Slashdot Mirror


EA Sued Over Madden 06 Feature

von_blapp writes "EA is being sued over the Super Star feature that is included in Madden '06. Pernell Harris, owner of Virtual Jam is suing EA over a confidentiality violation. Harris claims when he met with EA in '03 he discussed a game called Heart Of A Champion, in this game players take high school athletes from the schools to the pros insuring their grades are kept up and even picking their parents for the optimum gene pool. This is the same feature as in the current game released by EA."

7 of 46 comments (clear)

  1. EA could just as well be a porn company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...because everyone who deals with them gets fucked eventually.

    Oh, and their games blow.

  2. Slight correction by Pluvius · · Score: 3, Informative

    The part where you take your athlete through college is simulated in Madden's sister game, NCAA Football 06. You export your college character to Madden 06 if you decide to enter the draft (usually at the end of your senior year, but you can cut a year off if you win a Heisman). Not that anyone here cares, but I thought I'd point it out.

    Rob

  3. In other news... by failrate · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Art is being sued by Life for imitation. Art is countersuing Life, also for imitation.

    --
    Voodoo Girl is the bomb!
  4. Re:They sort-of deserve it. by Meagermanx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This guy should lose. I'm tired of all these "OMG I was the one who thought they should use Mario in a tennis game!! I even posted it on a forum, so I have proof! Nintendo ripped my idea off, so I'm suing!" type of mentalities.
     
    Just because somebody has a cool idea and shares it doesn't mean if anybody implements that idea they can sue.
    Seriously, if you're not making it, and you're not fine with other people doing it, keep your damn ideas to yourself.
     
    And, honestly, how original of an idea is it to simulate a rising star's upbringing and career?

  5. Asinine by EnglishTim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ideas for games are cheap. Everybody's got an idea for a game. Everybody's got hundreds of ideas for games. It's the implementation that counts, and getting that right is damn hard work.

    I'm certainly not EA's biggest fan (especially as I work for a competitor!), but I find it difficult to believe that this case has any merit.

  6. Re:They sort-of deserve it. by HunterZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just because somebody has a cool idea and shares it doesn't mean if anybody implements that idea they can sue.

    He can (and should) file suit if EA signed documents saying that they wouldn't use this idea without licensing it from him first. The article alludes to a confidentiality agreement/contract but isn't specific, so there's no way to know what the deal is that they had.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  7. Dime a dozen... by Skreems · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know two people from college who had the exact same idea (seperately of each other) a couple years ago. I'm sure tens of thousands of people have had the same idea across the country. Did any of them do it? No. EA did. I'm all for "fuck corporations" as much as the next guy, but this is just ridiculous. Ideas are worthless until you actually implement them. I have some ideas that I'm convinced would make fantastic games, but I'm not in a position to make it happen right now. If someone beats me to the punch, I might be a little pissed that I didn't get to do it first, but it's stupid to sue over it.

    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie