with RSS Feeds For Dummies®
    Podcasting For Dummies®
    Barnes and Nobles:
    The Art of Intrusion: The Real Stories Behind the Exploits of Hackers, Intruders & Deceivers
      Exploiting Software: How to Break Code
      Hacking: The Art of Exploitation
      Wi-Foo
      Learning the Bash Shell
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  23. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by yermama · · Score: 1

    I too am mesmerized by this phenomena. An auto-refreshing web page of HYPERLINKS gives the exact same results !?!?!? Yes, the sources would have to maintain some sort of valid link structure, but the same issue exists for RSS.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. sure it is by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It is a lot easier to do this then any previous methods of recording live broadcasts.

    Therefore, it will be used be a substantially larger audience, which mean more peiople will be able to get information outside mainstream media.

    You seem to think this is about putting information on a device, it is not.

    It is about any body with a computer being able to get an audience, to be able to broadcast any information they like without controls. It is about the people who create broadcasts.

    Of course, the likes of you wouldn't consider the printing press new or usefull because scribes have been around, and all it is is a fancy scribe.
    You also wouldn't have consider writing new and fantastic because you could just listen to the local sage.

    In short, you have a small mind.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:sure it is by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      You miss the point entirely. It has nothing to do with recording, its about distribution.

      Furthermore before the FCC decided to get rid of Class D licenses, there were easy ways to be a broadcaster on the public airwaves(in the US at least).

      It is a lot easier to do this then any previous methods of recording live broadcasts

      You seem to think this is about putting information on a device

      You mean "recording"? That's what you just said it was about.

      It is about any body with a computer

      And an internet connection.

      being able to get an audience, to be able to broadcast any information they like without controls.

      Uh, the internet's been around for a while now. And BBS's before the mainstream net. How about those WITHOUT a computer? Public access TV predates the internet.

      It is about the people who create broadcasts.

      How? Anyone with a will to publish in any medium will find a means. It isn't about people, its about a new jargon for "tape recording". Seriously, explain to me the difference between this and a radio tape recorder unit on a timer? A method I have used for 25 years.

      In short, you have a small mind.

      All the effort you put into a post and destroy your whole argument with a personal attack, well done.

  26. New services allow for turnkey Podcasting by ikewillis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Services like ClickCaster allow you to record Podcasts directly from the Web via a Java applet or upload your own MP3 files directly to their site. The RSS feed is then constructed automatically from metadata you enter along with the recording; sort of like a Blogger or LiveJournal for Podcasting.

  27. GPL Text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Nobody worships other data formats."

    All hail the mighty GPL.

  28. ROTFL! MOD PARENT UP +Funny!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If laughing help you live long, I'm gonna live to 100 now!

  29. Actually... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    There have also been "podcasts" LONG before there were potcasts.
    I at least remember downloading mp3 files from websites via my old 56k in the 90s... To bad back then we didnt have a l33t word for it.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  30. "Power of XML"?! by g0at · · Score: 1

    The power of XML is yet to be fully recognized

    Uh... okay. The power of wood has yet to be recognized! The power of stairs! The power of math! Oh my god! All of these inanimate things which are simple building blocks have all this POWER!! Oooauuugh....

    -b

  31. Here's Your Sign by Ranger · · Score: 0, Redundant

    XML is subtly and quietly being used to link digital documents together, and more significantly, databases, much like the Internet itself linked individual computers into a global network.

    No shit. Did the submitter just discover XML?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  32. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by StupidHelpDeskGuy · · Score: 1

    You could of course just pay for your Feynman lectures, rather than just stealing them.

    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/result s.asp?WRD=feynman&userid=0I26GdbCjr&cds2Pid=9481

  33. Speach Rec + Search = Searchable PodCasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something my company put together recently ...

    PodZinger

  34. Talk about typoes by giberti · · Score: 1

    Or Xerox as the case may be!

    --

    AF-Design, web development.
  35. Podcasting Word Documents?!? by lieumorrison · · Score: 1

    Well, you can 'podcast' PDF files via iTunes... I don't see a Word document being podcasted all that far out.

    --
    | Information is the currency |
  36. GrammarNazi Strikes Again! by Judebert · · Score: 1

    Actually, when the words begin with vowels, it's assonance, not alliteration.

    I apologize for the content of this post. It was a knee-jerk reaction.

    --

    For geek dads: Contraction Timer

  37. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by east+coast · · Score: 1

    You could of course just pay for your Feynman lectures, rather than just stealing them.

    Well, this is where you've made a horrible assumption, actually, a couple of them.

    First, not all of Feynman's material is commercially available. So there is a number of "bootleg" files the if you really want them you need to resort to "stealing" them.

    Secondly, I speak as living proof to the fact that often my P2P sampling has indeed lead to sales. I have bought a number of things after a "sample". I know there are plenty that don't but that's not me.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  38. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by StupidHelpDeskGuy · · Score: 1

    I agree with the point about some of his material not being available. However, the sampling argument is quite specious. You can sample most, if not all, of the commercially available work. Plus, if you know enough to listen to Feynman, you know enough to know the difference between stealing and not stealing.

  39. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by east+coast · · Score: 1

    You can sample most, if not all, of the commercially available work. Plus, if you know enough to listen to Feynman, you know enough to know the difference between stealing and not stealing.

    Sorry to be a bit late on this...

    Sampling 30 seconds of a lecture is not like sampling 30 seconds of a pop song. All too often you get into a situation where a lecture is only available on a large (and pricey) box set. Taking a 30 minutes lecture from a collection that holds 20 hours of content is pretty much sampling at that point. It's not like downloading the first side of Dark Side of the Moon and calling it a sample, that'd be more like hearing half of "Time" and calling it a sample.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  40. Re:Nothing new under the sun. by StupidHelpDeskGuy · · Score: 1

    Agreed. You should check out audible.com. I'm considering it for myself as well as for gift giving this holiday season.