Slashdot Mirror


Google To Purchase Stake In AOL For $1 Billion

Lord Haha writes "It appears that Google may be on the verge of purchasing a 5% stake in AOL." From the article: "A tie-up with Google would make sense. Time Warner has been losing out online to rivals like Microsoft and Yahoo. For its part, Google may be interested in getting access to AOL's e-mail and instant messaging service. It would strengthen Google's hand against rivals Yahoo and Microsoft, who have well-established webmail and instant messaging services. Google is a relative newcomer to this area with Gmail and Googletalk." More commentary on News.com. Big change from just a few days ago.

10 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. cd mailer by Romancer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try Google for 30 days with unlimited searches!

    (your firstborn will be named AOL234 if you do not cancel)

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  2. New instant messenger? by op12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait for Google + AIM = GAIM :)

  3. How to get around "Don't be evil" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this how they get around their "Don't be evil" (phoney) mantra? By buying and outsourcing all the evil to a company that's very good at being evil?

  4. Spelling Nazi Alert by doi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Time Warner has been losing out online

    You spelled this word correctly on Slashdot, you insensitive clod!

    --
    A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's an erection for?
  5. Not News - Guesswork by VirtualAdept · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So, I took a look at the articles in question. No sources named whatsoever, no comments from company officials, nothing at all to indicate that this is actual news and not just news analysts throwing darts at a wall somewhere and hitting "Google buys AOL". Again, for that matter, since this is something like the third time that news reports of this deal have happened.

    Wake me up when actual news occurs - complete with named sources or a press release, or something to make me think that this is more than just some writers trying to sound like they're insiders.

    1. Re:Not News - Guesswork by ToddML · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps this NY Times article will satisfy your skepticism. http://nytimes.com/2005/12/16/technology/16cnd-aol .html

  6. Re:Why? by chrisgeleven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Simple really. Google keeps AOL from Microsoft.

    Google is used by AOL Search right now. Just the amount of traffic and ad revenue from that results in like $400 million per year in Google's coffers and is 10% of their traffic.

    Without AOL, it deals a decent blow to Google, especially if it were Microsoft who takes it.

    I'm sure this deal will result in a tighter integration between Google and AOL services. Perhaps AIM will be opened up for real to any client, especially GTalk. Perhaps Gmail (or at least its interface) will replace AOL Mail.

    Who knows.

    The main thing though is that Google is paying $1 billion, but will easily recoup that due to the $400+ million a year in revenue it gets from AOL to begin with. This deal is all about preventing Microsoft from expanding in the search area.

  7. favored placement for aol? by slizz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    from a nytimes article on the subject: "Google, which prides itself on the purity of its search results, agreed to give favored placement to content from AOL throughout its site, something it has never done before."

    i dont know if this means that google will be changing search results, but if it does, this is a pretty drastic philosophy change, and something that seems to bode extremely negatively for googles future

  8. Re:I'm Confused on the whole Good / Evil thing. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Evil will always triumph because Good is dumb. -Dark Helmet

  9. Re:Has to be said by minister+of+funk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, wouldn't it be "GAY O L" ?