Legal Battles Over Cellphone Tracking

stupefaction writes "The New York Times reports on recent successful court challenges to police use of cellphone tracking information in the course of an investigation. From the article: 'In the last four months, three federal judges have denied prosecutors the right to get cellphone tracking information from wireless companies without first showing "probable cause" to believe that a crime has been or is being committed. That is the same standard applied to requests for search warrants. [...] Cellular operators like Verizon Wireless and Cingular Wireless know, within about 300 yards, the location of their subscribers whenever a phone is turned on.'"

Comments

We Need to Expand the Patriot Act, Then

[Prototerm]

We can't have people's civil rights get in the way of law enforcement. We need to change the law to keep the courts out of this. The courts have no right getting involved in these matters.

*That'll* fix those Satanic, Evolution-loving, Commie Terrorists!

(/tongue in cheek)

There, I believe I've insulted enough Conservatives for one day. I'll go now.

What would Elmer say?

[DumbSwede]

When I see "Cell Phone Tracking" I can't help but think of Elmer Fud saying, "Be wery wery quite. I'm tracking cell phones. He, he, he"

Re:Patriot Act

[damian cosmas]

And I'll change some more words and see if the new sentence makes any sense.

What exactly is the problem with allowing herrings to run for election with simple knowladge[sic] of how to solve quadratic equations. It's only the same standard required before they get a pilots hat, and still a few steps short of your oh-so-precisely-defined canard.

I can change words (and spell them correctly!), too, so what's your point?

If only CTU used this technology!

[Greg@UF]

Then Jack Bauer would be featuring in "4" instead of "24".

Man, the technobabble in that show annoys me !