Slashdot Mirror


Music Industry 'trying to hijack EU data laws'

sebFlyte writes "The recording industry is trying to hijack the EU's data retention directive, which is being brought in to fight terrorism, to try and get their copyright battles fought for them. As previously reported, the EU may be making copyright infringement a criminal offence, and the Creative Media Business Alliance is lobbying hard to stop the European laws on data retention being restricted to cover terrorism and organized crime (as is currently proposed). In essence, they want to be able to get police to search through newly extended records from ISPs to look for evidence of illegal filesharing. In the words of the executive director of the Open Rights group, 'the music industry's attempt to hijack this legislation is a travesty and a gross affront to civil liberties and human rights.'"

9 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Here is the original article by warmcat · · Score: 5, Informative

    For some reason neither zdnet nor the submitter give a link to the site and article they are talking about:

    an openrights.org blog entry.

    The page has a cool link to WriteToThem where UK readers at least can quickly find out who their MEP is and how to contact them.

  2. Re:I guess it's important to talk about it by rel4x · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm in the same boat as you in that I benefit from this kind of legislation.
    However, it does not sound reasonable.
    It sounds profitable.
    There is a difference.

    --

    Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
  3. This illustrates for Canadians too... by saskboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    For Canadians who aren't sure if the new Wiretap legislation or Copyright Act amendment Bill C-60 are good bills, we'll end up with the same push from the CRIA to obtain ISP logs that are supposed to be only available to the police in criminal investigations where they've obtained a warrant.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  4. Boycott by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 5, Informative
  5. "Have you no sense of decency, sir?" by Quirk · · Score: 4, Informative
    McCarthyism

    "...the Army's attorney general, Joseph Welch, rebuked McCarthy: "Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"

    "McCarthyism took place during a period of intense suspicion in the United States primarily from 1950 to 1954, when the U.S. government was actively countering American Communist Party subversion, its leadership, and others suspected of being Communists or Communist sympathizers. During this period people from all walks of life became the subject of aggressive "witch-hunts," often based on inconclusive or questionable evidence. It grew out of the Second Red Scare that began in the late 1940s and is named after the U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, a Republican of Wisconsin."

    It's ironic that, especially Hollywood, and, the recording industry, so much a target of Joe McCarthy should now be at the forefront of an hysterical witchhunt intent on making criminals of all and sundry.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  6. E-mail the parliament! by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you disagree with this, e-mail the EU representatives (MEPs). Complaining at slashdot won't help. Here's a list of all the email addresses from http://www.europarl.eu.int/ .

    List of emails

    I have already e-mailed and called my countries. You should do the same.

  7. UK Home Secretary already has unlimited access by UpnAtom · · Score: 5, Informative

    The totalitarian UK Government already has unlimited access to ISP records, courtesy of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.
    RIPA also can force ISPs to install mass surveillance equipment.

    I mentioned some of the Govt's other totalitarian laws earlier today.

  8. Re:I guess it's important to talk about it by lee7guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll make this simple for you:

    Piracy is not stealing. Period.

    Piracy is copyright infringement. Period.

    Learn this simple fact, and you won't have to look like a fool in public.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
  9. Re:I guess it's important to talk about it by mcvos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Piracy is stealing if you sell illegal copies for money that would otherwise have gone to the record companies and artists.

    But I wouldn't call sharing music with friends "piracy".