Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo! Joins VoIP Throng

Anders Bylund writes "Yahoo! is throwing their hat in the ring, adding Voice over IP features to the upcoming Yahoo Messenger release. With way too many players on the field, there's bound to be some kind of shakeout coming, right?"

9 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. I don't want to be at my PC to make calls by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When calling overseas, it would be nice to forego the international rates in favor of much lower data packet rates on my cellphone. If there was a service that ran on my cellular phone that used VoIP data packets at a reasonable cost, that would be a huge step forward.

    Sitting in front of my PC with a headset is not convenient.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:I don't want to be at my PC to make calls by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So get a Windows Mobile-based Pocket PC cellphone that has WiFi and download Skype for it. If your carrier doesn't support high enough bandwidth, you won't be able to use Skype on it for voice, but with wireless it's no problem.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  2. Free VoIP? by ech00ne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if this is a step towards making VoIP basically a free tool, much like the web is today. It would be interesting if Yahoo or another VoIP provider go to an advertising model to support free VoIP.

    I think it would be interesting to have ads while a call is being connected (i.e. ringing). It seems like they could pipe audio ads down the wire during the inevitable pause while the system tries to track down a cell phone, or the long distance call is being routed...

    A company like Yahoo could also put a phone front end on to the search engine, I'm thinking along the lines of directory assistance, but instead of limiting info to just addresses / phones numbers, the Yahoo directory assistance would search the internet and speak the results (and a few related ads) over the phone.

    They might even have the CPU power to do adequate speech recognotion. All told it is pretty easy to imagine a system taking adavtage of the newest phones, with enhanced SMS, web interfaces, along with a voice interface. It would also be cool if you could specify where you want your search result output to go. Maybe if they had VoIP and some type of phone based interafce you could have your results displayed on your phone, pda or spoken. With a viable VoIP perhaps you could have the results faxed to you at a hotel. I'd also like to see the option of having the results emailed.

    All told these relatively small technical advancements, would be large strides in making Yahoo even more ubiqutious. Non-computer users and casual users would have another resource to get and retrieve information in the "real-world".

  3. Shake down? SBC would like that by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Folks, this is getting interesting. VOIP is starting to explode. With projects like skype and asterisk, along side with the chat clients building it in, the phone companies ( well, ok, SBC/Ma bell ) are starting to get jittery.

    For example: I recently placed an order for a p2p ds3 from sbc. The "market executive" went out of his way to make sure that the line was more than suitable for everything I'd need. Not two minutes later, he said it isn't recommended for voip applications.

    Mark my words: We are going to start seeing legislation barring voip in any meaningful way.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  4. Re:Not really by castoridae · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There has to be a common infrastructure; in this case the different IM backbones need to be connected, addressing needs to be tackled (I have the same alias on AIM and Yahoo, e.g.). For this to happen, a lot of the leaders are going to have to cooperate and conform to an open standard & directory. This isn't going to happen as long as they still harbor ideas of become the IM standard.

    And the issue of VOIP is similar. Often it's tied to the IM systems - this is about Yahoo Messenger - (which is why I brought those up), although I suppose it doesn't have to be. But the issue of needing common backbones and address routing remain constant.

    What I find interesting is the idea of using VOIP as a bridge between different "standard" voice systems. For example, in US law enforcement and emergency response there's a big push happening to create interoperable radios between jurisdictions. The existing radios function on different frequencies, standards, etc. The dispatch centers could tie themselves together using VOIP as a common medium in order to connect their field users on whatever frequency they happen to operate.

  5. Re:yahoo! messenger! has! had! VoIP! for! 4! years by jorescobar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yahoo! Messenger did have Pc-Phone calling through an external provider, Dialpad (which the company recently purchased). But now this feature is embedded completely on the new client.

    But the big news here is that now you have the option to pick a local POTS phone number and when people call that number it rings on your Y! Messenger.

  6. Big deal by jambarama · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there's bound to be some kind of shakeout coming, right?

    No. Has there been a shakedown of IM clients? No the only thing that seems to be a long time coming is a voip gaim equivalent. A cross-platform cross-protocol client. When someone steps up with a voip client that can talk to yahoo and google talk and vonage and whatever else, then we'll have something newsworthy.

  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Re:Skype ftw by bookemdano63 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the fact that it works through a firewall is a drawback, at least from the IT perspective. Corporate IT departments hate Skype's security holes http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1891306,00.as p and companies are going to block ithttp://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1877000,00. asp.