Slashdot Mirror


First Cell Phone for Dogs

revelCyllufyalP writes "A company called PetsMobility has come out with PetCell, the first cell phone for dogs. The phone will allow users to call their dogs in case the dog gets away and also includes a GPS tracking device if the dog doesn't respond to the call. In addition, the PetCell will feature GeoFence, which will alert owners whenever their dogs wander outside a prescribed area. Will the PetCell actually prove useful to dog owners or is it just another cheap gimmick?"

20 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. I don't think it'll be cheap by seifried · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a feeling this will cost a pretty penny, of course that won't stop most people that are insecure enough that they would feel they need this to ensure their dog doesn't run away (crazy idea, why not look after your dog responsibly?).

    That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

    1. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why I'm a cat person. Kitty goes out, Kitty comes back in. She ain't dumb, she knows where her food dish is.

      Funnily, I've seen FAR more "lost cat" posters than "lost dog" posters.

    2. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or people don't grasp that a dog is a slave to man, while a cat is only slave to himself and doesn't give jack shit about his so called owner unless it's feeding time or he wants to play. Cats are t3h w1n.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by Liam+Slider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More along the lines of "temple attendant." They never have gotten over the whole "worshipped like gods" treatment with the ancient Egyptians.

    4. Re:I don't think it'll be cheap by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I know most people seem to believe that geeks are smarter than Taco Bell employees because they do what they please as opposed to a Taco Bell employee who seems to follow orders almost without hesitation, but I think the true reason is quite the opposite: Geeks are not as smart as Taco Bell employees. How's that? Well, Taco Bell employees respond to humans in an almost human way. They react the way you'd expect a person (sometimes a child) would. They obey your orders as though they felt that you're part of their pack. They seem to identify with you and they understand you. To me, a geek seems like it does as it pleases because it doesn't relate or understand humans as well. I'm not saying geeks can't empathize and show some kind of appreciation with humans to some extent, but rarely at the same level as Taco Bell employees.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. Just in time for Christmas... by boog3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    another worthless widget to consume!

    Please, go fulfill the American Dream (TM) and buy one today!

    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
  3. Sure... by Nichotin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fine for those serious pet owners who would die if their pet ran away, but it will be a total mess if people just purchase these things and let their dogs run loose just because they can track them.

  4. First cell phone for dogs by pulaski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I could be wrong but $350 to $400 doesn't sound too much like a cheap gimmick.

    --
    Quid, me anxius sum?
  5. For Dogs? by ignoramus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A thinly disguised means of putting a GPS leash on your kids... My guess is the pet angle just makes it look more friendly/gets more press, whereas the paranoid parent market will be the real revenue generator.

    bleurk. Must be nice to be treated like a parolee by your parents... really inculcates that sense of responsibility. Ah well, you get the kids you deserve--and then we all deal with the consequences.

    1. Re:For Dogs? by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And the strange thing is: there actually exists people who think stuff like this will actually help. It's bullshit.

      If you do this to a kid, one of two things will happen:

      • The kid accepts it (perhaps grudgingly) and bows down to an unreasonable invasion of privacy. You've now got a kid less prepared to stand up for its rigths. Unless you think the same kid will later grow up able to figth back when government wants to invade the same rigths with pretty much the same reasoning ("safety")
      • Or the kid will outfox you. He'll give the handy to a friend who's attending school while himself/herself going to the beach. Or he'll announce he's going to do homework with a pal, then leave the phone-device there and head somewhere else. Or he'll find and use any of the other millions of ways of tricking a device like this. You've now established yourself as an enemy of the kid, someone who must be lied to, someone who doesn't rtust the kid and which the kid should therefore in return not trust.

      I actually consider alternative 2 the best case scenario. But for the life of me I can't figure out why any parent (and I am one) should want either of these scenarios to come trough.

    2. Re:For Dogs? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're kidding us all, right? Those Anti-Drug commercials are complete bullshit, the best thing you can do for your child is to respect their rights. This, in turn, teaches them by example to respect the rights of others.

      Oh, and there is that whole "government will do it" paranoia, but the vast majority of us feel that tracking your kids everywhere is dehumanizing.

    3. Re:For Dogs? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wondering what they're doing is one thing. Spying on them is another. It's perfectly natural for parents to want to keep up on their kids' activities. However, removing what little autonomy kids have these days by constantly tracking their movements and actions is seriously detrimental to any child's development. The right way to go about this would be to cultivate a trust relationship with one's kids, so that when they say they're going to a friend's house you can take them at their word and not worry about what they might be doing instead. Kids don't always make the best decisions, but their choices are often quite rational given the limited information and experience that they possess. It is important to understand that trust implies more than just always telling the truth: kids need to know, from experience, that their parents are looking out for their best interests and not just settings limits arbitrarily. Answering the "why" questions is one part of this; letting them make mistakes occasionally is another. People learn best from their mistakes, and keeping kids out of (reasonable) trouble is an excellent way to ensure that they are unable to handle it later on.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  6. Cell sounds like least useful of its features by caenorhabditas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The GPS and GeoFence features sound like they'd be much more useful to the pet owner than the cell phone capabilities. What, exactly, are pet owners going do tell their dog over the phone? "Sit?" "Stay?" And how will the dog respond to a disembodied voice that seems to be coming from behind its head?

    That's why this seems like a giant gimmick to me. If it weren't a gimmick, and were actually useful, the designers would have ditched the cell phone capability as a very expensive add on and just marketed it based on the dog-tracking capabilities. This will probably be bought by those pathetic dog owners who make ridiculous outfits for their pets to wear and visit pet psychologists when Fido barks twice more this week than he did last week.

  7. This won't work because... by nuckfuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you call a dog it comes to you because it hears your voice coming from the direction you want it to go. So how is the animal supposed to understand where you are calling it to when your voice is coming from a speaker beside its ear?

  8. Can't wait for the law suit... by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when someone's dog is run over because their owner calls on one of these gadgets and the dog is distracted. I mean most humans would be confused if a voice started coming out of some place on their body. I can just picture one of my dogs cocking his head from side to side in confusion.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  9. I'd debunk this.. at least for 1 dog by Animaether · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My pet maltese will happily "sit", "speak", (lay) "down" and "roll over" whenever my girlfriend calls and I set my phone on speakerphone ('crappy' GSM combined with uberscreech of a small speaker).

    It may be true in general, but there's exceptions as always.

    That said, she also looks oddly at the phone and will savagely attack it if I let it go on for too long ;)

  10. Re:Dog and bone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dog & Bone is phone.

  11. Repurpose this device by klubar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This device seems more designed for tracking people than animals. If I was marketing the device, I'd sell it as a security device for children/memory impaired adults. The value of tracking is higher, and the wearer is more likely to respond to voice commands.

    It didn't say if the phone is two-way so the responder could respond--but I guess it would be useful to be able to hear the background. I wonder if there is a "stealth" mode, where the owner can hear what's going on in the background, but the wearer doesn't hear any ringing or other noises---kind of scary.

    I could also it be useful in an auto--I wonder if the GPS is good enough to find your car in a parking lot--uncovered of course. Presumably, all the auto theives/chop shops have learned to put stolen cars in covered building, but the voice listen capability might be useful--hey you could hear your car being chopped up until the very end.

  12. I Disagree entirely by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very useful... Sometimes when walking your dog(s) in the forest they will get a scent. At that point it is nearly impossible to stop them, especially if you have a hunting dog. Or how about those people that own "fighting dogs", where you can react very quickly if they break out of garden. Overall a good idea I find... I know I would get it for both of my dogs.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  13. dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    no pet is worth what this would probably cost. the dumbest part of this entire thing is the cell phone part. sure, dogs know their name and respond to it, but part of calling your dog is to get his attention first, then give him directions. how do you know you have the dog's attention? he looks at you. why does he look at you and not the other direction, because he hears your voice coming from a certain direction. with a cell phone, the dog will hear his name, but not know where the voice is coming from. i can only image this will confuse, and annoy a dog more then anything, and i'm assuming after a while, the dog will just ignore it.

    and about responsible pet ownership? i agree. if your dog runs loose all the time, then you're a bad owner, and your dog will surely come upon some terrible fate. if your dog gets out of the yard that he should be contained in, fix your damn fence.

    either way, get your dog some training, and don't complain about the cost, because this gadget would probably cost much more then any obediance school would charge.