Slashdot Mirror


Digital Music Stock Market?

tommertron writes "Adam L. Penenberg has a column on Slate about about the pricing of digital music, specifically, iTunes' 99-cent-a-song model. Basically, he suggests that song prices be determined by market forces, just like stock and commodities markets. The more a song gets downloaded, the more it would cost. Song by big-name bands would cost more, and lesser-known acts would cost less (with a minimum of 25 cents.)" From the article: "Steve Jobs, who has been willing to take a few pennies per download so long as he sells bushels of iPods, calls tiered pricing 'greedy.' That view is shared by millions of consumers who believe the record companies have been gouging them for years. From the buyer's perspective, however, Apple's 99-cents-for-everything model isn't perfect. Isn't 99 cents too much to pay for music that appeals to just a few people?"

1 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. but digital files aren't a limited commodity by mattkime · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Even though more downloads seems to indicate more value and therefore justifying higher cost - these are digital files!

    There is no scarcity!

    The file has the same value to me no matter how many people download the file.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.