Microsoft's Answer to Google Base
douglips writes "Today Information Week is reporting on a forthcoming service from Microsoft intended to compete with Google Base. Instead of the freewheeling anything-goes nature of Google Base, the Microsoft project code named 'Fremont' will focus solely on classified ads. It will also allow restricting items to various audiences such as social networks or domain names. At this point, though, it appears to be a beta restricted to Microsofties." From the article: "In building Freemont, Wiseman and his five-person crew tried to make it both personal for people who only want to trade among family, friends and colleagues, while also providing the option of a public posting. Classifieds is a growing piece of the booming online advertising market that's expected to reach $13.8 billion by 2007, surpassing advertising spent on magazines, according to JupiterResearch. During that timeframe, spending on display ads and online classifieds together are expected to increase at a compound annual growth rate of 25 percent. "
From November 30... http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/30/054425 6&tid=109&tid=95
Before this post, I'd never heard of Google Base. For anyone else in that boat, here's the URL:
:)
http://base.google.com/base/default
And yes, it shows up very high on the list of hits if you Google for "Google Base"
When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
Well, Craigslist is JUST for the classifieds side of things, much like MS' version of this. Google base, however, can be used for a plethora of different DB work, beyond just simple froogle item ads or such.
Dare O, who is on a similar team within Microsoft, has blogged on some more details and, naturally, how much he likes 'Fremont' here... http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/PermaLink.aspx?g uid=85351eb5-509b-4c27-ad0e-1195fa802ca7
Who modded this guy up? As has been discussed 2^oo times before, the editors probably know full well what they're doing, but they do dupes for any combination of the following reasons:
a.) Bring in more advertising revenue, because a large portion of the slashdot crowd (myself included) read these dupes, having at least some idea that we're reading a dupe.
b.) People still click on the dupes, generating additional revenue for Slashdot from the advertisers that pay by-the-click.
c.) Some people have claimed before that they 'like the dupes', since they might have missed it the previous time around. (I guess they can't click on yesterdays news? Don't ask me to explain their logic...i dont understand it either.)
What amazes me the most about this whole dupe phenomenon is that there is not enough technology news that they already have their hands full. Another possiblility would be that they must have at least 1 (or preferably 2) articles related to google and/or microsoft everyday.
Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.