Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Goes Wiki

StWaldo writes "Amazon.com has added a 'ProductWiki' to some of their item pages. Wikified items seem to be limited to certain categories, DVDs being one un-wikied realm. Adding Wikiness to the site is just the latest in new participatory activities Amazon has adopted, along with tags and customer discussions." From the article: "So Amazon's gradually allowing you, along with your Wish List, your purchases, your clickstream, and, if you sell anything on Amazon, how good your reputation is--to build up a pretty detailed database of what you like (or don't) and what's important to you. I don't know what Amazon will do with this--fortunately, it seems to have a pretty light touch with how it uses what it knows about you--or what it will allow us to do with all this data. But as it grows, it could become a pretty powerful profile."

22 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Ah, but ... by Grumpy+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Amazon spokesman added that the wiki policy required contributions to be strictly NPOV, except for positive comments.

  2. Patent? by strcmp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if they will patent Wikis as well.

    --
    "Yields falsehood when preceded by its own quotation" yields falsehood when preceded by its own quotation.
  3. not offtopic by jherber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the article is about amazon building up information about you and your preferences. this leads to "silos" that do not interoperate. can this be shared with ebay, or other sites so that you don't have to teach all media commerce sites what types of things you like? no. perhaps a community based repository for preferences makes more sense. watch dick hardt's message from oscon - it just makes sense.

    http://www.identity20.com/media/OSCON2005/

  4. What will they do with all of that data? by Graham1982 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somewhere, somehow, there is a hurricane of advertising just waiting to annoy the Hell out of you. They will be marketing things like Star Wars collectables and case mods among other geeky things that you bought or searched for on Amazon. You will not be able to run, you will not be able to hide, Jamster will want to give you the latest Chewbacca ringtone.

    1. Re:What will they do with all of that data? by NoneExpected · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was young, we made mistakes and thankfully most of them are buried in unwritten-history and with college buddies I don't see anymore.

      Nowadays everything you have written on-line or maybe every site you ever visited is recorded.

      Gods know how the Star Wars collectible will come back to haunt you, but I can imagine a scenario during a local election where your opponent shouts, "he collects dolls and plays with them in his bedroom!".

      Reminds of how Representative Claude Pepper of some southern state, lost an election when he opponent charged, "he practises nepotism with his niece in his office".

  5. Not the first time for Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not the first time Amazon has experimented with the wiki system. In 2003 they were working on a system called "Review Start". Users were allowed to submit their own review and make additions and edits to the product descriptions. The system was scrapped because Jeff Bezos thought it would hurt search indexing and ultimately Amazon sales. It will be interesting to see how the wiki model works for them.

  6. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by imroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How the fuck can this be called spyware? I would have thought that spyware is, by definition, software that spys on your behaviour. This is a wiki, a web page. It doesn't run on your machine, and users have to wilfully input the information. There's nothing secretive about this at all. If Amazon want to search your contributions for keywords or something, then fine. But then it's called data mining. Not spyware.

  7. Re:my amazon horror by mikeboone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not dispute the charges with your CC company? That'll get Amazon's attention in a hurry.

  8. Re:consumers: pathetic? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I keep an Amazon wish list. Given that I have a family, mortgage, loan payments, etc I often don't have the money to buy the things I want when I see them. I also have a poor memory for that sort of thing, so I keep the list so as to not forget what it was that I wanted.

    Of course, I rarely get round to actually buying anything on my list, but that's another matter.

    I also know someone who runs a forum-based website with a fair number of users who keeps an amazon wishlist. From time to time people will buy him stuff on it, as a way to say thanks for providing the site (which he does free of charge and in his own time).

  9. Re:Boo hoo by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly there *are* no 'local' stores any more - they're all part of big national chains.

    Secondly, they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges, have fewer items available, and don't get me started on customer support - those idiots wouldn't know support if it hit them on the head.

    I've had *far* better support from online retailers than I have ever had from 'local' stores.

  10. Re:Clickstream? by shokk · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should have seen the rejected names list:
        CashStream
        Shut Up and Give Us Your Earnings
        Christmas... Pony Up
        Amazon Love Linky Winky
        Obligatory Purchase
        Comsume, You Gluttons!
        Clown Anus Portal
        Ha! We Have One-Click Patented! You Don't!
        Real-Time Stock Link! Watch Stock Rise After Each Purchase

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  11. Re:Boo hoo by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly there *are* no 'local' stores any more - they're all part of big national chains.

    That's simply not true. I own quite a successful one, thank you.

    Secondly, they all charge 25%-50% more than online charges, have fewer items available, and don't get me started on customer support - those idiots wouldn't know support if it hit them on the head.

    25-50% more? I doubt that. They will be more expensive, sure, because they create good jobs, contribute to your economy, and give you a local place to get stuff. They're going to be more expensive. And, do you really NEED 100,000 different items to choose from? Are you buying 100,000 different items?

    But, keep repeating what you're saying and one day you'll be right... there will be no more local stores.

  12. Re:So is Amazon spyware ? by mizhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The difference is that Amazon gives you options. You can turn off most, if not all of the features of Amazon. Amazon is also upfront about the data it collects and even provides handy little links to help items explaining what the data collected is used for. Amazon, to my knowledge, has never installed software on my machine.

    Gator and Co use subterfuge and dishonest tactics to get programs installed on your computer. These programs are non-optional, disrupt other work that may be done on the computer, and are very difficult to completely remove.

    The comparison is non-sensical.

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
  13. Errors with Safari by Athyra · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been getting errors on Amazon pages as a result of the wiki (Javascript -- Null Value) on Safari with the last two MacOS systems. Amazon hasn't even responded to any of my messages about it, but I've got to say, even if an error is just harmless and can be bypassed by hitting "return," I'm not inclined to browse a site very often if I keep getting error pop-ups any more than if I'm getting ad pop-ups.

    Anyone know if other OS/browser combos are causing problems?

    1. Re:Errors with Safari by Heembo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Safari is just behind the curve in browser support, mixed with a recent surge in use. As a AJAX web developer, that sucks. Take Sarissa - the lightning fast XML Javascript parsing engine. Works "everywhere" except for Safari. Many sights I develop just "looks different" in Safari. The positive side is, my employer bought me my first mac (iMac mini) and it's more responsive than my $2000 uber-dell. As for development, I now "code Javascript" to Safari - and test everywhere else, since Safari is the lowest common denominator.

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
  14. Re:Boo hoo by radish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And, do you really NEED 100,000 different items to choose from? Are you buying 100,000 different items?
    No, I'm buying 1 item. But I need the correct one item. That's why a large selection is useful.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  15. Tag CDs which are copy controlled by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you've bought a CD through Amazon.com which is copy controlled, this is a good opportunity to tag it as such by leaving a note in the wiki. For example, I did this here - nothing inflammatory, just a friendly note for others who are thinking about buying the CD. This is information that I personally would like to know before deciding to purchase a CD, and I expect some others here feel the same.

    1. Re:Tag CDs which are copy controlled by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure you can add warnings all day to an title listed as the #55,186 best seller in music. I'm curious to see someone do that sort of thing with a popular title. My experience with Amazon's review features has been that I can rant about unpopular titles all day and those comments hang around, which reinforces the idea that they allow positive and negative reviews. Obviously biased comments, and ones that are negative about the topic of the book, seem to persist as well, also reinforcing that they're allowed. But try to put detailed warnings in about problems with a popular title, well those can silently go *poof*.

      Details: I've written many reviews about stock trading books. I've now tried to submit a review talking about exactly what's wrong with Michael Covel's "Trend Trading", ranked #1,415 in books, three times, each time changing the text around a bit. Every time it's dissapeared quickly afterward. Someone is editing out "+5 insightful" negative comments about this book, while leaving those unlikely to dissuade a buyer alone. It's all very curious.

  16. Limited to certain categories, not really by spazoid12 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Wikified items seem to be limited to certain categories, DVDs being one un-wikied realm."

    Not really. It's scheduled for all categories, but the launch of this feature may temporarily conflict with the launch of others, thus it is dormant in some categories until various experiments settle.

  17. Re:tomorrow by SunPin · · Score: 2, Informative
    BookBurro makes it simple and usually gets you a cheaper price as well.

    BookBurro is spyware.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  18. Re:Beware... by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You aren't paying attention: we are actually quite selective in our anti-patent rants. Mostly, it's software patents, patents on life forms and DNA sequences, and business method patents we rant against, that is, the kinds of patents that aren't granted in most of the world, the kinds of patents that didn't use to be granted in the US, and the kind of patents that hamper progress and innovation.

    I'm sorry for you that you don't understand what a threat these kinds of patents represent to a democracy, to property rights, and to a free market economy. Just be happy that other people worry about that sort of thing.

  19. Re:Clickstream? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

    You think that's bad?

    My company recently purchased another company for several billion dollars and one of the employees sent some sort of an email that was posted on our internal corporate page. It was referring to the culture of our company and how wonderful the language we used was.

    One of the comments they made was that "doubleclicking" an idea is brilliant! Where "doubleclicking" means that you want to look at an idea in more detail or discuss something further. As in "let's take a few minutes to doubleclick that interesting idea before we move on".

    What the HELL? Who the hell would use such an idiotic statement outside of . . . MAYBE marketing? If you talk like that, you might as well be one of those annoying tools that refers to not being able to find your screw driver as "I looked for a philips in my toolbox but it seems to be 404".

    GAAAAAAAH.