Slashdot Mirror


Throwable WiFi Camera

Dotnaught writes "The Eye Ball is a spherical, throwable WiFi camera designed to precede police into areas where there's no direct line of sight. It's manufactured by O.D.F. Optronics, Ltd, an Israeli maker of vision-based systems for the defense, security and consumer electronics markets. Remington Arms Co. has won approval from the Federal Communications Commission to sell the Eye Ball domestically, with law enforcement being likely buyers. The cost is about $4,800 for two EyeBalls (who would want just one?), which apparently also includes video monitoring gear."

19 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. not like back in the day by joe+155 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    back in my day when we wanted to see round corners we held up a little mirror and looked, these cameras would be very difficult to get somewhere completely useful, and even if you could the person who was going to shoot at you could just move. It seems you would need the ability to move the viewable image to follow them like with.... a mirror?

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:not like back in the day by sterno · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Camera with thermal imaging in the eye ball and then smoke grenaes. done deal.

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    2. Re:not like back in the day by Meagermanx · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just playing Splinter Cell, so I'm wondering why they don't just use those launchable cameras you can attach to your silenced assault rifle's grenade launcher?

    3. Re:not like back in the day by shotgunefx · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw a demonstration today on tv. It rotates horizontally after it rights itself. Though the reporter was only a few feet away from where it landed and mostly saw her legs.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    4. Re:not like back in the day by Brain_Recall · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A mirror is of course a simple practical solution to the problem. But there are caveats. A mirror allows you to see around a corner, but it could also just as easily let the enemy know where you are (tilt it just wrong and it will be like a beacon). Not to mention a mirror is a tad bit fragile in a combat situation.

      The military has used other solutions over the years. The use of a spit-shined combat knife worked extremely well for this (as it was standard issue to all soldiers). Newer technology has allowed the military to mount cameras onto the barrel of their M-16 and a small heads-up display (much like some helicopter head-up gear) is used to view. It allows them to reach the gun around a corner and view the area and even aim and return fire if needed. The camera is multi-purpose since it also could switch to night-vision.

      The SWAT would probably like this more, as close combat allows them to bounce the ball around a corner and down a hall a little nicer. The ball itself is probably heavily weighted in one side (probably with the batteries) so that it would right-side-up.

    5. Re:not like back in the day by k31bang · · Score: 3, Funny

      where it landed and mostly saw her legs.

      Soooo does this mean its a waste of money to throw into the womans locker room?

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
  2. Likely buyers by katana · · Score: 5, Funny

    Law enforcement? Please. These things will be rolling into showers, changing rooms, and bathrooms about five minutes after they hit the market, with DVD sales following right behind (UPSK1RT!!!).

    Also, the word is "precede," if you mean "going first."

    1. Re:Likely buyers by HD+Webdev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ya, 2000$ for an upskirt? What, you expect they'll give you the camera back after you toss it into the change room?

      There are organizations that will pay much more than $2000 USD for a good nekkid picture of a celebrity.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  3. Very good idea, but by AutopsyReport · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's a very good idea. But what if you toss the camera and it lands upside down? Unfortunately, you can't guarantee a good visual of your target. What would really be incredible would be a full 360 field of view with the same object. This was my first thought.

    This is where good journalism comes in -- it actually answers these questions for you. I had to search for the pdf which explained this. I'm surprised it wasn't mentioned first.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:Very good idea, but by Krach42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      God, it's like the sibling posts didn't even bother RTPDF.

      Forget everything you're thinking that it MIGHT do. It has a centrally located motor, which allows for 360 degrees of rotation of the single camera. it doesn't need to counter balance roll to upright, besides, that would be a bad design, suppose the military is throwing it into a rough surface that will not allow it to roll.

      better to have the mechanical rotation mechanism that can rotate at 4rpm, and have a software or mechanical rotation mechanism to get the sensor to point "up".

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
  4. $4800?!?! by sulli · · Score: 4, Informative

    For that it had better bring the crooks back wrapped in duct tape. I remember someone made a tiny wireless camera for a heck of a lot less.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  5. Strong Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article makes no mention of any encryption used. I suppose that you wouldn't want to use these for surveillance purposes, as they could potentially be located simply by intercepting and reviewing the perspective of the wireless signal.

    Want to locate the police? See things from their perspective and know where they're coming in. Yes, this technology sounds like a brilliant idea!

  6. Law Enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    with law enforcement being likely buyers

    Because when one of these comes crashing through the window, the bad guys are just going to say: "Huh, I wonder what that was. Oh well." And then leave it alone. Right.

    I think a system like this one has a much better chance at successfully spying on the "bad guys."

    Posting anonymously because I work at a place that manufactures these, and even though it's patented, they still like to think it's a secret. Also, clearly not everything in the patent is in the actual system. "Interpreter Software" and "Intoxication Meter" in particular are amusing bits of the patent that aren't even possible to implement as described.

  7. Hey coppers! by east+coast · · Score: 4, Funny

    Garrett called and he said he can help you with this, including a bionic eye. All he wants is for you to stop calling him taffer and chasing him all the time. Even a thief needs to make a living you know.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  8. Re:$4800?? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, this is a concept that appears throughout the world known as 'capitalism'.

    Trouble is, the force that drives the new booming field of security/military/anti-terrorism devices isn't free market, but rather how much it's possible to milk public money from law enforcement agencies before they start to complain. Since they never complain, primarily because they *want* to be seen as spending a lot to "protect" the people, all these companies keep jacking the prices up. And none of them would dare giving the game away by trying to be cheaper than the others, there's just too much money to be made for everybody without having to being normal business competition into play.

    In short, the anti-bad-guys market isn't driven by capitalism, and hasn't been since 9/11. Rather, the state and the private sector work together to spend your tax money as fast as they can, making themselves richer and you poorer under the pretext of protecting you.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  9. Re:more great editing by Nqdiddles · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please read your own link. Just for fun, of course.
    It's a totally different meaning to the usage in the summary. It could "proceed with police into an area", or "precede thim into an area". They're not the same.

    --
    And that kids is how I met your mother.
  10. At least... by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least the didn't call it the iBall.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  11. This is right out of Stargate SG1 by TheRealDamion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These look and act exactly like the G'oauld devices used in many episodes of Stargate SG1. I can't believe I'm the first to mention this, maybe it's my threshold setting? Theirs are silver with no obvious camera lens, but otherwise look and are used in the same way.

  12. Estes Oracle Digital Video Rocket by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminds me a bit of something I came across while online holiday-shopping the other day. Basically, it looks like Estes came out with a $80 rocket kit which has a built-in digital video camera. The idea is that you launch it up into the air, recover the rocket, plug a USB cable into it to download the video, and then watch a rocket's-eye-view of the flight. The camera is in the rocket's nose, so you presumably only see the ground on descent. The camera is just 320x240 with 9fps, but it still seems pretty neat.