Slashdot Mirror


Google Users more Wealthy, Net Savvy

evil_breeds writes "A study by S.G. Cowen & Co. says that Google users tend to be richer and have more Internet experience than users of the other search engines, including Yahoo!, AOL, and Microsoft's search, according to an article on Infoworld."

9 of 280 comments (clear)

  1. That can't be by dg41 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know plenty of hippies that use Google.

  2. Quick! by TCM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone use Google and wealth and wisdom will ensue!

    --
    Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  3. One step closer by RasendeRutje · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we're one step closer to Miscrosoft paying us to use their search engine...

    --

    If Microsoft was mass, stupidity would be gravity.
  4. Rich? by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will all you rich Google users please send this Broke College Student some money?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  5. Google was good, going down? by ATeamMrT · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What made google so appealing to people was the interface, there was no advertising. There was one blank page with an input box to do a search from. Google seperated advertising from searching at a time when other engines like Excite were filled with junk that distracted.

    Today, Google seems to be going in the other direction. Offering more services, integrating more advertising.

    Just the past 6 months, I have noticed a new form of advertising by Google. In the past, there would be the advertising on the right of the page, and the advertising on top in the blue or green box. But now they sneak in 3 or 4 searches on the first page mixed in with the regular searches as advertising. Google is tempted to make money, and it will burn thier support.

    Who knows, maybe someone else will start a search engine. Google came around at a time when Yahoo and Excite dominated, but Google made a product easier to use. I remember my first time using Google... I was at Yahoo to search for something when someone said "Why don't you try google, check it out". I was hooked.

    The past few months I have been using Yahoo more for a few reasons. Maybe reason #1 is I got tired of Google having so many websites listed so high that was spam.

    The other thing which turned me off to Google was I started a website and wanted to add it to the listings. Google would not add my listings for six months. And mine is NOT spam. Why is spam listed so high, but legitimate websites are not?

  6. Dialup portals by TallMatthew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AOL, MSN and Yahoo (via relationship with SBC) are all dialup providers. It's not surprising their portals are visited more often by the, erm, underprivileged.

  7. Re:No word on... by headLITE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After I first met my gf, we didn't see each other for months since she lives halfway across the country (of course, said country being Germany, that wasn't as bad as it sounds). We started to exchange e-mails, currently totalling over 4k messages. I'm fairly certain our ability to look up information on Google and impress each other with it played an important part in this. Thousands of e-mails from the same person tend to be boring if there's never anything new in them. That was in 2004. We've been "officially together" for the better part of 2005 and she's finally moving in with me this month. Thanks, Google.

  8. Re:Mac users by jimktrains · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, you mean that *nix distro with an AWESOME GUI? Yeah I use it. I also use google the most often because it looks better in Lynx.

    On a more serious note: Some people don't use google? Even the semi-computer illerteate people I know use google and nothing else. It's like second nature to most everyone, I thought.

    --
    "You will do foolish things, but do them with enthusiasm." - S. G. Colette
  9. Re:Google makes you smarter by alchamy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps it was a bit bold to say regular expressions, its more permutations since it supports words and not letters.

    But you can do things like "word * word"

    You can also do something like this

    "(I|He|She) (can|may|will) (search|find|locate)"

    I agree with you that they would never (not atm) allow the public to have access to something that is turing-complete.