NYT Opinion Piece on DRM And P2P
bsartist writes "The NYT is running an opinion piece written by a working musician who has a pretty healthy dislike of copy protection and DRM. From the article: 'As for musicians, we are left to wonder how many more people could be listening to our music if it weren't such a hassle, and how many more iPods might have our albums on them if our labels hadn't sabotaged our releases with cumbersome software.'"
I can almost hear the speeches about "...when the musicians control the means of production"...
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
I can't help but wonder, how many more people would have RTFA had it not been encumbered by an account system.
Is your contention that it's not possible to both have integrity and work in the professional music industry?
Yes. Unless it's gangsta integrity we're talking about. Then when u rappin' in da hood like dat mutha Fiddy Cent u gotz da big momma integrityz yo! Wurrrrrrrrrrdddd homie.
Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
It's OK labels. Don't cry now. There there. Yes, stop sniffling. It's OK. I know your customers and your vendors hate you, but it's OK. The politicians, lobbyists, and, well, you still love you.
Stop-Prism.org: Opt Out of Surveillance