Slashdot Mirror


Bush Backed Spying On Americans

jb.hl.com writes "President Bush allowed security agents to eavesdrop on people inside the U.S. without court approval after 9/11, the New York Times has reported. The report says that under a 2002 presidential order, the National Security Agency has been unconstitutionally and illegally monitoring international communications of hundreds in the U.S. When asked about the programme on U.S. TV, the Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, said, 'The president acted lawfully in every step that he has taken.'"

3 of 1,092 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing new .. by Entropy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that I am defending Bush, but the NSA spying on Americans is nothing new. Read "The Puzzle Palace" and "Body of Secrets" by James Bamford if you want a good look inside "no such agency" .. the only things to change from the book would be the tech, not the policies, politics and yes, paranoia.

    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  2. Re:legally done by isotope23 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bush followed all the applicable laws, and members of congress knew about it. I don't see what the problem is.
    Bullshit.

    From the article :

    "Some NSA officials were so concerned about the legality of the program that they refused to participate, the Times said. Questions about the legality of the program led the administration to temporarily suspend it last year and impose new restrictions."

    When people inside the NSA have a problem with its constitutionality,
    I think thats a pretty clear indication of just how legal it is.

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  3. Re:Wow, there's a shocker. by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Informative

    You sound like an armchair fiscal conservative.

    I suggest you travel the world a little and see how different political systems pan out. You will probably come to the realization that:

    1. Communism doesn't work. Old News.

    2. Capitalist countries with social services and little governmental corruption do the best for their average citizen -- i.e. Japan, Australia, Northern European countries. They have a large middle class, with social mobility.

    3. Purely capitalist countries fare the worst -- they have no middle class. Most of the people live literally on the street or in shanties -- I'm not talking crazy homeless guy, but mom, dad, and kids. There is a small class of wealthy elite who run the entire economy and government, and they keep it all for themselves. It never trickles down. They have unchecked power, and they have no interest in letting go of *any* of their power and money.

    You want to know what country has the most productive economy? Finland. Yes, Finland, a country with cradle-to-grave social services. It also has a high standard of living and a large middle class.

    I'm sick of these neocon hucksters trying to destroy the middle class. If you like corruption and business elites running everything, MOVE TO SOUTH AMERICA. You are trying to destroy the American dream. You and your ilk have worn out your welcome.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso