New Object Found at Edge of Solar System
Rei writes to tell us NewScientist is reporting that a new object has been found beyond Pluto. The new object, nicknamed "Buffy", has an almost circular orbit which is tilted some 47 degrees off of most other bodies in our solar system. From the article: "Neptune has been blamed for scattering many other [Kuiper Belt Objects] into tilted paths. But these tend to show other signs of a past interaction with the giant planet, such as moving in elliptical paths and having one part of their orbit pass near Neptune's at 30 astronomical units from the Sun. [Buffy], however, follows a nearly circular path. And it is too distant to have come into direct contact with Neptune, traveling between 52 and 62 AU from the Sun. Its orbit is also too circular - and too small - to have been tilted by a passing star."
"He ventures another possible explanation - that the Sun had a twin and that both stars followed circular orbits around each other"
2 problems with this.
1) Stars do not dissapear. They continue to have fusion on larger and larger elements until it hits a point it cannot generate enough heat to fuse the next one. None of our planets match the description of a dead star.
2) "Twin" stars are remarkably identical, and our sun has plenty of life left.
Seems to me that the habit of naming new celestial bodies after pop-culture icons haven't changed during the few thousands of years we've been at it.
- These characters were randomly selected.
Well, Uranus was originally named Georgium Sidus after King George III of England. Talk about blatant ass kissing there.
m y/planets/uranus/
Source: http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astrono
how long until we redefine what the "edge" of the solar system is? since we keep finding new things further and further out.
are there objects outside the heliopause? would they be considered outside the solar system, or would that push the "edge" further still?
- Entertaining Bits from the Ancient Kernel Tree
It stems from a confusion between 'small' as in size and 'small' as in insignificant. For some reason people seem to think that the fact that they are physically small compared to a galaxy, say, makes them insignificant, as if significance is a thing handed to you by the universe rather than being something humans find or make. I guess some people can't tell the difference between a literal and a metaphorical statement.
Who will ever take them seriously when they say that someone has Buffy in scorpio, Santa in virgo, and Xena in pisces?
Um, exactly the same people who take them seriously now?
"...follows a nearly circular path. And it is too distant to have come into direct contact with Neptune..."
I suspect that any Kuiper Belt object that's come in direct contact with Neptune is now part of Neptune.