Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

NewsWeek Looks at Search Engine Optimization

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the good-the-bad-and-the-dishonest dept.

* * Beatles-Beatles writes to tell us that Newsweeks is taking a quick look at search engine optimization. From the article: "If search-engine rankings are supposed to represent a kind of democracy--a reflection of what Internet users collectively think is most useful--then search-engine optimizers like Fishkin are the Web's lobbyists. High-priced and in some cases slyly unethical, SEOs try to manipulate the unpaid search results that help users navigate the Internet. Their goal is to boost their clients' (and in some cases their own) sites to the top of unpaid search-engine rankings--even if their true popularity doesn't warrant that elevated status."

5 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Different kinds of SEOs by this+great+guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before everyone jumps directly to the conclusion that SEOs are evil, let me tell you this. As the article states, there are 2 kinds of SEOs:

    • White hat SEOs, who help people redesign their websites to use robots.txt files, META tags, etc.
    • Black hat SEOs, who spam the Web with thousands of links, and generally abuse the technology.

    Only the second kind is evil. Other SEOs out there actually do good things and truly make the Web a better place.

  2. Democracy by nephridium · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is why people like Socrates opposed democracy - lobbyists (i.e. people good at manipulating other people) can sway many of the less educated populace, which in ancient Greece (and actually all through history to this day) was the majority of citizens. And the worst part is that those lobbyists/demagogues/politicians etc. don't need to be very knowledgable themselves, they just need to be charismatic and very convincing. Socrates (and his disciple Plato) saw this as a huge danger for society (which would prove true often enough in history, take Hitler's rise to power as the most prominent example).

    The only way to counter this effect is to have a larger base (i.e. at least more the 50%) of educated and critical thinking people in a society. And maybe for the first time in history we might have the chance to get closer to this goal.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  3. Re:+1, Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Want more insight into the mind of a PageRank player? Here's his user page. Note how the few posts he's made have been completely devoid of useful content, yet he makes copious use of BOLD AND CAPS to overemphasize whatever buzzwords he writes. Also note how his sole journal entry consists of lifting a few minor details from a Time article, including a few choice links to the appropriate content.

  4. Re:+1, Ironic by BillKaos · · Score: 5, Informative

    The best info in that page is that 16 of 18 of his submissions were accepted by the same editor, ScuttleMonkey.

    It's clear what's happening here.

  5. Re:+1, Ironic by BillKaos · · Score: 5, Informative
    Sorry for replying to myself, but it's also worth noting that in the last history, about 50+ comments talking about this guy went (presumably by someone with enough power) modded offtopic.

    Sometime is going on :)